Molecular dynamics simulation study of parallel orientation structure and gas transport in graphite-nanoplatelet/polyethylene composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Molecular dynamics simulations of graphite-nanoplatelet/polyethylene composites have been implemented to investigate the morphological structure and gas transport property by calculations of dynamical energy, structural parameter, X-ray scattering spectrum and gas diffusion coefficient, analyzing their relationship with nanofiller concentration and temperature. The graphite-nanoplatelet/polyethylene composites represent as two-dimensional anisotropic structures with the graphite-nanoplatelets orientating in parallel to each other and composite with polyethylene matrix by intense Van der Waals force and CH-π bonding on nanoplatelet surface, causing a few ordered atomic layers of polyethylene at interface while the internal polyethylene matrix retaining isotropic amorphous morphology. Due to the nanocomposite effect, gas transport in graphite-nanoplatelet/polyethylene composites is significantly affected by the nano-interfaces and orientation of graphite-nanoplatelets without gas selectivity for percolation. The graphite nanocomposites present two-dimensional anisotropic permeation of nitrogen, oxygen and carbon dioxide molecules that the diffusion coefficients are 4 and 7 times higher along orientation plane than in perpendicular direction of graphite-nanoplatelets for 10.4% and 20.4% filler concentrations respectively, suggesting reasonable material application to the gas barrier and percolation control.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Muon and positron interactions and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Chung · Graphite J. Mater. Sci. · 2002 · 37 · 147510.1023/A:1014915307738 ↗
2. Bunch · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 245810.1021/nl801457b ↗
3. Sun · Am. Chem. Soc. Nano · 2013 · 7 · 428
4. van Rooyen · Carbon · 2016 · 109 · 3010.1016/j.carbon.2016.07.063 ↗
5. Ramanathan · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 32710.1038/nnano.2008.96 ↗
6. Lan · J. Chem. Mater. · 1994 · 6 · 57310.1021/cm00041a002 ↗
7. Macias · J. Comput. Chem. · 2005 · 26 · 145210.1002/jcc.20281 ↗
8. Funk · J. Membr. Sci. · 2008 · 313 · 22410.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.002 ↗
9. Robeson · . J. Membr. Sci. · 1991 · 62 · 16510.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J ↗
10. Azizi · Chem. Eng. Res. Des. · 2017 · 117 · 17710.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.018 ↗
11. Merkel · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 10910.1021/cm020672j ↗
12. Forrest · J. Chem. Phys. · 1994 · 101 · 261610.1063/1.467634 ↗
13. Sun · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1994 · 116 · 297810.1021/ja00086a030 ↗
14. Leimkuhler · 2010 · vol. 10 · 30
15. Souza · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 55 · 873310.1103/PhysRevB.55.8733 ↗
16. Samoletov · J. Stat. Phys. · 2007 · 128 · 132110.1007/s10955-007-9365-2 ↗
17. Guryel · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 2513110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09247 ↗
18. Wang · Polymer · 2016 · 100 · 24410.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.070 ↗
19. Checchetto · J. Membr. Sci. · 2014 · 463 · 19610.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.065 ↗
20. Gusev · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 99 · 222810.1063/1.466198 ↗