Understanding effects of conductive additives in lithium-sulfur batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Since 2009, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have been attracting much research interest, ascribed to their high energy density and cost-effectiveness. However, their S cathodes are harassed by the poor conductivity, shuttling of lithium polysulfides (LPSs), and large volume change. In improving conductivity of S cathodes, carbon materials are widely used as conductive additives. However, there still lacks a comparative study on their geometric and structural effects in Li-S batteries. To this end, a systematic investigation is conducted on two different typical conductive additives, carbon black (CB) 1 and nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets (N-GNS) 2 . This work reveals that, compared to the zero-dimensional (0D) CB nanoparticles, the two-dimensional (2D) N-GNS is structurally less defective and has a larger surface area. As a result, the 2D structure of the N-GNS helps achieve higher capacity retention but inhibits Li-ion transportation. In comparison, the 0D structure of the CB facilitates the transportation of Li-ions with a higher initial capacity but exposed to a severer shuttling behavior of LPSs. It is also found that a combination of the CB and N-GNS enables better performance of Li-S batteries, in terms of sustainable capacity, Coulombic efficiency, and rate capability. This study is inspiring for designing better S cathodes for Li-S batteries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Yin · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2013 · 52 · 50
2. Ji · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
3. Bruce · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 1
4. Wild · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 1210.1039/C5EE01388G ↗
5. Sun · Batteries Supercaps · 2018 · 1 · 210.1002/batt.201800036 ↗
6. Zheng · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 29
7. Fang · Nano Energy · 2017 · 4210.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.053 ↗
8. Fang · ACS nano · 2016 · 10 · 9
9. Liu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 324 · 110.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.125 ↗
10. Li · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 240
11. Sun · J. Power Sources · 2015 · 28510.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.138 ↗
12. Liang · Angewandte Chemie · 2015 · 127 · 13
13. Zhang · InfoMat · 2020 · 2 · 4
14. Wang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29 · 23
15. Cai · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2018 · 28 · 2
16. Tu · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 45
17. Yang · ACS nano · 2011 · 5 · 11
18. Yu · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2017 · 7 · 11
19. Yu · Energy Environ. Sci · 2016 · 9
20. Meng · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 16
21. Meng · Chem. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 21
22. Andersen · Chem. Mater. · 2019 · 31 · 710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03944 ↗
23. Zeng · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 5 · 4
24. Peng · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 1 · 710.1002/admi.201400227 ↗
25. Hao · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 37
26. Yuan · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 6 · 4
27. Li · Energy Storage Mater. · 2021 · 34
28. Li · Energy Storage Mater. · 2020 · 27
29. Qiu · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 8
30. Su · Nano Energy · 2012 · 1 · 310.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.003 ↗
31. Zheng · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 258 · 5
32. Deng · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2013 · 160 · 4
33. Sharma · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2017 · 17 · 15
34. Illig · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · 710.1149/2.030207jes ↗
35. Gaberscek · Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. · 2008 · 11 · 1010.1149/1.2964220 ↗
36. Canas · Electrochim. Acta · 2013 · 97
37. Meng · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 4 · 17