journal article·2023-02-09Open access

3D printed scaffolds based on hyaluronic acid bioinks for tissue engineering: a review

Han Chen, Huaqian Xue, Huanxuan Zeng, Minghai Dai, Chengxuan Tang, Liangle Liu

Biomaterials Research· Volume 27· Issue 1

Abstract

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely distributed in human connective tissue, and its unique biological and physicochemical properties and ability to facilitate biological structure repair make it a promising candidate for three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting in the field of tissue regeneration and biomedical engineering. Moreover, HA is an ideal raw material for bioinks in tissue engineering because of its histocompatibility, non-immunogenicity, biodegradability, anti-inflammatory properties, anti-angiogenic properties, and modifiability. Tissue engineering is a multidisciplinary field focusing on in vitro reconstructions of mammalian tissues, such as cartilage tissue engineering, neural tissue engineering, skin tissue engineering, and other areas that require further clinical applications. In this review, we first describe the modification methods, cross-linking methods, and bioprinting strategies for HA and its derivatives as bioinks and then critically discuss the strengths, shortcomings, and feasibility of each method. Subsequently, we reviewed the practical clinical applications and outcomes of HA bioink in 3D bioprinting. Finally, we describe the challenges and opportunities in the development of HA bioink to provide further research references and insights.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325200, China.

Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia 750004, China.

Xijing Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, 710032, Xi’an, China.

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Marinho A Nunes C Reis S. Biomolecules. 2021;11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11101518.10.3390/biom11101518 ↗
2. 10.1152/ajpcell.00130.202210.1152/ajpcell.00130.2022 ↗
3. 10.1186/1475-2859-10-9910.1186/1475-2859-10-99 ↗
4. Yang L Fan L Lin X Yu Y Zhao Y. Adv Sci. 2023;2304190. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202304190.10.1002/advs.202304190 ↗
5. Fatimi A Okoro OV Podstawczyk D Siminska-Stanny J Shavandi A. Gels. 2022;8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8030179.10.3390/gels8030179 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.10052210.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100522 ↗
7. Oliva F Marsilio E Asparago G Frizziero A Berardi AC Maffulli N. Cells. 2021;10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113081.10.3390/cells10113081 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c0003710.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00037 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11207210.1016/j.msec.2021.112072 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.01110.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.011 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.07.00610.1016/j.ejpb.2019.07.006 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0151-9638(10)70007-710.1016/S0151-9638(10)70007-7 ↗
13. 10.1021/bm070309b10.1021/bm070309b ↗
14. Kobayashi T Chanmee T Itano N. Biomolecules. 2020;10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10111525.10.3390/biom10111525 ↗
15. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00170.x ↗
16. 10.1021/bm049842710.1021/bm0498427 ↗
17. 10.1136/ard.38.3.29510.1136/ard.38.3.295 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11801510.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118015 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00253-021-11481-x10.1007/s00253-021-11481-x ↗
20. Khoonkari M Liang D Kamperman M Kruyt FAE van Rijn P Pharmaceutics 2022;14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14051031.10.3390/pharmaceutics14051031 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.10937710.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109377 ↗
22. Sutherland TE Dyer DP Allen JE. Science. 2023;379(6633) eabp8964. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp8964.10.1126/science.abp8964 ↗
23. 10.1080/21655979.2022.205776010.1080/21655979.2022.2057760 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.04110.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.041 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0136310.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01363 ↗
26. 10.1263/jbb.99.52110.1263/jbb.99.521 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11832010.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118320 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41586-022-04534-210.1038/s41586-022-04534-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.05310.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.053 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-981-13-7709-9_1210.1007/978-981-13-7709-9_12 ↗
31. Buhren BA Schrumpf H Hoff NP Bölke E Hilton S Gerber PA. Eur J Med Res. 2016;21:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-016-0201-5IF.10.1186/s40001-016-0201-5 ↗
32. Joy RA Vikkath N Ariyannur PS. Drug Metab Pers Ther. 2018;33(1):15–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/dmpt-2017-0031.10.1515/dmpt-2017-0031 ↗
33. Heldin P. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003;36(8):967–73. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2003000800002.10.1590/S0100-879X2003000800002 ↗
34. Mendoza G Prieto JG Real R Perez M Merino G Alvarez AI. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2009;9(13):1479–1488 https://doi.org/10.2174/13895570979036149410.2174/138955709790361494 ↗
35. Sepulveda AF Kumpgdee-Vollrath M Franco M Yokaichiya F Araujo de DR. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;630 Pt B:328–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.064.10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.064 ↗
36. Hegger PS Kupka J Minsky BB Laschat S Boehm H. Molecules. 2018;23(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040769.10.3390/molecules23040769 ↗
37. Kablik J Monheit Gary Yu L Chang Gershkovich J. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(Suppl 1):302 312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01046.x.10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01046.x ↗
38. Salwowska NM Bebenek KA ZadloDA Wcislo-Dziadecka DL. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(4):520–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12237.10.1111/jocd.12237 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0141910.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01419 ↗
40. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd810.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0015810.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00158 ↗
42. Janarthanan G Kim JH Kim I Lee C Chung EJ Noh I. Biofabrication. 2022;14(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac6c4c.10.1088/1758-5090/ac6c4c ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12495010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124950 ↗
44. 10.1002/adma.20100396310.1002/adma.201003963 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.08.00810.1016/j.matbio.2018.08.008 ↗
46. Lee WH Rho JG Yang Y Lee S Kweon S Kim HM Yoon J Choi H Lee E Kim SH You S Song Y Oh YS Kim H Han HS Han JH Jung M Park YH Choi YS Han S Lee J Choi S Kim JW Park JH Lee EK Song WK Kim E Kim W. ACS nano 2022;16(12):20057–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c07843.10.1021/acsnano.2c07843 ↗
47. Gou S Porcello A Allemann E Salomon D Micheels P Jordan O Kalia YN. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15061708.10.3390/pharmaceutics15061708 ↗
48. Bastow ER Byers S Golub SB Clarkin CE Pitsillides AA Fosang AJ. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(3):395–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-007-7360-z.10.1007/s00018-007-7360-z ↗
49. Fundaro SP Salti G Malgapo DMH Innocenti S. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810518.10.3390/ijms231810518 ↗
50. Barthold JE Martin BM Sridhar SL Vernerey F Schneider SE Wacquez A Ferguson V Calve S Neu CP. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31(35). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202103355.10.1002/adfm.202103355 ↗
51. 10.1002/adhm.20200134210.1002/adhm.202001342 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0033510.1021/acsomega.2c00335 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsabm.1c0114110.1021/acsabm.1c01141 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.17310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.173 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.01310.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.013 ↗
56. 10.1002/marc.20220044910.1002/marc.202200449 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0130010.1021/acsabm.0c01300 ↗
58. 10.1002/jbm.b.3507910.1002/jbm.b.35079 ↗
59. Flegeau K Puiggali-Jou A Zenobi-Wong M. Biofabrication. 2022;14(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac6b58.10.1088/1758-5090/ac6b58 ↗
60. Ku JK Lee KG Ghim MS Kim YK Park SH Park Y Cho YS Lee BK. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac0f47.10.1088/1748-605X/ac0f47 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12100210.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121002 ↗
62. Kim JW Han YS Lee HM Kim JK Kim YJ. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136794.10.3390/ijms22136794 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.12146510.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121465 ↗
64. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0149510.1021/acsabm.0c01495 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12077110.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120771 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11580310.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115803 ↗
67. 10.1002/asia.20220062010.1002/asia.202200620 ↗
68. Mousavi Nejad Z Zamanian A Saeidifar M Vanaei HR Salar Amoli M. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13244442.10.3390/polym13244442 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.08710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.087 ↗
70. Clark CC Yoo KM Sivakumar H Strumpf K Laxton AW Tatter SB Strowd RE Skardal A. Biomed Mater. 2022;2:18. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aca05d.10.1088/1748-605X/aca05d ↗
71. Wang D Guo Y Zhu J Liu F Xue Y Huang Y Zhu B Wu D Pan H Gong T Lu Y Yang Y Wang Z. Acta Biomater. 2023;15;165:86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.036.10.1016/j.actbio.2022.06.036 ↗
72. Huang H Wu Z Yang Z Fan X Bai S Luo J Chen M Xie X. Biomed Mater. 2022;17(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac9943.10.1088/1748-605X/ac9943 ↗
73. Kreimendahl F Kniebs C Tavares Sobreiro AM Schmitz-Rode T Jockenhoevel S Thiebes AL. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2021;19:22808000211028810. https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000211028808.10.1177/22808000211028808 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.01310.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.013 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.015 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.12060210.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120602 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11951610.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119516 ↗
78. Hossain Rakin R Kumar H Rajeev A Natale G Menard F Li ITS Kim K. Biofabrication. 2021;13(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac25cb.10.1088/1758-5090/ac25cb ↗
79. 10.1021/acsami.2c1049010.1021/acsami.2c10490 ↗
80. Derkus B Okesola BO Barrett DW D’Este M Chowdhury TT Eglin D Mata A. Acta Biomater. 2020;109:82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.025.10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.025 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.02010.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.020 ↗
82. 10.1002/chem.20170123810.1002/chem.201701238 ↗
83. 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0093110.1021/acs.biomac.6b00931 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.08910.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.089 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12045710.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120457 ↗
86. Ren H Zhang Z Cheng X Zou Z Chen X He C. Sci Adv. 2023;9(33):eadh4327. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh4327.10.1126/sciadv.adh4327 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.06110.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.061 ↗
88. 10.1021/acsami.1c1408810.1021/acsami.1c14088 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.08510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.085 ↗
90. Xia D Wang F Pan S Yuan S Liu Y Xu Y. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213785.10.3390/polym13213785 ↗
91. Cao HF Li ZL Chen YF Zhu JY Chen MY Lei HY Xiao Y Liang J Yuan T Sun Y Fan YJ Zhang XD. Compos Part B-Eng. 2023;263. ARTN 110871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110871.10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110871 ↗
92. 10.1089/wound.2014.057210.1089/wound.2014.0572 ↗
93. 10.1080/1476417070177490110.1080/14764170701774901 ↗
94. Bayer IS. Molecules. 2020;25(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112649.10.3390/molecules25112649 ↗
95. 10.1111/jocd.1347510.1111/jocd.13475 ↗
96. 10.1080/17434440.2021.201432010.1080/17434440.2021.2014320 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.01710.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.017 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12330810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123308 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.01410.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.014 ↗
100. 10.1177/0885328222107519810.1177/08853282221075198 ↗