journal article·2021-02-12Open access

Polyphenols-loaded electrospun nanofibers in bone tissue engineering and regeneration

Iruthayapandi Selestin Raja, Desingh Raj Preeth, Mohan Vedhanayagam, Suong-Hyu Hyon, Dohyung Lim, Bongju Kim, Subramaniyam Rajalakshmi, Dong-Wook Han

Biomaterials Research· Volume 25· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Bone is a complex structure with unique cellular and molecular process in its formation. Bone tissue regeneration is a well-organized and routine process at the cellular and molecular level in humans through the activation of biochemical pathways and protein expression. Though many forms of biomaterials have been applied for bone tissue regeneration, electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds have attracted more attention among researchers with their physicochemical properties such as tensile strength, porosity, and biocompatibility. When drugs, antibiotics, or functional nanoparticles are taken as additives to the nanofiber, its efficacy towards the application gets increased. Polyphenol is a versatile green/phytochemical small molecule playing a vital role in several biomedical applications, including bone tissue regeneration. When polyphenols are incorporated as additives to the nanofibrous scaffold, their combined properties enhance cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation in bone tissue defect. The present review describes bone biology encompassing the composition and function of bone tissue cells and exemplifies the series of biological processes associated with bone tissue regeneration. We have highlighted the molecular mechanism of bioactive polyphenols involved in bone tissue regeneration and specified the advantage of electrospun nanofiber as a wound healing scaffold. As the polyphenols contribute to wound healing with their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, we have compiled a list of polyphenols studied, thus far, for bone tissue regeneration along with their in vitro and in vivo experimental biological results and salient observations. Finally, we have elaborated on the importance of polyphenol-loaded electrospun nanofiber in bone tissue regeneration and discussed the possible challenges and future directions in this field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

BIO-IT Fusion Technology Research Institute, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, South Korea.

Chemical Biology and Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, AU-KBC Research Centre, Anna University, MIT Campus, Chromepet, Chennai 600 044, India.

CSIR-Central Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Chennai 600 020, India.

BMG Inc., Kyoto 601-8023, Japan.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, South Korea.

Dental Life Science Research Institute / Innovation Research & Support Center for Dental Science, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul 03080, South Korea.

Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, College of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, South Korea.

Funding

department of science & technology, india · national research foundation of korea · pusan national university

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/104086905909610.1080/1040869059096 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0297737010.1007/BF02977370 ↗
3. 10.3389/fendo.2019.0049410.3389/fendo.2019.00494 ↗
4. 10.1023/B:CBTO.0000004986.51081.c510.1023/B:CBTO.0000004986.51081.c5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.10.00210.1016/j.toxlet.2004.10.002 ↗
6. Fine AM. Oligomeric proanthocyanidin complexes: history, structure, and phytopharmaceutical applications. Altern Med Rev. 2000;5:144–151. 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3jt1Wkuw%3D%3D
7. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.05.00910.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.05.009 ↗
8. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.105410.1089/ten.2005.11.1054 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-021-89314-010.1038/s41598-021-89314-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.12988910.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129889 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.01710.1016/j.foodres.2015.10.017 ↗
13. 10.5772/intechopen.7631910.5772/intechopen.76319 ↗
14. 10.4103/0973-1296.9928510.4103/0973-1296.99285 ↗
15. 10.4049/jimmunol.172.10.594010.4049/jimmunol.172.10.5940 ↗
16. 10.1097/01.bor.0000231911.42666.7810.1097/01.bor.0000231911.42666.78 ↗
17. 10.1210/en.2004-105810.1210/en.2004-1058 ↗
18. 10.1186/s40824-019-0160-310.1186/s40824-019-0160-3 ↗
19. 10.1186/s40824-017-0095-510.1186/s40824-017-0095-5 ↗
20. 10.1186/s40824-017-0098-210.1186/s40824-017-0098-2 ↗
21. 10.1186/s40824-018-0149-310.1186/s40824-018-0149-3 ↗
22. 10.3390/nano1001001610.3390/nano10010016 ↗
23. 10.1186/s40824-021-00215-910.1186/s40824-021-00215-9 ↗
24. 10.1186/s40824-021-00223-910.1186/s40824-021-00223-9 ↗
25. 10.1186/s40824-020-00186-310.1186/s40824-020-00186-3 ↗
26. 10.1080/17425247.2020.176758310.1080/17425247.2020.1767583 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.05310.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.053 ↗
28. 10.1021/la801595m10.1021/la801595m ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.00810.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.008 ↗
30. 10.1089/ten.2004.10.116010.1089/ten.2004.10.1160 ↗
31. 10.1186/s40580-019-0209-y10.1186/s40580-019-0209-y ↗
32. 10.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-810.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-8 ↗
33. 10.1002/term.197810.1002/term.1978 ↗
34. Shin YC, Yang WJ, Lee JH, Oh JW, Kim TW, Park JC, Hyon SH, Han DW. PLGA nanofiber membranes loaded with epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate are beneficial to prevention of postsurgical adhesions. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:4067–4078.
35. 10.1080/21691401.2018.143983610.1080/21691401.2018.1439836 ↗
36. 10.1358/dot.2003.39.10.79947210.1358/dot.2003.39.10.799472 ↗
37. 10.1002/adhm.20140058710.1002/adhm.201400587 ↗
38. 10.1177/002203451350577010.1177/0022034513505770 ↗
39. 10.1063/5.001230910.1063/5.0012309 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.03210.1016/j.msec.2016.08.032 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.01410.1016/j.msec.2018.04.014 ↗
42. 10.1111/jcmm.1253310.1111/jcmm.12533 ↗
43. 10.1186/s40824-020-0183-910.1186/s40824-020-0183-9 ↗
44. 10.1186/s40824-020-00196-110.1186/s40824-020-00196-1 ↗
45. 10.1002/jcp.2604210.1002/jcp.26042 ↗
46. 10.1186/s40824-021-00214-w10.1186/s40824-021-00214-w ↗
47. Tatsuyama K, Maezawa Y, Baba H, Imamura Y, Fukuda M. Expression of various growth factors for cell proliferation and cytodifferentiation during fracture repair of bone. Euro J Histochem. 2000;44:269–278. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXos12hurg%3D
48. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.005 ↗
49. 10.1074/jbc.R109.04108710.1074/jbc.R109.041087 ↗
50. 10.1186/s40824-021-00220-y10.1186/s40824-021-00220-y ↗
51. 10.2353/ajpath.2007.06083410.2353/ajpath.2007.060834 ↗
52. 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.01.00210.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.01.002 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00002-310.1016/S0142-9612(01)00002-3 ↗
54. 10.1007/s40204-019-00125-z10.1007/s40204-019-00125-z ↗
55. 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.3.51310.1359/jbmr.2002.17.3.513 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.bone.2005.09.01510.1016/j.bone.2005.09.015 ↗
57. 10.1007/s00264-013-2059-210.1007/s00264-013-2059-2 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.03.02110.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.03.021 ↗
59. Ahmed MF, El-Sayed AK, Chen H, Zhao R, Yusuf MS, Zuo Q, Zhang Y, Li B. Comparison between curcumin and all-trans retinoic acid in the osteogenic differentiation of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17:4154–4166. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXhtlWlu7%2FJ
60. 10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.00210.1016/j.injury.2019.09.002 ↗
61. 10.1186/1476-9255-11-1510.1186/1476-9255-11-15 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.bone.2008.11.01810.1016/j.bone.2008.11.018 ↗
63. 10.3390/jfb1202003110.3390/jfb12020031 ↗
64. 10.3892/mmr.2015.399610.3892/mmr.2015.3996 ↗
65. 10.1007/s11010-015-2452-910.1007/s11010-015-2452-9 ↗
66. 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.016510.1089/ten.tea.2009.0165 ↗
67. 10.1007/s00198-015-3153-710.1007/s00198-015-3153-7 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.09.00610.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.09.006 ↗
69. 10.1002/jcb.2324210.1002/jcb.23242 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.05.01110.1016/j.phymed.2010.05.011 ↗
71. 10.1111/cpr.1209710.1111/cpr.12097 ↗
72. 10.1186/s12906-016-1320-910.1186/s12906-016-1320-9 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.02.01110.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.02.011 ↗
74. 10.1002/jor.2063810.1002/jor.20638 ↗
75. 10.1155/2007/4567310.1155/2007/45673 ↗
76. 10.1007/s00776-013-0362-910.1007/s00776-013-0362-9 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.08.00110.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.08.001 ↗
78. 10.1172/JCI4228510.1172/JCI42285 ↗
79. Ma Z, Wang R, Qiu M. Study of morphologic effects of 4 Chinese herbs by bone histomorphometry in ovariectomized rats. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999;34:82–85. 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtlSqsg%3D%3D
80. Yu S, Chen K, Li S, Zhang K. In vitro and in vivo studies of the effect of a Chinese herb medicine on osteoclastic bone resorption. Chin J Dent Res. 1999;2:7–11. 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvVOgsA%3D%3D
81. 10.3109/21691401.2016.114673110.3109/21691401.2016.1146731 ↗
82. 10.1007/s11426-014-5086-y10.1007/s11426-014-5086-y ↗
83. 10.2147/DDDT.S16544010.2147/DDDT.S165440 ↗
84. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0398110.1021/acsnano.0c03981 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.10091410.1016/j.nantod.2020.100914 ↗
86. 10.3390/polym1104067210.3390/polym11040672 ↗
87. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0066010.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00660 ↗
88. 10.1002/admi.20190057210.1002/admi.201900572 ↗
89. 10.1098/rsif.2015.025410.1098/rsif.2015.0254 ↗
90. 10.3389/fphar.2020.0075710.3389/fphar.2020.00757 ↗
91. 10.4161/19336918.2014.96850110.4161/19336918.2014.968501 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.12.05710.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.12.057 ↗
93. 10.1166/jbt.2014.125310.1166/jbt.2014.1253 ↗
94. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/5/05500710.1088/1748-6041/11/5/055007 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.04510.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.045 ↗
96. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0080210.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00802 ↗
97. 10.3390/nano902018410.3390/nano9020184 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.10576810.1016/j.ejps.2021.105768 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.12.03510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.12.035 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.nano.2019.01.00210.1016/j.nano.2019.01.002 ↗