journal article·2021-02-12Open access

Effect of Whitlockite as a new bone substitute for bone formation in spinal fusion and ectopic ossification animal model

Yuan-Zhe Jin, Guang-Bin Zheng, Minjoon Cho, Jae Hyup Lee

Biomaterials Research· Volume 25· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Background Bone substrates like hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate have been widely used for promoting spinal fusion and reducing the complications caused by autograft. Whitlockite has been reported to promote better bone formation in rat calvaria models compare with them, but no study investigated its effect on spinal fusion yet. Also, the higher osteoinductivity of whitlockite raised concern of ectopic ossification, which was a complication of spinal fusion surgery that should be avoided. Methods In this study, we compared the osteoinductivity of whitlockite, hydroxyapatite, and tricalcium phosphate porous particles with SD rat spine posterolateral fusion model and investigated whether whitlockite could induce ectopic ossification with SD rat abdominal pouch model. Results The micro-CT result from the posterolateral fusion model showed whitlockite had slightly but significantly higher percent bone volume than tricalcium phosphate, though none of the materials formed successful fusion with surrounding bone tissue. The histology results showed the bone formed on the cortical surface of the transverse process but did not form a bridge between the processes. The result from the abdominal pouch model showed whitlockite did not induce ectopic bone formation. Conclusion Whitlockite had a potential of being a better bone substrate hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate in spinal fusion with low risk of inducing ectopic ossification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heterotopic Ossification and Related Conditions · Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, South Korea.

The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun City 130021, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Taizhou Hospial of Zhejiang Province, Linhai, Zhejiang 317000, China.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Boramae-ro 5-gil 20, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07061, South Korea.

Funding

smg-snu boramae medical center

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.02110.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.021 ↗
2. Steinmann JC, Herkowitz HN. Pseudarthrosis of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;284:80–90.10.1097/00003086-199211000-00011 ↗
3. 10.1097/01.brs.0000153392.74639.ea10.1097/01.brs.0000153392.74639.ea ↗
4. 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.02310.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.023 ↗
5. 10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.27110.4055/cios.2018.10.3.271 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-210.1007/s10856-014-5240-2 ↗
7. 10.4184/asj.2012.6.1.1510.4184/asj.2012.6.1.15 ↗
8. 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.97310.31616/asj.2018.12.6.973 ↗
9. 10.1177/204173141877681910.1177/2041731418776819 ↗
10. 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.107810.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1078 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.a.3211310.1002/jbm.a.32113 ↗
12. 10.4055/cios.2011.3.3.23810.4055/cios.2011.3.3.238 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.53110.1016/j.spinee.2016.07.531 ↗
14. Eggli PS, Müller W, Schenk RK. Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:127–138. 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXkvFyku78%3D10.1097/00003086-198807000-00017 ↗
15. Cheng H, Chabok R, Guan X, Chawla A, Li Y, Khademhosseini A, et al. Synergistic interplay between the two major bone minerals, hydroxyapatite and whitlockite nanoparticles, for osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Nano Lett. 2018;69:342–351. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXis1Ohtb4%3D
16. 10.1002/adhm.20140082410.1002/adhm.201400824 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.009 ↗
18. 10.1242/dmm.03308410.1242/dmm.033084 ↗
19. 10.1177/095441191452202410.1177/0954411914522024 ↗
20. 10.2147/IJN.S13125110.2147/IJN.S131251 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.01.01310.1016/j.spinee.2012.01.013 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.1c0745310.1021/acsami.1c07453 ↗