Collagen-grafted porous HDPE/PEAA scaffolds for bone reconstruction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract After tumor resection, bone reconstruction such as skull base reconstruction using interconnected porous structure is absolutely necessary. In this study, porous scaffolds for bone reconstruction were prepared using heat-pressing and salt-leaching methods. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) and poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid) (PEAA) were chosen as the polymer composites for producing a porous scaffold of high mechanical strength and having high reactivity with biomaterials such as collagen, respectively. The porous structure was observed through surface images, and its intrusion volume and porosity were measured. Owing to the carboxylic acids on PEAA, collagen was successfully grafted onto the porous HDPE/PEAA scaffold, which was confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy and electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis. Osteoblasts were cultured on the collagen-grafted porous scaffold, and their adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation were investigated. The high viability and growth of the osteoblasts suggest that the collagen-grafted porous HDPE/PEAA is a promising scaffold material for bone generation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, South Korea.
Department of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering, Catholic University of Daegu, Kyungsan, South Korea.
Jeil Medical Corporation, Seoul, South Korea.
Funding
Kyungpook National University Research Fund
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/00020840-200308000-0001210.1097/00020840-200308000-00012 ↗
2. 10.2174/187476471080103021310.2174/1874764710801030213 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma305294710.3390/ma3052947 ↗
4. 10.1089/10763270175333764510.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
5. 10.4161/cam.4.3.1174710.4161/cam.4.3.11747 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00102-210.1016/S0142-9612(00)00102-2 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.00510.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.01210.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.012 ↗
11. Baek J-Y, Xing Z-C, Kwak G, Yoon K-B, Park S-Y, Park LS, Kang I-K. Fabrication and characterization of collagen-immobilized porous phbv/ha nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Nanomater. 2012;2012:1.10.1155/2012/171804 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.032 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.014 ↗
14. Kim HM, Chae W-P, Chang K-W, Chun S, Kim S, Jeong Y, Kang I-K. Composite nanofiber mats consisting of hydroxyapatite and titania for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;94B(2):380–387.10.1002/jbm.b.31664 ↗
15. 10.1263/jbb.100.4310.1263/jbb.100.43 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00466.x10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00466.x ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X ↗
18. 10.3171/foc.2004.16.3.1410.3171/foc.2004.16.3.14 ↗
19. 10.1002/jbm.a.3201510.1002/jbm.a.32015 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-510.1016/S1369-7021(08)70086-5 ↗
21. 10.1055/s-2008-105860910.1055/s-2008-1058609 ↗
22. James KL, Oren NG, Chad DC, William RD, William TC. Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(3):1–5.10.3171/foc.2004.16.3.14 ↗
23. 10.1177/088391150505538610.1177/0883911505055386 ↗
24. 10.1097/01.scs.0000168761.46700.dc10.1097/01.scs.0000168761.46700.dc ↗
25. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00195-810.1016/S0142-9612(01)00195-8 ↗
26. Lim J-S, Kook M-S, Jung S, Park H-J, Ohk S-H, Oh H-K. Plasma treated high-density polyethylene (hdpe) medpor implant immobilized with rhbmp-2 for improving the bone regeneration. J Nanomater. 2014;2014:7.
27. 10.1021/bm100037210.1021/bm1000372 ↗
28. Story BJ, Gaisser DM, Cook SD, Rust-Dawicki AM. In vivo performance of a modified csti dental implant coating. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(6):749–757.
29. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.12.06310.1016/j.polymer.2004.12.063 ↗
30. 10.1295/polymj.29.27410.1295/polymj.29.274 ↗
31. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.754-755.5410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.754-755.54 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.031 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.03810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.038 ↗
34. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.330-332.78110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.330-332.781 ↗
35. 10.1563/799.110.1563/799.1 ↗
36. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Whitson SW, Yliheikkila P, Felton DA. Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;14(1):37–47.
37. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00075-210.1016/S0142-9612(00)00075-2 ↗