Recent advances in the development of nature-derived photocrosslinkable biomaterials for 3D printing in tissue engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Background In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing has begun to be widely used in tissue engineering. Natural biomaterials have been employed to overcome the limitations of synthetic polymers. However, their low mechanical strength and poor printability are major disadvantages. Photocrosslinking is the most promising fabrication strategy because it is non-invasive and easy to control light intensity and exposure. In this article, developments of photocrosslinkable natural biomaterials in the field of 3D printing are reviewed. Main body Photocrosslinkable biomaterials can be broadly classified into materials that use ultraviolet (UV) and visible lights. Many natural biomaterials such as gelatin, hydroxyapatite, silk fibroin, and pectin have been modified through acrylation, crosslinked by 365 nm UV light, and 3D printed. Riboflavin could also be used to crosslink and print collagen or decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM). In the case of silk-like aneroin and modified gelatin, crosslinking is possible by forming a dityrosine bond using 452 nm visible light. Conclusion Despite the tremendous researches on the developments of photocrosslinkable 3D printing natural biomaterials, further efforts are necessary to develop source biomaterials with excellent biological functions and sufficient mechanical integrity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Collagen: Extraction and Characterization · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, South Korea.
Funding
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c6tb01662f10.1039/c6tb01662f ↗
2. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0014710.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00147 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.01110.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.01210.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.012 ↗
5. Kim S Yeon Y Lee J et al. Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y.10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat142110.1038/nmat1421 ↗
7. 10.1515/pac-2015-010610.1515/pac-2015-0106 ↗
8. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.028010.1089/ten.tea.2014.0280 ↗
9. 10.1039/c3ra42918k10.1039/c3ra42918k ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.11.00910.1016/j.mtchem.2018.11.009 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.4245810.1002/app.42458 ↗
12. 10.3390/molecules2106068510.3390/molecules21060685 ↗
13. 10.1038/nrc254410.1038/nrc2544 ↗
14. 10.1080/15476278.2015.101968710.1080/15476278.2015.1019687 ↗
15. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0c6f10.1088/1758-5090/ab0c6f ↗
16. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.00810.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.07610.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 ↗
18. Gu B Choi D Park S Kim M Kang C Kim C. 3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications. Biomater Res. 2016;20(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0058-210.1186/s40824-016-0058-2 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1111219910.3390/ma11112199 ↗
20. 10.1039/c8ra00756j10.1039/c8ra00756j ↗
21. 10.1038/nbt.295810.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.01410.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014 ↗
23. 10.1007/s40846-015-0038-310.1007/s40846-015-0038-3 ↗
24. 10.2174/13892011380480536810.2174/138920113804805368 ↗
25. Keriquel V Oliveira H Rémy M et al. In situ printing of mesenchymal stromal cells by laser-assisted bioprinting for in vivo bone regeneration applications. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x.10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x ↗
26. 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.016810.1089/ten.teb.2014.0168 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.024 ↗
28. Scranton AB Bowman CN Peiffer RW. Photopolymerization. ACS Symp Ser. 1997;673.10.1021/bk-1997-0673 ↗
29. Gosavi S, Gosavi S. Local and systemic effects of Unpolymerised monomers. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2010;7(2):82–87. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtVaks7jP
30. 10.1016/j.bprint.2017.03.00110.1016/j.bprint.2017.03.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00343-010.1016/s0142-9612(03)00343-0 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.03610.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.036 ↗
33. 10.1002/jctb.501003070910.1002/jctb.5010030709 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.04510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 ↗
35. 10.1039/c2sm06463d10.1039/c2sm06463d ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.02110.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.021 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.05010.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.050 ↗
38. 10.1039/c8mh00525g10.1039/c8mh00525g ↗
39. 10.1039/c0sm00996b10.1039/c0sm00996b ↗
40. 10.1039/c6py02034h10.1039/c6py02034h ↗
41. Gopinathan J Noh I. Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater Res. 2018;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1.10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1 ↗
42. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa780f10.1088/1758-5090/aa780f ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1103056910.3390/polym11030569 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.01310.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.013 ↗
45. 10.1002/btm2.1011010.1002/btm2.10110 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057 ↗
47. 10.1167/iovs.09-373810.1167/iovs.09-3738 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0045410.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00454 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.96.11.602010.1073/pnas.96.11.6020 ↗
50. 10.1371/journal.pone.009608210.1371/journal.pone.0096082 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.032 ↗
52. 10.1088/1748-605x/ab19fe10.1088/1748-605x/ab19fe ↗
53. 10.1038/am.2013.1910.1038/am.2013.19 ↗