journal article·2021-02-12Open access

Bioactive glasses and electrospun composites that release cobalt to stimulate the HIF pathway for wound healing applications

Anu K. Solanki, Ferdinand V. Lali, Hélène Autefage, Shweta Agarwal, Amy Nommeots-Nomm, Anthony D. Metcalfe, Molly M. Stevens, Julian R. Jones

Biomaterials Research· Volume 25· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Background Bioactive glasses are traditionally associated with bonding to bone through a hydroxycarbonate apatite (HCA) surface layer but the release of active ions is more important for bone regeneration. They are now being used to deliver ions for soft tissue applications, particularly wound healing. Cobalt is known to simulate hypoxia and provoke angiogenesis. The aim here was to develop new bioactive glass compositions designed to be scaffold materials to locally deliver pro-angiogenic cobalt ions, at a controlled rate, without forming an HCA layer, for wound healing applications. Methods New melt-derived bioactive glass compositions were designed that had the same network connectivity (mean number of bridging covalent bonds between silica tetrahedra), and therefore similar biodegradation rate, as the original 45S5 Bioglass. The amount of magnesium and cobalt in the glass was varied, with the aim of reducing or removing calcium and phosphate from the compositions. Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/bioactive glass composites were also produced. Glasses were tested for ion release in dissolution studies and their influence on Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) and expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) from fibroblast cells was investigated. Results Dissolution tests showed the silica rich layer differed depending on the amount of MgO in the glass, which influenced the delivery of cobalt. The electrospun composites delivered a more sustained ion release relative to glass particles alone. Exposing fibroblasts to conditioned media from these composites did not cause a detrimental effect on metabolic activity but glasses containing cobalt did stabilise HIF-1α and provoked a significantly higher expression of VEGF (not seen in Co-free controls). Conclusions The composite fibres containing new bioactive glass compositions delivered cobalt ions at a sustained rate, which could be mediated by the magnesium content of the glass. The dissolution products stabilised HIF-1α and provoked a significantly higher expression of VEGF, suggesting the composites activated the HIF pathway to stimulate angiogenesis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Mark’s Hospitals Campus, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK.

Healthcare Technologies Institute, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research

References (99)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.02310.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
3. 10.1515/bglass-2015-000110.1515/bglass-2015-0001 ↗
4. 10.1111/ijag.1225210.1111/ijag.12252 ↗
5. 10.1002/jbm.82005061110.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
6. 10.1515/bglass-2019-001410.1515/bglass-2019-0014 ↗
7. 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<151::AID-JBM1001>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<151::AID-JBM1001>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
8. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199901)44:1<31::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199901)44:1<31::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200007)51:1<37::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200007)51:1<37::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-3093(78)90077-710.1016/0022-3093(78)90077-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.02810.1016/j.msec.2019.01.028 ↗
16. Lin C Mao C Zhang JJ Li YL Chen XF. Healing effect of bioactive glass ointment on full-thickness skin wounds. Biomed Mater. 2012;7(4). Article number: 045017.10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045017 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.11210.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.112 ↗
18. Lin YN, Brown RF, Jung SB, Day DE. Angiogenic effects of borate glass microfibers in a rodent model. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2014;102(12):4491–4499.
19. Day R, Boccaccini AR, Roether JA, Surey S, Forbes A, Hench LL, et al. The effect of Bioglass((R)) on epithelial cell and fibroblast proliferation and incorporation into a PGA matrix. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(4):A373.
20. 10.1007/s11095-007-9508-910.1007/s11095-007-9508-9 ↗
21. 10.1111/jace.1320710.1111/jace.13207 ↗
22. 10.1002/smll.20060017710.1002/smll.200600177 ↗
23. 10.2340/00015555-068010.2340/00015555-0680 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01064.x10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01064.x ↗
25. 10.1067/mva.2003.7010.1067/mva.2003.70 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00278.x10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00278.x ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.080523010510.1073/pnas.0805230105 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.04810.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.048 ↗
29. 10.1074/jbc.M30046320010.1074/jbc.M300463200 ↗
30. 10.1038/emm.2004.110.1038/emm.2004.1 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.08.01210.1016/j.biocel.2004.08.012 ↗
32. 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.008310.1089/ten.tea.2014.0083 ↗
33. 10.1074/jbc.270.52.3118910.1074/jbc.270.52.31189 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.01410.1016/j.msec.2015.07.014 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2000.03707.x10.1111/j.1365-2133.2000.03707.x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.01010.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.010 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.03010.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.030 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.033 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.042 ↗
40. 10.1021/am405354y10.1021/am405354y ↗
41. 10.1039/c0jm01111h10.1039/c0jm01111h ↗
42. 10.1039/c3tb00408b10.1039/c3tb00408b ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.11.05010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.11.050 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0104510.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01045 ↗
45. 10.7150/ijbs.3235810.7150/ijbs.32358 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.02210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.022 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10971-018-4823-710.1007/s10971-018-4823-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.07510.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.075 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10853-020-04644-010.1007/s10853-020-04644-0 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.11.02210.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.11.022 ↗
51. 10.1111/ijag.1221110.1111/ijag.12211 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.03010.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.030 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.006 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.02210.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022 ↗
55. 10.1002/adfm.20050075010.1002/adfm.200500750 ↗
56. 10.1002/adfm.20080192210.1002/adfm.200801922 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.01210.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.012 ↗
58. 10.1002/marc.20190001910.1002/marc.201900019 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.02010.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.020 ↗
61. 10.1039/c1sm06171b10.1039/c1sm06171b ↗
62. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-X ↗
63. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.060610.1089/ten.tea.2011.0606 ↗
64. 10.1002/jbm.a.3086610.1002/jbm.a.30866 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.02110.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.021 ↗
66. 10.1007/s10856-013-4930-510.1007/s10856-013-4930-5 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.03010.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.030 ↗
68. 10.1002/jbm.a.3498510.1002/jbm.a.34985 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.09110.1016/j.cej.2013.05.091 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.03710.1016/j.msec.2017.03.037 ↗
71. 10.1002/pat.162510.1002/pat.1625 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.02510.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.025 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.08510.1016/j.msec.2016.11.085 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.00110.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.001 ↗
75. 10.1002/aorn.1261510.1002/aorn.12615 ↗
76. 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.114910.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1149 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.04.07410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.04.074 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.07.02510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.07.025 ↗
79. 10.1021/jp801677610.1021/jp8016776 ↗
80. 10.1007/s10856-015-5403-910.1007/s10856-015-5403-9 ↗
81. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00488.x10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00488.x ↗
82. Oudadesse H Dietrich E Gal YL Pellen P Bureau B Mostafa AA et al. Apatite forming ability and cytocompatibility of pure and Zn-doped bioactive glasses. Biomed Mater. 2011;6(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/748-6041/6/3/035006.10.1088/1748-6041/6/3/035006 ↗
83. 10.1366/00037027477433262310.1366/000370274774332623 ↗
84. 10.1002/jbm.1005310.1002/jbm.10053 ↗
85. 10.1093/toxsci/kfh27810.1093/toxsci/kfh278 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.03410.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.034 ↗
87. 10.1098/rsif.2011.038710.1098/rsif.2011.0387 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.09410.1016/j.apsusc.2008.06.094 ↗
89. Ahmad NE, Fearn S, Jones JR, Lee WE, et al.. Preliminary surface study of short term dissolution of UK high level waste glass. In: Angeli F, Delaye JM, Schuller S, Pinet O, Rebiscoul D, Gin S, et al., editors. 2nd International Summer School on Nuclear Glass Wasteform: Structure, Properties and Long-Term Behavior. Procedia Materials Science. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B; 2014. p. 230–236.
90. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.07210.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.072 ↗
91. 10.1038/nmat230110.1038/nmat2301 ↗
92. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09382.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09382.x ↗
93. Majerus O, Gerardin T, Manolescu G, Barboux P, Caurant D. Effect of aqueous Mg2+ and Ca2+ cations on the dissolution kinetics and alteration layer of sodium borosilicate glasses at neutral pH buffered with Tris/HCI. Phys Chem Glasses - Eur J Glass Sci Technol Part B. 2014;55(6):261–273.
94. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.03210.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.032 ↗
95. 10.1002/jbm.a.3506910.1002/jbm.a.35069 ↗
96. 10.1111/wrr.1270110.1111/wrr.12701 ↗
97. 10.2741/161010.2741/1610 ↗
98. 10.1039/C6BM00290K10.1039/C6BM00290K ↗
99. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.01810.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.018 ↗