journal article·2022-09-30Open access

Application of bioactive glasses in various dental fields

Nazanin Jafari, Mina Seyed Habashi, Alireza Hashemi, Reza Shirazi, Nader Tanideh, Amin Tamadon

Biomaterials Research· Volume 26· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Bioactive glasses are a group of bioceramic materials that have extensive clinical applications. Their properties such as high biocompatibility, antimicrobial features, and bioactivity in the internal environment of the body have made them useful biomaterials in various fields of medicine and dentistry. There is a great variation in the main composition of these glasses and some of them whose medical usage has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are called Bioglass. Bioactive glasses have appropriate biocompatibility with the body and they are similar to bone hydroxyapatite in terms of calcium and phosphate contents. Bioactive glasses are applied in different branches of dentistry like periodontics, orthodontics, endodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, esthetic and restorative dentistry. Also, some dental and oral care products have bioactive glasses in their compositions. Bioactive glasses have been used as dental implants in the human body in order to repair and replace damaged bones. Other applications of bioactive glasses in dentistry include their usage in periodontal disease, root canal treatments, maxillofacial surgeries, dental restorations, air abrasions, dental adhesives, enamel remineralization, and dentin hypersensitivity. Since the use of bioactive glasses in dentistry is widespread, there is a need to find methods and extensive resources to supply the required bioactive glasses. Various techniques have been identified for the production of bioactive glasses, and marine sponges have recently been considered as a rich source of it. Marine sponges are widely available and many species have been identified around the world, including the Persian Gulf. Marine sponges, as the simplest group of animals, produce different bioactive compounds that are used in a wide range of medical sciences. Numerous studies have shown the anti-tumor, anti-viral, anti-inflammatory, and antibiotic effects of these compounds. Furthermore, some species of marine sponges due to the mineral contents of their structural skeletons, which are made of biosilica, have been used for extracting bioactive glasses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Dental Erosion and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Persian Gulf Marine Biotechnology Research Center, Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Stem Cells Technology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71348-74478, Iran.

Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

PerciaVista R&D Co., Shiraz 7514633196, Iran.

Funding

Bushehr University of Medical Sciences

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002203451986190310.1177/0022034519861903 ↗
2. Sharma S, Srivastava D, Grover S, Sharma V. Biomaterials in tooth tissue engineering: a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(1):309–315.
3. 10.3390/ma1112253010.3390/ma11122530 ↗
4. 10.3390/jfb901002510.3390/jfb9010025 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
6. 10.1002/jbm.82005061110.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
7. Abbasi Z, Bahrololoom M, Shariat M, Bagheri R. Bioactive glasses in dentistry: A review. J Dent Biomater. 2015;2(1):1–9.
8. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.12.00110.1016/j.sdentj.2013.12.001 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_210.1007/978-3-030-21583-5_2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.01610.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.02810.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.028 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7NP00052A10.1039/C7NP00052A ↗
13. 10.3390/md1504011810.3390/md15040118 ↗
14. 10.1088/1748-6041/11/4/04500410.1088/1748-6041/11/4/045004 ↗
15. Ruppert EE, Barnes RD, Fox RS. Invertebrate zoology: a functional evolutionary approach. 2nd ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 2004.
16. Seradj SH, Hashemi SZ, Zomorodian K, Moein MR. Antimicrobial effects of some Persian gulf marine sponges. Iranian South Med J. 2020;23(5):494–504.10.52547/ismj.23.5.494 ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.b.3370610.1002/jbm.b.33706 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.02510.1016/j.mattod.2018.03.025 ↗
19. 10.1002/jemt.1039510.1002/jemt.10395 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12666710.1016/j.cej.2020.126667 ↗
21. Marami Zonouz S, Ardalan Ashja A, Eidi M. Differential identification of five marine sponges in the inter-tidal zone of Hormuz island (Persian gulf) by the microstructure of the spicules. Iranian J Biol Sci. 2017;11(1):45–54.
22. Abbasi Z Bahrololoom M Shariat M Bagheri R. Bioactive Glasses in Dentistry: A Review. J Dent Biomater. 2015;2(1):1–9.
23. 10.1007/s10853-017-0888-x10.1007/s10853-017-0888-x ↗
24. 10.3390/ijms2023596010.3390/ijms20235960 ↗
25. 10.1002/jbm.a.3541210.1002/jbm.a.35412 ↗
26. Greenspan DC. Developments in biocompatible glass compositions. Med Device Diagn Industry. 1999;21:150–159.
27. 10.1111/ijag.1225210.1111/ijag.12252 ↗
28. 10.1088/1748-6041/5/2/02500110.1088/1748-6041/5/2/025001 ↗
29. 10.3390/jfb1001001610.3390/jfb10010016 ↗
30. Ferreira MM, Brito AF, Brazete D, Pereira IC, Carrilho E, Abrantes AM, et al. Doping beta-TCP as a strategy for enhancing the regenerative potential of composite beta-TCP-alkali-free bioactive glass bone grafts. Exper Stud Rats Mater. 2018;12(1):4.
31. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02157.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02157.x ↗
32. Kumar A, Singh S, Thumar G, Mengji A. Bioactive glass nanoparticles (NovaMin®) for applications in dentistry. J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14:30–35.
33. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00876.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00876.x ↗
34. Kulal R, Jayanti I, Sambashivaiah S, Bilchodmath S. An in-vitro comparison of nano hydroxyapatite, novamin and proargin desensitizing toothpastes-A SEM study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(10):ZC51. 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXptlKjsQ%3D%3D
35. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.00710.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.007 ↗
36. West N, Macdonald E, Jones S, Claydon N, Hughes N, Jeffery P. Randomized in situ clinical study comparing the ability of two new desensitizing toothpaste technologies to occlude patent dentin tubules. J Clin Dentistry. 2011;22(3):82–89. 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MfislWisQ%3D%3D
37. 10.4103/0970-9290.10222810.4103/0970-9290.102228 ↗
38. 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02832.810.5958/0976-5506.2019.02832.8 ↗
39. 10.17219/dmp/9731110.17219/dmp/97311 ↗
40. 10.1159/00050370610.1159/000503706 ↗
41. 10.1111/joor.1284710.1111/joor.12847 ↗
42. 10.4103/0970-9290.13591210.4103/0970-9290.135912 ↗
43. Chacko NL, Abraham S, Rao HS, Sridhar N, Moon N, Barde DH. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of periodontal regenerative potential of PerioGlas®: a synthetic, resorbable material in treating periodontal infrabony defects. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(3):20.
44. 10.4103/0976-237X.10742710.4103/0976-237X.107427 ↗
45. 10.1002/1521-4079(200211)37:11<1165::AID-CRAT1165>3.0.CO;2-R10.1002/1521-4079(200211)37:11<1165::AID-CRAT1165>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
46. Lee HW. Effect of various residual adhesive removal methods on enamel surface after bracket debonding: a systematic Review. 2018.
47. 10.1177/002203451879204810.1177/0022034518792048 ↗
48. 10.4236/njgc.2013.3201110.4236/njgc.2013.32011 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10989510.1016/j.msec.2019.109895 ↗
50. 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-115610.5005/jp-journals-10015-1156 ↗
51. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01323.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01323.x ↗
52. 10.1177/089593740933562110.1177/0895937409335621 ↗
53. Burwell A, Jennings D, Muscle D, Greenspan DC. NovaMin and dentin hypersensitivity--in vitro evidence of efficacy. J Clin Dent. 2010;21(3):66–71.
54. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.04310.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.043 ↗
55. First ever fluoride-containing bioglass toothpaste wins FDA approval. Br Dent J. 2021;230(3):179. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-021-2714-8#rightslink.10.1038/s41415-021-2714-8 ↗
56. 10.1177/002203452095240110.1177/0022034520952401 ↗
57. 10.1902/jop.1978.49.5.22510.1902/jop.1978.49.5.225 ↗
58. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01416.x10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01416.x ↗
59. 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.22710.1902/annals.2003.8.1.227 ↗
60. 10.1902/jop.2009.08058310.1902/jop.2009.080583 ↗
61. 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.102710.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1027 ↗
62. Singh M, Mehta D. Clinical evaluation of Biogran as a graft material in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2000;3:69–72.
63. 10.1055/s-0035-155154310.1055/s-0035-1551543 ↗
64. 10.4012/dmj.2014-23310.4012/dmj.2014-233 ↗
65. 10.1177/088532820605453410.1177/0885328206054534 ↗
66. 10.2334/josnusd.53.48110.2334/josnusd.53.481 ↗
67. 10.4317/medoral.16.e23910.4317/medoral.16.e239 ↗
68. 10.3390/ph1402007510.3390/ph14020075 ↗
69. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102196-5.00011-210.1016/B978-0-08-102196-5.00011-2 ↗
70. 10.1007/s10856-007-3137-z10.1007/s10856-007-3137-z ↗
71. 10.1371/journal.pone.014037410.1371/journal.pone.0140374 ↗
72. 10.4103/0972-124X.10749010.4103/0972-124X.107490 ↗
73. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0060410.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00604 ↗
74. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01305.x10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01305.x ↗
75. 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000032820.50983.c110.1023/B:JMSM.0000032820.50983.c1 ↗
76. 10.1002/1097-4636(20010615)55:4<603::AID-JBM1054>3.0.CO;2-N10.1002/1097-4636(20010615)55:4<603::AID-JBM1054>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
77. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.01110.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.011 ↗
78. Berlin-Broner Y, Levin L, Ashkenazi M. Awareness of orthodontists regarding oral hygiene performance during active orthodontic treatment. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(3):187–191. 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38bmtlSqtA%3D%3D
79. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.01210.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.012 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.00710.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.007 ↗
81. 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.16310.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.163 ↗
82. 10.1007/s00784-017-2279-810.1007/s00784-017-2279-8 ↗
83. 10.1515/bglass-2017-000910.1515/bglass-2017-0009 ↗
84. 10.4103/2249-4987.15291410.4103/2249-4987.152914 ↗
85. 10.2341/09-132-010.2341/09-132-0 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.01110.1016/j.joen.2017.03.011 ↗
87. 10.4103/2321-4619.18822410.4103/2321-4619.188224 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.00910.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.01310.1016/j.joen.2014.07.013 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.04.00410.1016/j.sdentj.2010.04.004 ↗
91. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00330-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00330-6 ↗
92. 10.1097/01.don.0000194542.02521.af10.1097/01.don.0000194542.02521.af ↗
93. 10.1002/jbm.b.1002310.1002/jbm.b.10023 ↗
94. Hench LL. Bioceramics, a clinical success. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 1998;77(7):67–74. 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXksV2hurg%3D
95. Fetner A, Hartigan M, Low S. Periodontal repair using PerioGlas in nonhuman primates: clinical and histologic observations. Compendium. 1994;15(7):935–938.
96. Elshahat A. Correction of craniofacial skeleton contour defects using bioactive glass particles. Egypt J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;30(2):113–119.
97. 10.4236/njgc.2013.3201110.4236/njgc.2013.32011 ↗
98. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130412.x10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130412.x ↗
99. 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.07.01610.1016/j.jcms.2018.07.016 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.11.01610.1016/j.ijom.2017.11.016 ↗