Chicken Embryo Extract Remodeling of Extracellular Matrix Sustains Self-Renewal and Differentiation for Scaffold-Free Cell Sheet Formation
Source abstract
Abstract
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) is commonly used in cell culture but can make up to 60% of total production costs, limiting the scalability of cultured meat (CM). Here, we investigated chicken embryo extract (CEE) as a functional and cost-effective substitute for FBS in culturing porcine muscle satellite cells and generating scaffold-free CM constructs. The 20% CEE + 5% horse serum (HS) medium enhanced myogenic cell growth and development while maintaining paired box 7 expression and up-regulating Myogenin, supporting the coexistence of self-renewing and differentiating states. Oxygen consumption and gene expression analyses revealed reduced oxidative metabolism alongside activation of self-renewal pathways. Transcriptomic analysis showed a specific increase in growth-factor-related genes in 20% CEE + 5% HS group, including CXCL12 , TGFB3 , and FGF1 . Furthermore, 20% CEE + 5% HS differentiation media promoted the extracellular matrix and stable cell sheet organization. Stacked CEE-derived sheets yielded CM constructs with hardness and chewiness levels comparable to those of conventional pork cuts, while maintaining similar springiness and cohesiveness. Our findings show that 20% CEE + 5% HS is a feasible and cost-effective alternative to FBS, allowing for dual cell fate regulation and facilitates structured CM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pluripotent Stem Cells Research · Animal Genetics and Reproduction · Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Advanced Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Food Processing Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Funding
Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry · National Research Foundation of Korea
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.fufo.2024.10040310.1016/j.fufo.2024.100403 ↗
2. 10.1080/10408398.2022.206324910.1080/10408398.2022.2063249 ↗
3. 10.1111/1541-4337.1267810.1111/1541-4337.12678 ↗
4. 10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z10.1038/s43016-020-0112-z ↗
5. 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.11361710.1016/j.foodres.2023.113617 ↗
6. 10.1093/ps/84.9.142310.1093/ps/84.9.1423 ↗
7. 10.1111/cpr.1339710.1111/cpr.13397 ↗
8. 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60497-910.1016/S2095-3119(13)60497-9 ↗
9. 10.1093/hmg/ddad02110.1093/hmg/ddad021 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41538-025-00605-610.1038/s41538-025-00605-6 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0162510.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01625 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12115510.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121155 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20230855210.1002/adfm.202308552 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.10356910.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103569 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10616-010-9263-310.1007/s10616-010-9263-3 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncb338510.1038/ncb3385 ↗
17. 10.5713/ab.24.052110.5713/ab.24.0521 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.02.00210.1016/j.stemcr.2014.02.002 ↗
19. 10.1172/JCI3205410.1172/JCI32054 ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.83.21.820610.1073/pnas.83.21.8206 ↗
21. 10.1111/boc.20120002210.1111/boc.201200022 ↗
22. 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90265-510.1016/0012-1606(88)90265-5 ↗
23. 10.1002/dvdy.2449510.1002/dvdy.24495 ↗
24. 10.1152/physrev.00019.200310.1152/physrev.00019.2003 ↗
25. 10.3390/cells902037510.3390/cells9020375 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.exer.2021.10859410.1016/j.exer.2021.108594 ↗
27. 10.1111/wrr.1239810.1111/wrr.12398 ↗
28. 10.1152/physrev.00043.201110.1152/physrev.00043.2011 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00066-010.1016/S0092-8674(00)00066-0 ↗
30. 10.1038/nrm.2016.710.1038/nrm.2016.7 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00018-019-03093-610.1007/s00018-019-03093-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.01510.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.015 ↗
33. 10.1002/dvdy.2015110.1002/dvdy.20151 ↗
34. 10.1083/jcb.20031200710.1083/jcb.200312007 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.04410.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044 ↗
36. 10.3389/fphys.2014.0003210.3389/fphys.2014.00032 ↗
37. 10.1002/jcsm.1260110.1002/jcsm.12601 ↗
38. 10.1186/s13619-024-00190-110.1186/s13619-024-00190-1 ↗
39. 10.1126/science.123.3191.30910.1126/science.123.3191.309 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.08.02710.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.08.027 ↗
41. 10.1074/jbc.M115.66523210.1074/jbc.M115.665232 ↗
42. 10.1126/science.116080910.1126/science.1160809 ↗
43. 10.1126/science.105807910.1126/science.1058079 ↗
44. 10.3390/ijms1911364910.3390/ijms19113649 ↗
45. 10.1186/s12858-019-0108-110.1186/s12858-019-0108-1 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.00610.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.006 ↗
47. 10.1002/jbm.a.3662710.1002/jbm.a.36627 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0768610.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07686 ↗
49. Williams AG, Audsley E, Sandars DL. Environmental burdens of livestock production systems derived from life cycle assessment (LCA). Recent Adv Anim Nutr. 2007;18–39.
50. 10.1002/jbm.82027100510.1002/jbm.820271005 ↗