journal article·2021-02-12Open access

Bioceramic hydroxyapatite-based scaffold with a porous structure using honeycomb as a natural polymeric Porogen for bone tissue engineering

Mona Sari, Puspa Hening, Chotimah, Ika Dewi Ana, Yusril Yusuf

Biomaterials Research· Volume 25· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Background The application of bioceramic hydroxyapatite (HA) derived from materials high in calcium to tissue engineering has been of concern, namely scaffold. Scaffold pores allow for cell mobility metabolic processes, and delivery of oxygen and nutrients by blood vessel. Thus, pore architecture affects cell seeding efficiency, cell viability, migration, morphology, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, angiogenesis, mechanical strength of scaffolds, and, eventually, bone formation. Therefore, to improve the efficacy of bone regeneration, several important parameters of the pore architecture of scaffolds must be carefully controlled, including pore size, geometry, orientation, uniformity, interconnectivity, and porosity, which are interrelated and whose coordination affects the effectiveness of bone tissue engineering. The honeycomb (HCB) as natural polymeric porogen is used to pore forming agent of scaffolds. It is unique for fully interconnected and oriented pores of uniform size and high mechanical strength in the direction of the pores. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of HCB concentration on macropore structure of the scaffolds. Methods Bioceramic hydroxyapatite (HA) was synthesized from abalone mussel shells ( Halioitis asinina ) using a precipitation method, and HA-based scaffolds were fabricated with honeycomb (HCB) as the porogen agent. Pore structure engineering was successfully carried out using HCB at concentrations of 10, 20, and 30 wt%. Results The Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) analysis revealed that the Ca/P molar ratio of HA was 1.67 (the stoichiometric ratio of HA). The Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra results for porous HA-based scaffolds and synthesized HA showed that no chemical decomposition occurred in the HA-based scaffold fabrication process. The porosity of the scaffold tended to increase when higher concentrations of HCB were added. XRD data show that the HCB was completely degraded from the scaffold material. The cell metabolic activity and morphology of the HA + HCB 30 wt% scaffold enable it to facilitate the attachment of MC3T3E1 cells on its surface. Conclusion HCB 30 wt% is the best concentration to fabricate the scaffold corresponding to the criteria for pores structure, crystallographic properties, chemical decomposition process and cell viability for bone tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Integrated Laboratory for Research and Testing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Department of Dental Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia for PT Grant · Directorate of Research Universitas Gadjah Mada · Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/21870764.2019.159592710.1080/21870764.2019.1595927 ↗
2. Mawuntu VJ Yusuf Y. Porous-structure engineering of hydroxyapatite-based scaffold synthesized from Pomacea canaliculata shell by using polyethylene oxide as polymeric porogen. IOP Conference Series Mater Sci Eng. 2018;432. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/432/1/012045.10.1088/1757-899X/432/1/012045 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-981-13-0947-2_1610.1007/978-981-13-0947-2_16 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-319-78951-4_710.1007/978-3-319-78951-4_7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.16310.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.163 ↗
6. Sari M, Yusuf Y. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite based on green mussel shells (Perna viridis) with calcination temperature variation using the precipitation method. Int J Nanoelectronis Material. 2018;11(3):357–370.
7. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0158810.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01588 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.05810.1016/j.msec.2014.08.058 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.03010.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.030 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.06710.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.067 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.10310.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.103 ↗
12. Gecim G Donmez S Erkoc E. Calcium deficient hydroxyapatite by precipitation : Continuous process by vortex reactor and semi-batch synthesis. 2021;47:1917–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.020.10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.020 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.08.03210.1016/j.ceramint.2010.08.032 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.03.09410.1016/j.ceramint.2013.03.094 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jascer.2015.12.00210.1016/j.jascer.2015.12.002 ↗
16. 10.14456/kkuenj.2015.3010.14456/kkuenj.2015.30 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.02710.1016/j.msec.2018.12.027 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.02710.1016/j.msec.2018.12.027 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.06410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.03.064 ↗
20. Nazarov R Jin H Kaplan DL. Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin. Biomacromolecules. 2004:718–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034327e.10.1021/bm034327e ↗
21. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00077-710.1016/S0142-9612(02)00077-7 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10931610.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109316 ↗
23. Ishikawa K Munar ML Tsuru K Miyamoto Y. Fabrication of carbonate apatite honeycomb and its tissue response. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2019:1014–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36640.10.1002/jbm.a.36640 ↗
24. 10.1080/13588265.2018.148047110.1080/13588265.2018.1480471 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.10003110.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100031 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11034710.1016/j.msec.2019.110347 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.26710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.267 ↗
28. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.377.1910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.377.19 ↗
29. 10.1023/A:100460501465210.1023/A:1004605014652 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.04110.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.041 ↗
31. Ghavidel N Xian M Marianne L Hoemann CD Favis BD. Poly ( e -caprolactone) scaffolds of highly controlled porosity and interconnectivity derived from co-continuous polymer blends : model bead and cell infiltration behavior. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014:2083–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5256-7.10.1007/s10856-014-5256-7 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.irbm.2020.05.00710.1016/j.irbm.2020.05.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.05310.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.053 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jascer.2014.01.00210.1016/j.jascer.2014.01.002 ↗