Plasma-sprayed 45S5-bioactive glass coating provides superior anti-biofilm activity compared to hydroxyapatite coating while maintaining host cell cytocompatibility and antibacterial immune activation
Source abstract
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a major complication in joint arthroplasty, leading to higher mortality, poorer outcomes, and increased failure rates in revision surgeries. Revision challenges include patient risk factors, bacterial resistance, and the need for implants that combine biological integration with antibacterial effects. The 45S5-bioactive glass (BG), with its unique osseointegration and antibacterial properties, shows promise over hydroxyapatite (HA), though its high-temperature crystallization limits the appropriate coating technologies. Using atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) with controlled thermal exposure, we successfully applied coatings of Ti-6Al-4V alloys with either HA or BG, while preserving bioactivity and mechanical properties of the BG coating. This study compared HA and BG coated Ti-6AI-4 V discs in terms of cytocompatibility, effect on biofilm formation and macrophage immune response. In doing so, we demonstrated that both coatings showed comparable attachment and viability of human bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC). We found a significant reduction in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) on the BG coatings, while a pro-inflammatory macrophage activation by bacterial colonization and biofilm formation was preserved. Overall, our study shows that BG exhibits the same properties as HA regarding BMSC attachment and survival, whereas it is superior regarding its anti-biofilm characteristics further allowing for macrophage immunocompetence against bacterial colonization. Therefore, incorporating BG coated implants into revision joint arthroplasty has the potential to enhance and advance current coating strategies by providing a multifunctional approach that combines osteoconductive and antibacterial properties. • Atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) enables the successful deposition of 45S5 bioactive glass coatings on Ti-6Al-4V alloys • 45S5 bioactive glass coatings exhibit cytocompatibility with human bone marrow stromal cells comparable to that of state-of-the-art hydroxyapatite coatings • 45S5 bioactive glass coatings significantly reduce Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation compared to conventional hydroxyapatite coatings • 45S5 bioactive glass coatings promote a pro-inflammatory and antibacterial macrophage polarization upon Staphylococcus epidermidis colonization • 45S5 bioactive glass coatings represent a promising multifunctional alternative to hydroxyapatite coatings for revision joint arthroplasty
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Management of periprosthetic joint infection: the current knowledge: AAOS exhibit selection10.2106/JBJS.K.01417 ↗
2. Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality10.2106/JBJS.L.00789 ↗
3. Poor outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with septic loosening compared to patients with aseptic loosening10.1186/s13018-021-02766-y ↗
4. Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure10.1007/s11999-010-1251-6 ↗
5. Grimberg · 2023
6. Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review10.1186/1471-2474-13-251 ↗
7. Patient-specific risk factors for infection in arthroplasty procedure10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.012 ↗
8. Outcomes and risk factors in prosthetic joint infections by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a retrospective cohort study
9. The extent of the bone defect affects the outcome of femoral reconstruction in revision surgery with impacted bone grafting: a five- to 17-year follow-up study10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.27321 ↗
10. Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants
11. Surface bio-functionalization of anti-bacterial titanium implants: a review10.3390/coatings12081125 ↗
12. Antibacterial coatings on orthopedic implants
13. Bioactive glass coatings on metallic implants for biomedical applications
14. Chronology of bioactive glass development and clinical applications10.4236/njgc.2013.32011 ↗
15. Bioactive glass: mechanisms of bone bonding
16. Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass 45S5 dissolution10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<151::AID-JBM1001>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
17. The story of Bioglass10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z ↗
18. Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
19. Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5 ↗
20. A comparative in vitro and in vivo analysis of the biological properties of the 45S5-, 1393-, and 0106-B1-bioactive glass compositions using human bone marrow-derived stromal cells and a rodent critical size femoral defect model10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213521 ↗
21. Tackling bioactive glass excessive in vitro bioreactivity: preconditioning approaches for cell culture tests10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.019 ↗
22. New insights into the crystallization process of sol-gel–derived 45S5 bioactive glass10.1111/jace.17124 ↗
23. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: state-of-the-art review and future challenges10.1016/j.msec.2019.109895 ↗
24. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of long monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated stem in revision hip arthroplasty with extended trochanteric osteotomy: a multicenter study10.1186/s13018-023-04377-1 ↗
25. Use of the Corail stem for revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of clinical outcomes and cost10.1503/cjs.002318 ↗
26. Characteristics of plasma-sprayed bioactive glass coatings on Ti-6A1-4V alloy: an in vitro study10.1016/0257-8972(95)02463-8 ↗
27. 45S5 bioactive glass coatings by atmospheric plasma spraying obtained from feedstocks prepared by different routes10.1007/s10853-014-8519-2 ↗
28. Pooling of patient-derived mesenchymal stromal cells reduces inter-individual confounder-associated variation without negative impact on cell viability, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation10.3390/cells8060633 ↗
29. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 ↗
30. Adherence of coagulase-negative Staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of Staphylococci to medical devices10.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.1985 ↗
31. Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics10.1038/s41392-023-01452-1 ↗
32. The role of itaconate in host defense and inflammation10.1172/JCI148548 ↗
33. Comparison of antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass compounds S53P4 and 45S510.1186/s12866-022-02617-8 ↗
34. Recent evidence on bioactive glass antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity: a mini-review10.3390/ma11020326 ↗
35. Beyond traditional coatings: a review on thermal-sprayed functional and smart coatings10.1007/s11666-019-00857-1 ↗
36. Bioactive glasses as alternatives to hydroxyapatite for bone implant coatings: a comparative study10.1002/jbm.b.35577 ↗
37. A comparative analysis of the cytocompatibility, protein adsorption, osteogenic and angiogenic properties of the 45S5- and S53P4-bioactive glass compositions10.1088/1748-605X/ad2210 ↗
38. Primary osteoblasts, osteoblast precursor cells or osteoblast-like cell lines: which human cell types are (most) suitable for characterizing 45S5-bioactive glass?10.1002/jbm.a.36846 ↗
39. Osteogenic differentiation of umbilical cord and adipose derived stem cells onto highly porous 45S5 Bioglass(R)-based scaffolds10.1002/jbm.a.35238 ↗
40. Bioglass 45S5: structural characterization of short range order and analysis of biocompatibility with adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro and in vivo10.1016/j.msec.2019.109781 ↗
41. Human mesenchymal stem cell morphology and migration on microtextured titanium10.3389/fbioe.2016.00041 ↗
42. Human mesenchymal stem cell morphology, migration, and differentiation on micro and nano-textured titanium
43. Antibacterial and osteogenic gain strategy on titanium surfaces for preventing implant-related infections10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.114489 ↗
44. Plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and their biological properties10.3390/coatings12091317 ↗
45. Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro10.1002/jor.22463 ↗
46. Antibiofilm agents against MDR bacterial strains: is bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 also effective?10.1093/jac/dkv327 ↗
47. Antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass S53P410.2217/fmb.14.20 ↗
48. The influence of pH and fluid dynamics on the antibacterial efficacy of 45S5 Bioglass10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/015006 ↗
49. Mechano-bactericidal actions of nanostructured surfaces10.1038/s41579-020-0414-z ↗
50. Mobile and immobile adhesion of staphylococcal strains to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.jcis.2008.11.025 ↗
51. Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis10.1016/j.resmic.2005.01.007 ↗
52. Effect of alkaline pH on staphylococcal biofilm formation10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02900.x ↗
53. Reduced sodium portions favor osteogenic properties and cytocompatibility of 45S5-based bioactive glass particles
54. Bioactive manganese-decorated titanium implants for osteoporotic bone regeneration
55. Effect of particulate bioactive glasses on human macrophages and monocytes in vitro10.1002/jbm.a.30262 ↗
56. Unraveling the immunomodulatory and metabolic effects of bioactive glass S53P4 on macrophages in vitro10.1007/s10856-025-06861-y ↗
57. Bacterial and metabolic factors of staphylococcal planktonic and biofilm environments differentially regulate macrophage immune activation10.1007/s10753-023-01824-3 ↗
58. Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.3733 ↗
59. M1 and M2 polarization of macrophages: a mini-review10.30579/mbse.2019.2.1.1 ↗
60. Chronic implant-related bone infections-can immune modulation be a therapeutic strategy?10.3389/fimmu.2019.01724 ↗
61. Monocyte metabolic reprogramming promotes pro-inflammatory activity and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm clearance10.1371/journal.ppat.1008354 ↗
62. Staphylococcal biofilms and immune polarization during prosthetic joint infection10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00636 ↗
63. Macrophage polarization in cancer and beyond: from inflammatory signaling pathways to potential therapeutic strategies10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217772 ↗
64. Advances in the role of STAT3 in macrophage polarization