Adding beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic to additive manufactured 3D porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds enhances osteogenic activity of human mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro
Source abstract
Abstract
Titanium is widely used in orthopedic and cranio-maxillofacial surgery because of its excellent mechanical properties and biocompatibility, but it lacks bioactivity in bone. Incorporating calcium phosphate ceramics such as β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) can enhance osteoconductivity. Additive manufacturing methods based on powder bed fusion typically cannot produce metal-ceramic composites. This study evaluated human mesenchymal stromal cell (hMSC) responses to novel 3D porous titanium-alloy (Ti6Al4V) scaffolds fabricated by 3D fiber deposition containing up to 10 wt% TCP. Scaffolds were manufactured as Ti6Al4V alone (Ti0) or composites with 5 wt% (Ti5) or 10 wt% (Ti10) TCP, with ∼500 μm fully interconnected pores. hMSCs were cultured for up to 28 days in basic, osteogenic, or mineralization medium. Cell behavior was assessed by DNA and metabolic assays, osteogenic differentiation by ALP activity, ELISA (OCN, OPN) and RT-qPCR (RUNX-2, ALP, OCN, OPN), ECM formation by SEM, and mineralization by Alizarin Red S staining. All scaffolds supported cell attachment and metabolic activity. Early osteogenic markers were reduced in TCP-containing scaffolds, whereas late-stage markers (OCN, OPN) were upregulated in Ti10. ECM coverage was complete after 14 days. Mineralization showed an increasing trend with increasing TCP content. These 3D porous Ti6Al4V-TCP scaffolds support hMSC attachment, osteogenic differentiation, ECM formation, and mineralization in vitro, suggesting potential for regeneration of large load-bearing bone defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, J., Cui, X., Hooper, G. J., Lim, K. S. & Woodfield, T. B. F. Rational design, bio-functionalization and biological performance of hybrid additive manufactured titanium implants for orthopaedic applications: a review. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 105, 103671 (2020).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103671 ↗
2. Biomaterials for regenerative cranioplasty: current state of clinical application and future challenges
3. Toward Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: 3D Printing Techniques in Regenerative Medicine10.3389/fbioe.2020.586406 ↗
4. Fishero, B., Kohli, N., Das, A., Christophel, J. & Cui, Q. Current concepts of bone tissue engineering for craniofacial bone defect repair. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 08, 023–030 (2014).10.1055/s-0034-1393724 ↗
5. Nikolova, M. P. & Apostolova, M. D. Advances in multifunctional bioactive coatings for metallic bone implants. Materials 16, 183 (2022).10.3390/ma16010183 ↗
6. Development of bioactive scaffolds for orthopedic applications by designing additively manufactured titanium porous structures: a critical review
7. Preparation of Cu2+/TA/HAP composite coating with anti-bacterial and osteogenic potential on 3D-printed porous Ti alloy scaffolds for orthopedic applications10.1515/biol-2022-0826 ↗
8. Evaluation of Biological Properties of Electron Beam Melted Ti6Al4V Implant with Biomimetic Coating In Vitro and In Vivo10.1371/journal.pone.0052049 ↗
9. Advances in implant surface modifications to improve osseointegration10.1039/D1MA00675D ↗
10. Titanium–tissue interface reaction and its control with surface treatment
11. Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.020 ↗
12. Wieding, J., Wolf, A. & Bader, R. Numerical optimization of open-porous bone scaffold structures to match the elastic properties of human cortical bone. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 37, 56–68 (2014).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.002 ↗
13. Influence of the pore size and porosity of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V ELI porous scaffold on cell proliferation, osteogenesis and bone ingrowth10.1016/j.msec.2019.110289 ↗
14. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
15. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
16. A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications
17. Cross talk between cells and the current bioceramics in bone regeneration: a comprehensive review10.1177/09636897241236030 ↗
18. Calcium orthophosphates in medicine: from ceramics to calcium phosphate cements10.1016/S0020-1383(00)80022-4 ↗
19. Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration10.1186/s40824-018-0149-3 ↗
20. Osteoinductive biomaterials: current knowledge of properties, experimental models and biological mechanisms
21. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors10.1002/jbm.b.30136 ↗
22. Use of “custom made” porous hydroxyapatite implants for cranioplasty: postoperative analysis of complications in 1549 patients
23. Spontaneous fractures in custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty implants: is fragility the only culprit?10.1007/s00701-014-2319-y ↗
24. Titanium based cranial reconstruction using incremental sheet forming10.1007/s12289-014-1205-8 ↗
25. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts – success and cost analysis10.1016/j.jcms.2014.08.006 ↗
26. Types and biological effects of titanium alloys in prosthodontics
27. Powder metallurgy with space holder for porous titanium implants: A review10.1016/j.jmst.2020.11.005 ↗
28. Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds
29. A review of the metal additive manufacturing processes
30. 3D porous Ti6Al4V-beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds directly fabricated by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.021 ↗
31. Li, J. P., Wijn, J. R. de, Blitterswijk, C. A. V. & Groot, K. de. Porous Ti6Al4V scaffold directly fabricating by rapid prototyping: preparation and in vitro experiment. Biomaterials 27, 1223–1235 (2006).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.033 ↗
32. Improving cell distribution on 3D additive manufactured scaffolds through engineered seeding media density and viscosity10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.020 ↗
33. Pediatric Cranial Vault Defects10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf606b ↗
34. A randomised controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty: long-term follow-up10.1007/s00701-018-3514-z ↗
35. Cranioplasty: review of materials10.1097/SCS.0000000000003025 ↗
36. β-Tricalcium phosphate as alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip/palate: a systematic review
37. Evaluation of two beta-tricalcium phosphates with different particle dimensions in human maxillary sinus floor elevation: a prospective, randomized clinical trial
38. Preservation of Alveolar Ridge using Graft Material after Tooth Extraction: A Clinical Trial10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_603_20 ↗
39. Li, J. P., Wijn, J. R. de, Blitterswijk, C. A. van & Groot, K. de. The effect of scaffold architecture on properties of direct 3D fiber deposition of porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 92A, 33–42 (2010).10.1002/jbm.a.32330 ↗
40. Study on the influence of scaffold morphology and structure on osteogenic performance10.3389/fbioe.2023.1127162 ↗
41. Osseointegration of functionally graded Ti6Al4V porous implants: Histology of the pore network10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213697 ↗
42. Chemical etching of Ti-6Al-4V biomaterials fabricated by selective laser melting enhances mesenchymal stromal cell mineralization10.1002/jbm.a.37709 ↗
43. Improving Osteointegration and Osteogenesis of Three-Dimensional Porous Ti6Al4V Scaffolds by Polydopamine-Assisted Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite Coating10.1021/acsami.5b00331 ↗
44. Tailored surface treatment of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V by microarc oxidation for enhanced osseointegration via optimized bone in-growth patterns and interlocked bone/implant interface10.1021/acsami.6b05893 ↗
45. Yavari, S. A. et al. Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium. Biomaterials 35, 6172–6181 (2014).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.054 ↗
46. Combining 3D human in vitro methods for a 3Rs evaluation of novel titanium surfaces in orthopaedic applications10.1002/bit.25919 ↗
47. Mondal, D., Nguyen, L., Oh, I. & Lee, B. Microstructure and biocompatibility of composite biomaterials fabricated from titanium and tricalcium phosphate by spark plasma sintering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 101A, 1489–1501 (2013).10.1002/jbm.a.34455 ↗
48. Porous titanium/hydroxyapatite interpenetrating phase composites with optimal mechanical and biological properties for personalized bone repair10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214079 ↗
49. Milivojevic, M. et al. Enhanced antimicrobial properties and bioactivity of 3D-printed titanium scaffolds by multilayer bioceramic coating for large bone defects. Biomed. Mater. 18, 065020 (2023).10.1088/1748-605X/ad02d2 ↗
50. Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Mineralized Alginate Matrices10.1371/journal.pone.0120374 ↗
51. Lian, J. B. & Stein, G. S. Development of the osteoblast phenotype: molecular mechanisms mediating osteoblast growth and differentiation. Iowa Orthop. J. 15, 118–40 (1995).
52. Signaling and transcriptional regulation in osteoblast commitment and differentiation10.2741/2296 ↗
53. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses10.1038/nrg3185 ↗
54. Alkaline Phosphatase Activity of Serum Affects Osteogenic Differentiation Cultures10.1021/acsomega.1c07225 ↗
55. Beck, G. R., Moran, E. & Knecht, N. Inorganic phosphate regulates multiple genes during osteoblast differentiation, including Nrf2. Exp. Cell Res. 288, 288–300 (2003).10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00213-1 ↗
56. Calcium phosphate surfaces promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00103.x ↗
57. Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue engineering: A review of properties and their influence on cell behavior10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.014 ↗
58. Revealing the influence of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds on osteogenesis of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells10.1007/s10856-021-06572-0 ↗
59. Tsao, Y.-T. et al. Osteocalcin mediates biomineralization during osteogenic maturation in human mesenchymal stromal cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 159 (2017).10.3390/ijms18010159 ↗
60. Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Matrix Formation In Vivo and In Vitro10.1089/ten.teb.2016.0454 ↗
61. Vitamin K-Dependent Carboxylation of Osteocalcin: Friend or Foe?10.3945/an.112.001834 ↗
62. Structural and mutational analyses of decarboxylated osteocalcin provide insight into its adiponectin-inducing activity10.1002/1873-3468.14618 ↗
63. Rutkovskiy, A., Stensløkken, K.-O. & Vaage, I. J. Osteoblast differentiation at a glance. Med. Sci. Monit. Basic Res. 22, 95–106 (2016).10.12659/MSMBR.901142 ↗
64. Role of Osteopontin in Modulation of Hydroxyapatite Formation10.1007/s00223-013-9698-6 ↗
65. Iline-Vul, T. et al. Osteopontin regulates biomimetic calcium phosphate crystallization from disordered mineral layers covering apatite crystallites. Sci. Rep. 10, 15722 (2020).10.1038/s41598-020-72786-x ↗
66. Osteopontin binds multiple calcium ions with high affinity and independently of phosphorylation status10.1016/j.bone.2014.05.020 ↗
67. An Osteopontin-Integrin Interaction Plays a Critical Role in Directing Adipogenesis and Osteogenesis by Mesenchymal Stem Cells10.1002/stem.1567 ↗
68. Lee, M. N. et al. Elevated extracellular calcium ions promote proliferation and migration of mesenchymal stem cells via increasing osteopontin expression. Exp. Mol. Med. 50, 1–16 (2018).10.1038/s12276-018-0170-6 ↗
69. Role of offset and gradient architectures of 3-D melt electrowritten scaffold on differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts10.1186/s40824-019-0180-z ↗
70. Influence of select extracellular matrix proteins on mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic commitment in three-dimensional contexts10.1016/j.actbio.2012.07.048 ↗
71. Cámara-Torres, M. et al. Effect of highly loaded nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds prepared via melt extrusion additive manufacturing on the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells. bioRxiv 2021.01.21.427568 (2021) doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.427568.10.1101/2021.01.21.427568 ↗
72. The effects of surface treatments on electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V disks on osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stromal cells10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213327 ↗
73. Study of Bone Regeneration and Osteointegration Effect of a Novel Selective Laser-Melted Titanium-Tantalum-Niobium-Zirconium Alloy Scaffold10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00909 ↗
74. Mimicking Nature: Effect of Architectural Design Inspired by Cancellous Bone on the Biological Response of hMSC Cultured on Titanium Scaffolds Fabricated by Laser Beam Powder Bed Fusion10.1002/jbm.a.37860 ↗
75. Graziani, G. et al. Ionized jet deposition of antimicrobial and stem cell friendly silver-substituted tricalcium phosphate nanocoatings on titanium alloy. Bioact. Mater. 6, 2629–2642 (2021).10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.019 ↗
76. Adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on additively manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy scaffolds modified with calcium phosphate nanoparticles10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.12.047 ↗
77. Differential regulation of osteogenic differentiation of stem cells on surface roughness gradients10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.015 ↗