journal article·2024-01-01Open access

Sol-gel CdS layer for TiO2 nanorod-based quantum dots-sensitized solar cells

Shixin Chen, Yangqi Meng, Shuang Feng, Tianji Ou

Materials Research Express· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract The CdS layer was essential for CdSe quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSSCs) as the seed layer and energy barrier. Here, a novel sol–gel method was employed to prepare the CdS interlayer (SG-CdS) for TiO2 nanorod-based QDSSCs. Due to the sufficient reaction of the Cd and S sources in the sol–gel solution, SG-CdS exhibited fewer impurities than CdS produced by commonly used chemical bath deposition (CBD-CdS). QDSSCs with SG-CdS exhibited an open-circuit voltage of 490 mV, a short-circuit current density of 14.12 mA cm−2, and a fill factor of 0.35. The power conversion efficiency of the QDSSCs with SG-CdS was 2.48%, which was higher than that of the QDSSCs with CBD-CdS (2.02%). Moreover, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy showed that the QDSSCs with SG-CdS yielded a charge recombination resistance of 99.92 Ω at a bias voltage of −0.5 V, demonstrating less charge recombination than the QDSSCs with CBD-CdS (82.16 Ω). Therefore, the performance of the CdSe QDSSCs could be improved by reducing the impurities in CdS. This study revealed the advantages of SG-CdS in replacing CBD-CdS as the interlayer for charge transport, as well as good applicability with nanorod photoanodes in QDSSCs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Qiu · Ceram. Int. · 2023 · 4910.1016/j.ceramint.2023.04.028 ↗
2. Zhang · ACS Energy Lett. · 2023 · 8 · 64710.1021/acsenergylett.2c02270 ↗
3. Han · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2023 · 12710.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01877 ↗
4. Song · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2021 · 143 · 479010.1021/jacs.1c01214 ↗
5. Wang · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 125910.1021/acsaem.8b01812 ↗
6. Tung · Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2018 · 910.1088/2043-6254/aaeee4 ↗
7. Khalid · IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2020 · 76210.1088/1757-899X/762/1/012007 ↗
8. Lin · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 99710.1039/D0TA10702F ↗
9. Zhou · IEEE J. Photovolt. · 2020 · 10 · 11710.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2945174 ↗
10. Deng · Chin. Phys. B · 2019 · 2810.1088/1674-1056/ab37f3 ↗
11. Yu · IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 47910.1088/1757-899X/479/1/012050 ↗
12. Badawi · Chin. Phys. B · 2015 · 2410.1088/1674-1056/24/4/047205 ↗
13. Wei · Chin. Phys. B · 2018 · 2710.1088/1674-1056/27/1/018808 ↗
14. Archana · Mater. Res. Express · 2020 · 710.1088/2053-1591/ab67f9 ↗
15. Pan · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31
16. Samadpour · Chin. Phys. B · 2014 · 2310.1088/1674-1056/23/4/047302 ↗
17. Jin · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2023 · 25510.1016/j.solmat.2023.112293 ↗
18. Salam · Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 2
19. Huang · J. Electron. Mater. · 2022 · 51 · 188410.1007/s11664-022-09452-7 ↗
20. Zhou · J. Electron. Mater. · 2019 · 48 · 732010.1007/s11664-019-07536-5 ↗
21. Cao · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2016 · 157 · 81410.1016/j.solmat.2016.08.003 ↗
22. Niitsoo · J. Photochem. Photobiol., A · 2006 · 181 · 30610.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.12.012 ↗
23. Lee · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 60410.1002/adfm.200800940 ↗
24. Yao · Thin Solid Films · 2015 · 579 · 10310.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.057 ↗
25. Ji · Ceram. Int. · 2016 · 4210.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.159 ↗
26. Wu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2013 · 551 · 17610.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.017 ↗
27. Chen · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2013 · 48 · 426110.1016/j.materresbull.2013.06.069 ↗
28. Chen · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 812610.1021/acsami.8b22418 ↗
29. Peng · J. Electron. Mater. · 2021 · 50 · 10010.1007/s11664-020-08542-8 ↗
30. Wang · Nano Energy · 2017 · 35 · 1710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.008 ↗