Behavior of UDM processed epoxy based TiO2 nano filler composite adhesive joints under fatigue loading
Source abstract
Abstract
The present research aims at comparing the behaviour of neat epoxy adhesive joints versus UDM (ultrasonic dual mixing) processed epoxy based TiO 2 nano composite adhesive joints under fatigue loading.Single lap shear adhesive joints of both adhesives were tested under static and variable loading.15% increase in toughness and 33.2% increase in fatigue limit of TiO 2 nano composite adhesive joints over neat epoxy adhesive joints were observed.Finite element analysis showed that local stresses were maximum near the edges of the adhesive layer, making them prone to crack initiation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.55210.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.552 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.005 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.032 ↗
4. Fay P A ed Adams R D · Adhesive Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications · 2000
5. Mc Adams L V · Encyclopaedia of Polymer Science and Engineering · 1986 · 6 · 322
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.017 ↗
7. 10.1016/0167-577X(95)00224-310.1016/0167-577X(95)00224-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.05.018 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.05210.1016/j.msea.2007.11.052 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.11.008 ↗
11. 10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444673210.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446732 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.00610.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.08010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.080 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.028 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.006 ↗
18. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.585.29710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.585.297 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.04910.1016/j.polymer.2012.09.049 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.02510.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.025 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.012 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010. 05.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010. 05.004 ↗
23. 10.1243/03093247V09318510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗
24. 10.1163/15685610131703550310.1163/156856101317035503 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.001 ↗
26. 10.1002/978352764702610.1002/9783527647026 ↗
27. Dillard D A · Adhesion science and engineering—Surfaces, Chemistry and Applications · 2002
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.005 ↗