journal article·2019-01-23

A novel growth strategy of TiO2anodic films using surface residual stress as driving force

Zhipeng Xie, Zhiwen Wang, Xiaohua Yu

Materials Research Express· Volume 6· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The relationship between residual stress and growth behavior of anodic titanium oxide films (TiO 2 ) was investigated in terms of defect chemistry and the nanocrystalline materials thermodynamic. The results showed that the surface residual stress can be controlled by acting on the duration of the surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT). When samples are processed by grinding for 30 min, the residual stress value reaches a maximum of 73.13 MPa, approximately 7.2 times higher than the one obtained with untreated sample. Under these conditions, the thickness of the anodic film was abound 1200 nm, three times that of the TA2 anodic film. Furthermore, the results of electrochemical tests showed that following the surface mechanical attrition treatment, the anodic film show lower density vacancies, higher resistance to the diffusion of Cl − , higher density, and an improved corrosion resistance when compared to TA2. Generally speaking, the growth behavior of the anodic film can be improved by identifying the suitable residual stress.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.04710.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.047 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.04510.1016/j.msec.2016.12.045 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.07410.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.06.074 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.04.04410.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.04.044 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.02610.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.02.00710.1016/j.corsci.2013.02.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.00710.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00223-810.1016/S0010-938X(02)00223-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.05210.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.02.052 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00283-210.1016/S0013-4686(99)00283-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2004.08.01810.1016/j.msec.2004.08.018 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12540-014-2010-010.1007/s12540-014-2010-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.045 ↗
14. 10.1002/celc.20170003810.1002/celc.201700038 ↗
15. 10.20964/2018.05.4410.20964/2018.05.44 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.01910.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.019 ↗
17. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-51610.1186/1556-276X-9-516 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11837-017-2511-710.1007/s11837-017-2511-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62650-310.1016/S1003-6326(13)62650-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.triboint.2014.05.02110.1016/j.triboint.2014.05.021 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-005-2802-110.1007/s10853-005-2802-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.02610.1016/j.msea.2007.11.026 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2013.07.02810.1016/j.vacuum.2013.07.028 ↗
24. Wang X · Mater. Rese. Exp. · 2018 · 5
25. 10.1179/02670839910150570710.1179/026708399101505707 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.01310.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.013 ↗
27. Li S M · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2013 · 8 · 543810.1016/S1452-3981(23)14693-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.00710.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.04710.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.047 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.02310.1016/j.corsci.2010.09.023 ↗