journal article·2017-11-17

Investigation of microstructural and electrical properties of composition dependent co-sputtered Hf 1− x Ta x O 2 thin films

K C Das, N Tripathy, S P Ghosh, S K Mohanta, A Nakamura, J P Kar

Materials Research Express· Volume 4· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Tantalum doped HfO 2 gate dielectric thin films were deposited on silicon substrates using RF reactive co-sputtering by varying RF power of Ta target from 15 W to 90 W. The morphological, compositional and electrical properties of Hf 1− x Ta x O 2 films were systematically investigated. The Ta content was found to be increased up to 21% for a Ta target power of 90 W. The evolution of monoclinic phase of Hf 1− x Ta x O 2 was seen from XRD study upto RF power of 60 W and afterwards, the amorphous like behaviour is appeared. The featureless smooth surface with the decrease in granular morphology has been observed from FESEM micrographs of the doped films at higher RF powers of Ta. The flatband voltage is found to be shifted towards negative voltage in the capacitance–voltage plot, which was attributed to the enhancement in positive oxide charge density with rise in RF power. The interface charge density has a minimum value of 7.85 × 10 11 eV −1 cm −2 for the film deposited at Ta RF power of 75 W. The Hf 1− x Ta x O 2 films deposited at Ta target RF power of 90 W has shown lower leakage current. The high on/off ratio of the current during the set process in Hf 1− x Ta x O 2 based memristors is found suitable for bipolar resistive switching memory device applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.01210210.1103/PhysRevB.78.012102 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.02610.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.026 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.215058610.1063/1.2150586 ↗
4. Xue K · J. Phys. D.: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 288610.1088/0022-3727/40/9/033 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.16520610.1103/PhysRevB.78.165206 ↗
6. Huang L T · J. Phys. D.: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 1
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.08410.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.084 ↗
8. 10.1038/430629a10.1038/430629a ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.06710.1016/j.ceramint.2016.04.067 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.07410.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.074 ↗
11. Zhu J · J. Phys. D.: Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 36 · 305110.1088/0022-3727/36/23/028 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.05710.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.057 ↗
13. Do W · 7th IEEE Int. Conf. on Nanotechnology · 2007 · 2
14. Nagasato Y · Japan. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 3110.1143/JJAP.47.31 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep3293110.1038/srep32931 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10854-017-7061-910.1007/s10854-017-7061-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.06.02210.1016/j.vacuum.2017.06.022 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.486625710.1063/1.4866257 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.16520310.1103/PhysRevB.82.165203 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.06610.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.066 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.338058810.1063/1.3380588 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2012.11.00710.1016/j.vacuum.2012.11.007 ↗
23. 10.1149/1.218064710.1149/1.2180647 ↗
24. Mardare A I · Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 15 · 1500610.1088/1468-6996/15/1/015006 ↗
25. Wang L · Symposia D, E and F from MRS Int. Materials Research Conf. (IOP) · 2009 · 3
26. 10.1016/S0038-1101(02)00160-010.1016/S0038-1101(02)00160-0 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.149922310.1063/1.1499223 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.164460710.1149/1.1644607 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.03.00310.1016/j.rinp.2016.03.003 ↗
30. Nicolian E H · Metal Oxide Semiconductor Physics and Technology · 1982 · 325
31. 10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70119-610.1016/S1369-7021(08)70119-6 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.349180310.1063/1.3491803 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep2934710.1038/srep29347 ↗