Effect of graphene intercalation on nonlinearity of Ag/quartz/Pt selector: first-principle calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, Ag/graphene(GR)/quartz/Pt and Ag/quartz/Pt selectors were investigated using first-principle calculations. Comparison of the electrostatic potential distribution, plane-averaged electron density difference, and density of states (DOS) of the Ag(111)/quartz(001) and Ag(111)/GR/quartz(001) interfaces shows that the insertion of GR increases the interfacial Schottky barrier height (SBH), decreases the interfacial charge transfer, and improves the conductivity and reliability of quartz. Ag/GR/quartz/Pt and Ag/quartz/Pt selectors are then designed using the above interfaces. Results show that the OFF-state current of the Ag/GR/quartz/Pt selector is reduced by about one order of magnitude, Idrive is improved (especially the positive drive current), and its nonlinearity (NL) is significantly increased. Thus, the Ag/GR/quartz/Pt selectors can better suppress leakage current in one-Selector one-RRAM (1S1R) cross array than the Ag/quartz/Pt selectors. This work may be instructive and valuable for the design and optimization of Ag/quartz/Pt selectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPROC.2012.219036910.1109/JPROC.2012.2190369 ↗
2. Demming A · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 38020110.1088/0957-4484/24/38/380201 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160445710.1002/adma.201604457 ↗
4. 10.1109/LED.2015.243033210.1109/LED.2015.2430332 ↗
5. 10.1109/TED.2015.242671710.1109/TED.2015.2426717 ↗
6. 10.1109/IEDM.2016.783834410.1109/IEDM.2016.7838344 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0078310.1021/acsnano.7b00783 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms523210.1038/ncomms5232 ↗
9. 10.1039/c3nr34148h10.1039/c3nr34148h ↗
10. 10.1063/1.486633710.1063/1.4866337 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl300266p10.1021/nl300266p ↗
12. 10.1063/1.472628410.1063/1.4726284 ↗
13. 10.1142/S021798491550147X10.1142/S021798491550147X ↗
14. 10.1021/nn302877610.1021/nn3028776 ↗
15. 10.1002/jcc.2105710.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.01.06010.1016/j.physleta.2010.01.060 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-018-19411-010.1038/s41598-018-19411-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssc.2017.12.02610.1016/j.ssc.2017.12.026 ↗
19. Si C · 2D Mater. · 2016 · 4
20. Petulante M · Aps Meeting. APS Meeting Abstracts · 2012
21. 10.1063/1.131601510.1063/1.1316015 ↗
22. 10.1142/S179329201830004910.1142/S1793292018300049 ↗
23. Pecchia A · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2004 · 67 · 149710.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R04 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1252810.1103/PhysRevB.49.12528 ↗
25. 10.1186/1556-276x-7-15810.1186/1556-276x-7-158 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1325010.1103/PhysRevB.61.13250 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.04010.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.040 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.susc.2016.12.00110.1016/j.susc.2016.12.001 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-018-29853-110.1038/s41598-018-29853-1 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.496693110.1063/1.4966931 ↗
31. 10.1109/ECACE.2017.791293110.1109/ECACE.2017.7912931 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20177018810.1002/smll.201770188 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.10680110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.106801 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.324796410.1063/1.3247964 ↗
35. 10.1115/1.402425510.1115/1.4024255 ↗
36. 10.1002/pssb.20160011110.1002/pssb.201600111 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.07541410.1103/PhysRevB.90.075414 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.352423210.1063/1.3524232 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.15531610.1103/PhysRevB.77.155316 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.143629910.1063/1.1436299 ↗
41. 10.1039/C7RA00589J10.1039/C7RA00589J ↗
42. 10.1109/IMW.2015.715030910.1109/IMW.2015.7150309 ↗
43. 10.1109/TED.2017.274758910.1109/TED.2017.2747589 ↗