journal article·2017-11-30

The effects of different liquid medias on dental composite fatigue and mechanical properties

Hongyi Fan, Tingting Wu, Zhuoli Zhu, Qingyuan Wang

Materials Research Express· Volume 4· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various pH solutions on the surface mechanical properties and fracture toughness of resin composites with different micro-structure. Thirty specimens including 3M Filtek Z350 XT (nanofiller), Superlux (microhybrid), and TPH 3 (nanohybrid) composites were selected and prepared for tests. Sorption, solubility, flexural strength, and flexural elastic modulus were measured according to an international standard after immersing the specimens into fruit juice, soda water, and milk solutions. Fracture toughness was evaluated after cyclic loading and analyzed under SEM. Filtek Z350 XT, TPH 3 , Superlux showed significantly different sorption and solubility values. In all materials, the flexural strength and flexural elastic modulus values were influenced to a greater extent by the fruit juice than the soda water. However, neither flexural strength nor flexural elastic modulus was significantly influenced by milk.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Manhart J · Oper. Dent. · 2004 · 29 · 481
2. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.03610.1016/j.dental.2005.11.036 ↗
3. 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90134-C10.1016/0300-5712(93)90134-C ↗
4. Asmussen E · J. Adhes. Dent. · 2001 · 3 · 123
5. 10.2334/josnusd.43.3510.2334/josnusd.43.35 ↗
6. Nystrom G P · Oper. Dent. · 1998 · 23 · 138
7. Besnault C · Am. J. Dent. · 2001 · 14 · 367
8. 10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<353::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<353::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
9. 10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80027-910.1016/S0109-5641(97)80027-9 ↗
10. 10.1177/0022034587066006090110.1177/00220345870660060901 ↗
11. 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90065-X10.1016/0109-5641(93)90065-X ↗
12. 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004001.73640.4c10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004001.73640.4c ↗
13. 10.1023/A:102508010385710.1023/A:1025080103857 ↗
14. 10.1177/0022034584063010170110.1177/00220345840630101701 ↗
15. 10.3109/00016357.2012.75764910.3109/00016357.2012.757649 ↗
16. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<465::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<465::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
17. 10.1016/0109-5641(95)80019-010.1016/0109-5641(95)80019-0 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.01510.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.015 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00278.x10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00278.x ↗
21. Piwowarczyk A · Oper. Dent. · 2003 · 28 · 535
22. Kumbuloglu O · Int. J. Prosthodont. · 2004 · 17 · 357
23. 10.4012/dmj.27.70210.4012/dmj.27.702 ↗
24. van der Horst G · South Afr. Med. J. · 1984 · 66 · 755
25. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.01310.1016/j.dental.2007.05.013 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.b.3033810.1002/jbm.b.30338 ↗
27. 10.1177/15440591080870080210.1177/154405910808700802 ↗
28. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00802.x10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00802.x ↗
29. 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00002-210.1016/S0300-5712(03)00002-2 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00616-110.1016/S0142-9612(03)00616-1 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00105-810.1016/S0142-9612(00)00105-8 ↗
32. 10.1067/mpr.2003.3310.1067/mpr.2003.33 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00055-X10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00055-X ↗
34. 10.1590/S1678-7757200500020000210.1590/S1678-77572005000200002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.01010.1016/j.dental.2007.05.010 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.01.01110.1016/j.dental.2007.01.011 ↗