A new phenomenological model describing the compressive thermal deformation flow stress of cast-rolled AZ31B Mg alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
In this research, the isothermal compression tests were carried out to study the hot deformation behaviors of cast-rolled AZ31B Mg alloy. The modified Arrhenius model was solved by expressing the effects of strain on the material constants. Regressive analysis was performed on the Zerilli-Armstrong (ZA) model for HCP metals based on dislocation mechanism of heat activation. The relationships between stress and strain, strain rate and temperature were analyzed for proposing a new phenomenological model. The predictive ability of the three models was assessed by calculating the goodness-of-fit as well as the error in the relative instability zone. The results show that only in the small strain zone (ε < 0.4) can the modified Arrhenius model have certain predictive ability. Both the ZA model and the new phenomenological model can well describe the hot compressive deformation behaviors of Mg alloy over a wide range of the deformation conditions, and the new phenomenological model has a reasonable number of material constants, as well as a higher predictive accuracy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.26010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.260 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jma.2018.04.00410.1016/j.jma.2018.04.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.04.00510.1016/j.jmst.2018.04.005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.02.04010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.02.040 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.04610.1016/j.msea.2016.10.046 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.01510.1016/j.msea.2018.02.015 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.12.02210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.12.022 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.02810.1016/j.msea.2018.10.028 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.02510.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.025 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.33802410.1063/1.338024 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jma.2018.05.00210.1016/j.jma.2018.05.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.03.02010.1016/j.jmst.2018.03.020 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.08910.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.089 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.11910.1016/j.msea.2007.11.119 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.15310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.153 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.02210.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.022 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.07210.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.072 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.07910.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.079 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.00810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.10.03110.1016/j.matchar.2018.10.031 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.06410.1016/j.msea.2011.07.064 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.07.01110.1016/j.mechmat.2018.07.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.03410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.034 ↗
25. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗