journal article·2019-06-19

Dispersion stability and enhanced heat transfer of cutting use nanofluids prepared by composite of carbon nanotubes and Dialkyl pentasulfide

Guan Jiju, Wang Jia, Ding Yunpeng, Lv Tao, Xu Xuefeng

Materials Research Express· Volume 6· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Dialkyl pentasulfide (DPS) filled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) composite was synthesized and then applied in the nanofluid that used for cutting. The effects of acidification time, CNTs type & content, surfactant and testing conditions on the dispersion stability, thermal conductivity and viscosity of the nanofluid were investigated. The results showed that the filling ratio of DPS into CNTs was about 28%. For the preparation of nanofluid with the best dispersion stability, the combined surfactant has been explored with the ratio of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate(SDBS) to tween-80(TW-80) being 5:5. The optimal ratio of combined surfactant to the composite was 5:1. The thermal conductivity of base liquid could be increased by 130% by the stable and fully dispersed composite that acidified for 9 h, and the shape factor of CNTs had the most significant influence on the thermal conductivity. The prepared nanofluid was a non-Newtonian fluid, and the viscosity reached minimum when surfactant content was about 0.6%. Compared with the nanofluid prepared by acidified CNTs, the nanofluid prepared by the composite had higher thermal conductivity and lower viscosity, which was mainly due to that the non-polar groups of DPS that outside of the CNTs molecule maybe make the composite combine with surfactant more fully, and exhibit a better dispersion stability in the base liquid.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Heat Transfer and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Byers J P · Metalworking Fluids · 2006 · 179
2. 10.1115/1.400433910.1115/1.4004339 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.14610.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.146 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.12210.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.122 ↗
5. Rao S N · International Journal of Engineering Science & Technology · 2011 · 1 · 2928
6. 10.1115/MSEC2013-106710.1115/MSEC2013-1067 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-012-4273-210.1007/s00170-012-4273-2 ↗
8. 10.1038/361333a010.1038/361333a0 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat96110.1038/nmat961 ↗
10. 10.3901/JME.2017.17.16010.3901/JME.2017.17.160 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tsep.2018.09.01110.1016/j.tsep.2018.09.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.06410.1016/j.carbon.2016.09.064 ↗
13. 10.1039/c1sm05973d10.1039/c1sm05973d ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2006.01.031 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20040013010.1002/adfm.200400130 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl025924u10.1021/nl025924u ↗
17. 10.1021/jp036509910.1021/jp0365099 ↗
18. Wang P · China Environmental Science · 2018 · 38 · 3429
19. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.00310.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.003 ↗
20. 10.1021/es801297u10.1021/es801297u ↗
21. 10.1038/372159a010.1038/372159a0 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00130-410.1016/S0008-6223(98)00130-4 ↗
23. Sharma B · Mater. Res. Express · 2018 · 5 · 12
24. 10.1016/S0142-727X(99)00067-310.1016/S0142-727X(99)00067-3 ↗
25. Hamilton R L · Int Heat Mass Trans · 1962 · 2 · 187
26. Rashmi W · Mater. Res. Express · 2014 · 1 · 4710.1088/2053-1591/1/3/032001 ↗