journal article·2019-05-10

Effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and bond strength of cast-rolling Cu–Al clad plates

Yazhou Liu, Wenyan Wang, Yabo Huang, Jiyao Liu, Jingpei Xie, Leiming Guo, Miaofei Zhang

Materials Research Express· Volume 6· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Effect of different annealing temperatures on evolution of microstructure in copper-aluminum clad plates prepared by cast-rolling were investigated using scanning and transmission electrical microscopy, and x-ray diffraction. Peeling tests were conducted to characterize the bond strength of prepared clad plates. Results showed that with the increase in annealing temperature, the bond strength of the 8 mm thick copper-aluminum clad plates first increased and then decreased. When the annealing temperature was 250 °C–300 °C for 3 h, CuAl2 was formed at the interface, promoting atomic diffusion and improving the bond strength. However, when the annealing temperature was 300 °C–400 °C for 3 h, providing enough energy for a new Cu9Al4 intermetallic phase formed at the interface, and the thickness of the interface layer increased from about 1 μm to 11 μm, while the bond strength decreased from 42 ± 0.8 N·mm−1 to 12 ± 1 N·mm−1. The fracture pattern of the clad plates extensible to brittle with the annealing temperatures from 300 °C to 450 °C for 3 h. According to the experimental results, the optimal annealing temperature for copper-aluminum clad plates prepared by cast-rolling is 300 °C for 3 h.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12540-016-5687-410.1007/s12540-016-5687-4 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40962-017-0140-010.1007/s40962-017-0140-0 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.07210.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.072 ↗
4. 10.1007/s41230-017-6057-710.1007/s41230-017-6057-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.03510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.035 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.05410.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.054 ↗
7. Liu S · Mater. Res. Express · 2018 · 6 · 1
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.02810.1016/j.msea.2012.11.028 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.04510.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.045 ↗
10. 10.1002/adem.20160028910.1002/adem.201600289 ↗
11. 10.2320/matertrans.MER200637110.2320/matertrans.MER2006371 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12540-016-6245-910.1007/s12540-016-6245-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.microrel.2013.02.02010.1016/j.microrel.2013.02.020 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.03210.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.032 ↗
15. 10.2320/matertrans1960.12.14710.2320/matertrans1960.12.147 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0288328110.1007/BF02883281 ↗
17. Li X-B · The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals · 2013 · 5 · 1202
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.07010.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.070 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.04110.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.041 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01172-010.1016/S0257-8972(01)01172-0 ↗
21. 10.2320/matertrans.47.123210.2320/matertrans.47.1232 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00277-610.1016/S0921-5093(03)00277-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.08010.1016/j.msea.2010.04.080 ↗