journal article·2021-11-01Open access

Biomechanical evaluation of suture materials used for abdominal fascial closure

Jose Ignacio Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Victor Segura-Ibarra, Javier Vazquez-Armendariz, Ana Lucia Garcia-Garcia, Jose Antonio Diaz-Elizondo, Ciro Rodriguez, Eduardo Flores-Villalba

Materials Research Express· Volume 8· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract Background. While there are clear recommendations for the technique and suture material for abdominal fascial closure, surgeons may have personal preferences arising from prevoius experiences or influenced during training. The decision of which suture material to use should not influence the outcome of fascial closure. The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of time and tension on the mechanical properties of sutures used for abdominal fascial closure. Methods. Polyglactin 910, polypropylene, and polydioxanone sutures were exposed to 8 and 10 newtons of constant tensile strain during a period of 7 and 14 days. They were then mechanically tested to assess changes in their properties regarding strength and deformation. Results. No significant changes were observed in maximum tensile force or extension within the different suture groups. Regarding deformation, polypropylene and polydioxanone did not exhibit alterations in their curve behavior, while polyglactin 910 did exhibit changes compared to the control group, as seen by the elevation in its Young modulus when manipulated. Conclusions. Our study finds that while different sutures behave differently, nor time or tension have a negative effect on their biomechanical resilience and can withstand tensile strengths well above any physiological or pathological condition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hernia repair and management · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. European Hernia society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5 ↗
2. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2 ↗
3. Acute wound failure10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70571-5 ↗
4. Abdominal wall muscle elasticity and abdomen local stiffness on healthy volunteers during various physiological activities10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.001 ↗
5. The biology of Hernia formation10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.007 ↗
6. 2008
7. Abdominal wound disruption
8. Wound healing—evisceration10.1097/00003081-197306000-00010 ↗
9. An evaluation of risk factors in incisional hernia recurrence
10. Effect of surgical expertise on biomechanical properties of sutures after abdominal wall closure10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.062 ↗
11. Abdominal incisions and their closure10.1016/0011-3840(85)90023-1 ↗
12. Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo10.1002/jbm.b.31136 ↗
13. The influence of fluid balance on intra-abdominal pressure after major abdominal surgery10.3390/medicina44060055 ↗
14. Mechanical properties of suture materials: an important characterization10.1097/00000658-198103000-00021 ↗
15. A biomechanical study of suture pullout in linea alba
16. Linea alba closure: determination of ideal distance between sutures10.3109/08941939309141609 ↗
17. Mechanical properties of suture materials in general and cutaneous surgery10.1002/jbm.b.33171 ↗
18. 2020
19. Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0 ↗
20. Postoperative dehiscence of the abdominal wound and its impact on excess mortality, hospital stay and costs10.1016/j.ciresp.2015.02.005 ↗
21. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures10.1007/s10856-007-3114-6 ↗
22. Force sensing in surgical sutures10.1371/journal.pone.0084466 ↗
23. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y ↗
24. Wound dehiscence. Pathophysiology and prevention10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370260033004 ↗
25. Physical and mechanical evaluation of five suture materials on three knot configurations: an in vitro study10.3390/polym8040147 ↗
26. Two-month longitudinal study of mechanical properties of absorbable sutures used in orthopedic surgery10.1186/s13018-016-0451-5 ↗
27. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.06.007 ↗