Impulse performance of synthetic esters based-nanofluid for power transformer
Source abstract
Abstract
The lightning impulse breakdown characteristics of a silica nanoparticle based-nanofluid and base oil gaps between electrodes in Type-I and Type-II electrode systems, described in this paper, has been investigated. Based on the analysis of the test results, it has been found that both the mineral oil and synthetic ester oil-MIDEL 7131 based-nanofluid with greater amount of moisture content has higher impulse breakdown strength as compared to its base oil counterparts, with low moisture, in both electrode geometries. Unlike in Type-I electrode system, where there is a linear increase in the enhancement of impulse breakdown strength in nanofluid with nanoparticle concentration level; the enhancement is almost steady in Type-II electrode system, giving an average increase of up to 32% relative to its base oil in the case of synthetic ester while the same is 15% in case of mineral oil, and thus provides interesting possibilities of improvements in the design of insulation structure in ester transformer operating at 400 kV or above. Further, the volt-time characteristics reflect superior performance of nanofluid in withstanding fast events as compared to both base mineral oil and synthetic ester oil. The testing of nanofluid presented, as per the ASTM D3300, for small gap spacing between electrodes considered, will be helpful in assessing the wide scope of the standard in nanofluid research in electric power industry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/EIC.2016.754860910.1109/EIC.2016.7548609 ↗
2. Lashbrook M · Transformers Magazine · 2015 · 1 · 14
3. Nadolny Z · Energies · 1953 · 2018 · 11
4. Segal V · IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation (ISEI) · 1998 · 619
5. 10.1063/1.366078310.1063/1.3660783 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.6b0608410.1021/acsami.6b06084 ↗
7. 10.1155/2016/837156010.1155/2016/8371560 ↗
8. 10.1109/MEI.2014.688259710.1109/MEI.2014.6882597 ↗
9. 10.1109/TDEI.2013.645135110.1109/TDEI.2013.6451351 ↗
10. 10.1520/D3300-1210.1520/D3300-12 ↗
11. 10.1049/iet-epa.2010.020910.1049/iet-epa.2010.0209 ↗
12. 10.1109/TDEI.2014.683225410.1109/TDEI.2014.6832254 ↗
13. 10.1109/94.30028810.1109/94.300288 ↗
14. Massala G · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 34 · 152510.1088/0022-3727/34/10/312 ↗
15. Qian J · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 35910.1088/0022-3727/39/2/018 ↗
16. International Standard Organization · 1999
17. International Electro-technical Commission · 1995
18. 10.1109/catcon.2017.828024610.1109/catcon.2017.8280246 ↗
19. International Electro-technical Commission · 2010
20. Apar Industries Ltd · 2018
21. 10.1109/94.98389010.1109/94.983890 ↗
22. Liu R · IEEE Conf. Electrical Insulation Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP), VA, USA · 2009 · 543
23. Liu Q · 2011
24. Sindhuja K · International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics · 2018 · 118 · 723
25. 10.1063/1.32398510.1063/1.323985 ↗
26. Hwang J G · IEEE 9th Int. Conf. on the Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials, 2009. ICPADM 2009
27. O’Sullivan F M · 2007