journal article·2017-11-27

Impedance analysis and dielectric response of anatase TiO2nanoparticles codoped with Mn and Co ions

Anand Kumar, Manish K Kashyap, Namita Sabharwal, Sarvesh Kumar, Ashok Kumar, Parmod Kumar, K Asokan

Materials Research Express· Volume 4· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

In order to elucidate the effect of transition metal (TM) doping, the impedance and dielectric responses of Co and/or Mn-doped TiO2 nanocrystalline powder samples with 3% doping concentration synthesized via sol gel technique, have been analyzed. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirms the formation of tetragonal TiO2 anatase phase for all studied samples without any extra impurity phase peaks. The variation in the grain size measured from field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) measurements for all the samples are in accordance with the change in crystallite size as obtained from XRD. The DC resistivity for pure TiO2 nanoparticles is the highest while codoped samples exhibit low resistivity. The temperature dependent dielectric constant and dielectric loss possess step like enhancement and show the relaxation behavior. At room temperature, the dielectric function and dielectric loss decrease rapidly with increase in frequency and become almost constant at the higher frequencies. Such a decrease in dielectric loss is suitable for energy storage devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dielectric properties of ceramics · ZnO doping and properties · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.19320110.1103/PhysRevB.74.193201 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.physe.2014.08.01610.1016/j.physe.2014.08.016 ↗
3. 10.1116/1.488748010.1116/1.4887480 ↗
4. 10.1155/2014/12481410.1155/2014/124814 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.15310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.153 ↗
6. 10.1155/2013/76834810.1155/2013/768348 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00339-016-9837-910.1007/s00339-016-9837-9 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.27810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.278 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.physb.2005.04.02710.1016/j.physb.2005.04.027 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04039.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04039.x ↗
11. Gafoor A K A · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 1 · 53
12. 10.1142/S201019451301031310.1142/S2010194513010313 ↗
13. 10.1039/C7TC01020F10.1039/C7TC01020F ↗
14. 10.1038/s41598-017-09141-010.1038/s41598-017-09141-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.02.05210.1016/j.mee.2015.02.052 ↗
16. Khan R · Chin. Phys. · 2015 · 24
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.29310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.293 ↗
18. Janisch R · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · R65710.1088/0953-8984/17/27/R01 ↗
19. Prellier W · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · R158310.1088/0953-8984/15/37/R01 ↗
20. 10.2174/18722120878630628910.2174/187221208786306289 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.06.00410.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.06.004 ↗
22. Rana G · Europhys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 1700810.1209/0295-5075/103/17008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.07.00510.1016/j.jmmm.2011.07.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.08510.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.085 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.mseb.2013.03.01610.1016/j.mseb.2013.03.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2017.09.00210.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2017.09.002 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.481354010.1063/1.4813540 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.02210.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.022 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.16520210.1103/PhysRevB.79.165202 ↗
30. Saha S K · J. Semicond. · 2015 · 36 · 0330041
31. 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.135810.12693/APhysPolA.130.1358 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mseb.2012.01.02210.1016/j.mseb.2012.01.022 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.350669110.1063/1.3506691 ↗
34. 10.2298/PAC1501033S10.2298/PAC1501033S ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.01.04710.1016/j.jiec.2014.01.047 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cap.2010.02.00310.1016/j.cap.2010.02.003 ↗
37. 10.1007/s12648-014-0514-610.1007/s12648-014-0514-6 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.05.02810.1016/j.mssp.2014.05.028 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.physb.2013.08.02410.1016/j.physb.2013.08.024 ↗
40. Rao B S · Chalcogenide Lett. · 2012 · 9 · 517