journal article·2017-03-03

Role of oxygen pressure on the structural, morphological and optical properties of c-Al2O3 films deposited by thermal evaporator

Ijaz Ahmad Khan, Noureen Amna, Nosheen Kanwal, Maleeha Razzaq, Amjad Farid, Nasir Amin, Uzma Ikhlaq, Murtaza Saleem, Riaz Ahmad

Materials Research Express· Volume 4· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Aluminum oxide (c-Al2O3) films are deposited for various (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 mbar) oxygen pressures on glass substrates by thermal evaporator. The x-ray diffraction patterns exhibit the development of single diffraction peak related to c-Al2O3 phase which grows along (2 2 0) orientation up to 1.5 mbar pressure. For 2 mbar pressure, the deposited film becomes amorphous because no diffraction peak is observed. A minimum FWHM and maximum crystallite size of c-Al2O3 (2 2 0) plane is observed for 1 mbar pressure. The enhanced crystallite size of c-Al2O3 (2 2 0) plane is responsible to decrease the dislocation density and residual stresses developed during the deposition process. The field emission scanning electron microscopic analysis reveals the formation of smooth, uniform and compact films showing uniform distribution of nano-particles of different shapes and sizes. The energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopic analysis confirms the presence of Al whose content is decreased with the increase of oxygen pressures. The ellipsometric analysis confirms that the refractive index and the thickness of c-Al2O3 film deposited for 0.5 mbar pressure are found to 1.685 and 124.43 nm respectively. In short, the crystal structure, surface morphology, film thickness and refractive index of c-Al2O3 films are associated with the increase of oxygen pressures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · ZnO doping and properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.19310.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.193 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.302109110.1063/1.3021091 ↗
3. 10.1021/am405558910.1021/am4055589 ↗
4. Schmidt J · Proc. of Int. Conf. on Photovoltaic Solar Energy, 19th European · 2004 · 391
5. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.06.20110.1016/j.egypro.2011.06.201 ↗
6. 10.1186/1556-276X-7-110.1186/1556-276X-7-1 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00438-810.1016/S0040-6090(02)00438-8 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.315312310.1063/1.3153123 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2012.06.01210.1016/j.vacuum.2012.06.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01232-210.1016/S0040-6090(98)01232-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.susc.2005.05.05110.1016/j.susc.2005.05.051 ↗
12. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-11410.1186/1556-276X-8-114 ↗
13. 10.1186/s11671-015-0757-y10.1186/s11671-015-0757-y ↗
14. 10.1021/cm030454610.1021/cm0304546 ↗
15. Dobrzański L A · Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. · 2013 · 51 · 13
16. 10.3762/bjnano.4.8210.3762/bjnano.4.82 ↗
17. Dobrzański L A · Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2014 · 67 · 24
18. 10.1051/epjap/201515016410.1051/epjap/2015150164 ↗
19. 10.1080/1478643560823807410.1080/14786435608238074 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00339-002-1497-210.1007/s00339-002-1497-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.03.00610.1016/j.mseb.2010.03.006 ↗
22. Khan Z R · Mater. Sci. Appl. · 2011 · 2 · 340
23. Cullity B D · Elements of X-ray Diffraction · 2001
24. 10.1023/A:101851883276210.1023/A:1018518832762 ↗
25. 10.1116/1.131625610.1116/1.1316256 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0040-6090(96)08855-410.1016/S0040-6090(96)08855-4 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.220074110.1063/1.2200741 ↗
28. Berginski M · Proc. of Int. Conf. on Photovoltaic Solar Energy · 2007 · 2079
29. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.02010.1016/j.solmat.2012.02.020 ↗