journal article·2021-01-01Open access

Challenges and solutions for fabrication of three-dimensional cocultures of neural cell-loaded biomimetic constructs

Ulises A. Aregueta Robles, Penny J. Martens, Laura A. Poole-Warren

Biointerphases· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Fabrication of three-dimensional (3D) constructs to model body tissues and organs can contribute to research into tissue development and models for studying disease, as well as supporting preclinical drug screening in vitro. Furthermore, 3D constructs can also be used for diagnosis and therapy of disease conditions via lab on a chip and microarrays for diagnosis and engineered products for tissue repair, replacement, and regeneration. While cell culture approaches for studying tissue development and disease in two dimensions are long-established, the translation of this knowledge into 3D environments remains a fertile field of research. In this Tutorial, we specifically focus on the application of biosynthetic hydrogels for neural cell encapsulation. The Tutorial briefly covers background on using biosynthetic hydrogels for cell encapsulation, as well as common fabrication techniques. The Methods section focuses on the hydrogel design and characterization, highlighting key elements and tips for more effective approaches. Coencapsulation of different cell types, and the challenges associated with different growth and maintenance requirements, is the main focus of this Tutorial. Much care is needed to blend different cell types, and this Tutorial provides tips and insights that have proven successful for 3D coculture in biosynthetic hydrogels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Pluripotent Stem Cells Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales , Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Cell. Mol. Med. · 2006 · 1 · 56910.2755/jcmm010.003.20 ↗
2. Nature · 2018 · 553 · 43710.1038/nature25032 ↗
3. Nature · 2018 · 557 · 33510.1038/s41586-018-0089-z ↗
4. J. Cell Biol. · 2017 · 216 · 3110.1083/jcb.201610056 ↗
5. J. Burn Care Rehabil. · 1993 · 14 · 48510.1097/00004630-199309000-00001 ↗
6. Exp. Cell Res. · 2013 · 319 · 246010.1016/j.yexcr.2013.07.001 ↗
7. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2020 · 21 · 57110.1038/s41580-020-0259-3 ↗
8. Cell Stem Cell · 2016 · 18 · 2510.1016/j.stem.2015.12.005 ↗
9. Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2009 · 103 · 65510.1002/bit.22361 ↗
10. Biomaterials · 2010 · 31 · 362210.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.077 ↗
11. Biofabrication · 2015 · 7 · 2500910.1088/1758-5090/7/2/025009 ↗
12. Acta Biomater. · 2019 · 96 · 35410.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.010 ↗
13. Macromol. Biosci. · 2015 · 15 · 142310.1002/mabi.201500121 ↗
14. Trends Mol. Med. · 2002 · 8 · 33410.1016/S1471-4914(02)02365-1 ↗
15. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. · 2013 · 15 · 22710.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150045 ↗
16. Macromol. Biosci. · 2015 · 16 · 53510.1002/mabi.201500336 ↗
17. J. R. Soc. Interface · 2014 · 11 · 110.1098/rsif.2014.0247 ↗
18. Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 667210.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.006 ↗
19. Biomaterials · 2001 · 22 · 107710.1016/S0142-9612(00)00350-1 ↗
20. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. · 2004 · 15 · 152110.1163/1568562042459698 ↗
21. J. Neural Eng. · 2007 · 4 · 2610.1088/1741-2560/4/2/003 ↗
22. Neuroreport · 2002 · 13 · 241110.1097/00001756-200212200-00007 ↗
23. Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 359610.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.005 ↗
24. J. Biomech. · 2012 · 45 · 255610.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.035 ↗
25. Chem. Rev. · 2001 · 101 · 186910.1021/cr000108x ↗
26. 2005
27. Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 709710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.005 ↗
28. Acta Biomater. · 2005 · 1 · 24310.1016/j.actbio.2004.11.003 ↗
29. 2010
30. 2010
31. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2008 · 60 · 12410.1016/j.addr.2007.08.034 ↗
32. Tissue Eng. Part B · 2016 · 22 · 3410.1089/ten.teb.2015.0140 ↗
33. Nat. Biotechnol. · 2005 · 23 · 4710.1038/nbt1055 ↗
34. Acta Biomater. · 2005 · 1 · 46110.1016/j.actbio.2005.03.002 ↗
35. Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 465810.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.011 ↗
36. Adv. Sci. · 2020 · 7 · 110.1002/advs.201902953 ↗
37. Biomater Res. · 2018 · 22 · 110.1186/s40824-018-0122-1 ↗
38. Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2013 · 42 · 733510.1039/C3CS60040H ↗
39. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 1003010.1002/anie.200801313 ↗
40. Org. Biomol. Chem. · 2015 · 13 · 952810.1039/C5OB01457C ↗
41. Macromol. Symp. · 2008 · 266 · 5910.1002/masy.200850611 ↗
42. Macromol. Biosci. · 2012 · 12 · 32210.1002/mabi.201100292 ↗
43. Biomacromolecules · 2012 · 13 · 241010.1021/bm300671s ↗
44. Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 996910.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.020 ↗
45. Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 968510.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.083 ↗
46. 1998
47. 2013
48. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1976 · 73 · 242410.1073/pnas.73.7.2424 ↗
49. J. Neurosci. Res. · 1993 · 35 · 58510.1002/jnr.490350603 ↗
50. Cancer Res. · 1973 · 33 · 2643
51. Biomaterials · 2016 · 91 · 2310.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.011 ↗
52. Environ. Health Perspect. · 1989 · 80 · 1510.1289/ehp.8980127 ↗
53. Adv. Cell. Neurobiol. · 1982 · 3 · 37310.1016/B978-0-12-008303-9.50016-5 ↗
54. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B · 1996 · 351 · 38910.1098/rstb.1996.0033 ↗
55. Brain Res. · 1983 · 280 · 26310.1016/0006-8993(83)90056-2 ↗
56. Acta Biomater. · 2019 · 9510.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.044 ↗
57. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2015 · 132 · 4214210.1002/app.42142 ↗
58. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2018 · 56 · 27310.1002/polb.24558 ↗
59. Biosci. Rep. · 1987 · 7 · 68110.1007/BF01116861 ↗
60. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. · 1991 · 14 · 45310.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.002321 ↗
61. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. · 1993 · 3 · 80510.1016/0959-4388(93)90157-T ↗
62. EMBO J. · 1987 · 6 · 89110.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04835.x ↗
63. Mol. Neurobiol. · 1997 · 14 · 6710.1007/BF02740621 ↗
64. PLoS One · 2012 · 7 · e5182410.1371/journal.pone.0051824 ↗
65. Stem Cells · 2003 · 21 · 5010.1634/stemcells.21-1-50 ↗
66. J. Neurosci. Methods · 1994 · 52 · 11910.1016/0165-0270(94)90120-1 ↗
67. J. Cell Biol. · 1987 · 105 · 102310.1083/jcb.105.2.1023 ↗
68. J. Cell Biol. · 1983 · 97 · 47310.1083/jcb.97.2.473 ↗
69. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. · 2011 · 3 · 110.1101/cshperspect.a005108 ↗
70. Polymer · 2013 · 54 · 178610.1016/j.polymer.2013.01.050 ↗
71. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. · 2005 · 6 · 67110.1038/nrn1746 ↗
72. BMC Neurosci. · 2009 · 10 · 12210.1186/1471-2202-10-122 ↗
73. Open J. Anim. Sci. · 2013 · 03 · 24210.4236/ojas.2013.33036 ↗
74. MRS Commun. · 2017 · 7 · 48710.1557/mrc.2017.44 ↗
75. Eur. J. Neurosci. · 2008 · 28 · 151810.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06415.x ↗
76. Cell · 2014 · 157 · 72610.1016/j.cell.2014.03.042 ↗
77. Stem Cells Transl. Med. · 2014 · 3 · 141810.5966/sctm.2014-0102 ↗
78. Anim. Model. Exp. Med. · 2019 · 2 · 15010.1002/ame2.12077 ↗
79. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2020 · 6 · 147610.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01624 ↗
80. See the supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/6.0000700 for a list of materials and reagents, the immunostaining protocol used for observing encapsulated cells, the technique for measuring differences in ECM expression (Fig. S1), and electrophysiological activity of PC12 cells (Figs. S2 and S3).