Quantum Conductance in MoO3/TiO2 Heterojunction Memristors: Crafting Controlled Analog-to-Digital Transition for Multilevel Memory Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Functional materials showing quantized conductance during resistive switching are needed for the development of future technologies based on quantum phenomena. The precise control of quantum jumps during conductance is required to achieve such technologies. Here, we report a solution-processed bilayer Au/MoO 3 /TiO 2 /FTO resistive switching device showing an excellent memory window and long endurance (∼5000 cycles). Process-induced oxygen vacancies form the conduction filament, resulting in abrupt jumps in the conductance. By controlling the optimized scan rate, a transition from analog to digital switching is achieved. The SET process can be controlled by means of bias scan range and scan speed, exhibiting quantized conductance levels. Histogram of the quantized conductance reveals the SET process proceeds with nG 0 jumps (∼ n = 1 – 6). Our results show that such bilayer systems can be utilized for next-generation multibit storage devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences
Vellore Institute of Technology
Centre for Functional Materials
Green Energy Materials Laboratory, Department of Physics and Nanotechnology
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPROC.1998.65876210.1109/JPROC.1998.658762 ↗
2. 10.1109/JSSC.1974.105051110.1109/JSSC.1974.1050511 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20220124810.1002/adma.202201248 ↗
4. 10.1002/aelm.20200043910.1002/aelm.202000439 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41578-019-0159-310.1038/s41578-019-0159-3 ↗
6. 10.1109/TCT.1971.108333710.1109/TCT.1971.1083337 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature0693210.1038/nature06932 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8FD90058B10.1039/C8FD90058B ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20090037510.1002/adma.200900375 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20241391610.1002/adma.202413916 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-024-47228-110.1038/s41467-024-47228-1 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41699-021-00284-310.1038/s41699-021-00284-3 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41565-024-01794-z10.1038/s41565-024-01794-z ↗
14. 10.1021/acssensors.1c0184010.1021/acssensors.1c01840 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0407310.1021/acs.nanolett.3c04073 ↗
16. 10.1002/aisy.20210027310.1002/aisy.202100273 ↗
17. 10.1002/aisy.20220035810.1002/aisy.202200358 ↗
18. Zanotti, T.; Ranjan, A.; O’Shea, S. J.; Raghavan, N.; Thamankar, R.; Pey, K. L.; Puglisi, F. M. Reliability Analysis of Random Telegraph Noisebased True Random Number Generators. In 2023 IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop (IIRW), 2023; pp 1–6.10.1109/IIRW59383.2023.10477697 ↗
19. 10.1039/D4NR02673J10.1039/D4NR02673J ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-023-33752-510.1038/s41598-023-33752-5 ↗
21. 10.1039/D3RA07757H10.1039/D3RA07757H ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.16176710.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161767 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.475758410.1063/1.4757584 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.13031710.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.130317 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15524610.1016/j.cej.2024.155246 ↗
26. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/25/25520110.1088/0957-4484/24/25/255201 ↗
27. 10.1038/nmat202310.1038/nmat2023 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.512910110.1063/1.5129101 ↗
29. 10.1038/2739910.1038/27399 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep0270810.1038/srep02708 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.491625910.1063/1.4916259 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.16516010.1103/PhysRevB.94.165160 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8TC04395G10.1039/C8TC04395G ↗
34. 10.1063/1.477669510.1063/1.4776695 ↗
35. 10.1557/jmr.2017.25410.1557/jmr.2017.254 ↗
36. 10.1021/nl501249q10.1021/nl501249q ↗
37. 10.1109/LED.2013.228215410.1109/LED.2013.2282154 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.7b0352710.1021/acsami.7b03527 ↗
39. 10.1039/D0CP03767B10.1039/D0CP03767B ↗
40. 10.1038/ncomms1114210.1038/ncomms11142 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.482123710.1063/1.4821237 ↗
42. 10.7567/JJAP.55.08PB0210.7567/JJAP.55.08PB02 ↗
43. Zhang, T.; Sun, K.; Zeimpekis, I.; Huang, R. Improved switching performance of a Molybdenum Oxide-based bi-layer resistive memory. In 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Nanotechnology (NANO), 2022; pp 575–578.10.1109/NANO54668.2022.9928600 ↗
44. 10.1038/nnano.2009.45610.1038/nnano.2009.456 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41598-017-17785-110.1038/s41598-017-17785-1 ↗
46. 10.1088/1361-6528/acb21710.1088/1361-6528/acb217 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsaenm.3c0053510.1021/acsaenm.3c00535 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0447910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04479 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c0142910.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c01429 ↗
50. 10.1039/D0NA00780C10.1039/D0NA00780C ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13692410.1016/j.cej.2022.136924 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.05310.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.053 ↗
53. 10.1002/adma.20110477110.1002/adma.201104771 ↗
54. 10.1002/smtd.20190082310.1002/smtd.201900823 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10853-018-03227-410.1007/s10853-018-03227-4 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0016110.1021/acsaelm.2c00161 ↗
57. 10.1039/c3nr00476g10.1039/c3nr00476g ↗
58. 10.1038/srep3695310.1038/srep36953 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0049510.1021/acsaelm.2c00495 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.10199910.1016/j.mtchem.2024.101999 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.01402710.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.014027 ↗
62. 10.1039/C5NR03314D10.1039/C5NR03314D ↗
63. 10.1088/1361-6528/aab6a310.1088/1361-6528/aab6a3 ↗
64. 10.1063/5.014740310.1063/5.0147403 ↗
65. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0112010.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01120 ↗
66. 10.1039/C9RA00726A10.1039/C9RA00726A ↗