Differently mobile twin boundaries and magnetic shape memory effect in 10M martensite of Ni–Mn–Ga
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We investigated twin boundaries with sharply different mobility or twinning stress in five-layered modulated (10 M) martensite of Ni–Mn–Ga exhibiting magnetic shape memory effect or magnetically induced reorientation. Different mobility is ascribed to the different microstructures of the macrotwin planar interface. In monoclinic approximation the mobile boundaries are of Type I and Type II with complex microstructure of adjoining variants. These boundaries respond differently to magnetic field. For Type II boundary the reorientation takes place at very low field 250 Oe.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Magnetic shape memory phenomena
2. Kainuma · Nature · 2006 · 439 · 95710.1038/nature04493 ↗
3. Thomas · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 370810.1002/adma.200900469 ↗
4. Ullakko · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
5. Sozinov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 174610.1063/1.1458075 ↗
6. Likhachev · Mech. Mater. · 2006 · 38 · 55110.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.022 ↗
7. Heczko · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 290–291 · 78710.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.397 ↗
8. Straka · J. Magn. Magn. · 2005 · 290–291 · 82910.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.375 ↗
9. Heczko · IEEE Trans. Mag. · 2000 · 36 · 326610.1109/20.908764 ↗
10. Straka · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 14190210.1063/1.3573860 ↗
11. Liebermann · Acta Metal. · 1977 · 25 · 71510.1016/0001-6160(77)90086-4 ↗
12. Straka · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 13190310.1063/1.3373608 ↗
13. Kellis · J. Crystal Growth · 2012 · 359 · 6410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.08.014 ↗
14. Bhattacharya · 2003
15. Straka · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 745010.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.020 ↗
16. Heczko · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 62210.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.007 ↗
17. Kaufmann · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 145702910.1103/PhysRevLett.104.145702 ↗
18. Niemann · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2012 · 14 · 56210.1002/adem.201200058 ↗
19. Matsuda · Mater. Trans. · 2012 · 53 · 90210.2320/matertrans.M2012002 ↗
20. Martynov · J. Phys. III France · 1992 · 2 · 73910.1051/jp3:1992155 ↗
21. Lanska · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 807410.1063/1.1748860 ↗
22. Straka · Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 2510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.03.012 ↗
23. Chulist at · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 06351710.1063/1.4754017 ↗
24. Ge · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2006 · 438–440 · 96110.1016/j.msea.2005.12.057 ↗
25. Chulist · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 191310.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.012 ↗
26. Seiner · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2013
27. Heczko · J. App. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 713910.1063/1.1626800 ↗
28. Okamoto · J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2006 · 51 · 31510.1088/1742-6596/51/1/073 ↗
29. Straka · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 549210.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.020 ↗
30. Mullner · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 153110.1063/1.1639144 ↗