Effect of different doping methods on microstructure and photo-catalytic activity of Ag2O–TiO2 nanofibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ag+ doping TiO2 nanofibers were prepared by in-situ and immersion methods (named as SI-TiO2 and IM-TiO2 nanofibers, respectively). This paper assesses the effects of the two different doping methods on the material properties. Results show that the two kinds of nanofibers with the diameter of about 20 nm are micron-sized length, and covered by nano-balls of Ag2O with the diameter of 2–5 nm. Compared to IM-TiO2 nanofibers, the SI-TiO2 nanofibers have fewer Ag2O particles. Thus, the photo-catalytic activity of IM-TiO2 nanofibers is higher than SI-TiO2 nanofibers, which is also proved in photo-catalysis experiment (the degradation ratio of IM-TiO2 catalyst is 100%, and the degradation ratio of SI-TiO2 catalyst is 95%).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Ichiura · Chemosphere · 2002 · 51 · 85510.1016/S0045-6535(03)00049-3 ↗
2. Paola · Catal. Today · 2002 · 75 · 8710.1016/S0920-5861(02)00048-2 ↗
3. Yamashita · Catal. Today · 2003 · 84 · 19110.1016/S0920-5861(03)00273-6 ↗
4. Kumar · Ionics · 2009 · 15 · 57910.1007/s11581-008-0304-2 ↗
5. Yukiko · Chemosphere · 2006 · 62 · 14910.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.061 ↗
6. Zhang · Mater. Lett. · 2007 · 61 · 483910.1016/j.matlet.2007.03.054 ↗
7. Li · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2008 · 148 · 18310.1016/j.mseb.2007.09.012 ↗
8. Xu · J. Photchem. Photobiol. A: Chem. · 2000 · 133 · 6710.1016/S1010-6030(00)00220-3 ↗
9. Stathatos · Langmuir · 2001 · 17 · 502510.1021/la0103620 ↗
10. Zhang · Chemosphere · 2004 · 54 · 40510.1016/S0045-6535(03)00588-5 ↗
11. Yin · Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. · 2005 · 169 · 8910.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.05.038 ↗
12. Xia · Chem. Ind. Eng. · 2005 · 56 · 1666
13. Zhou · J. Central South Univ. · 2005 · 12 · 65710.1007/s11771-005-0064-3 ↗
14. Zhou · Mater. Lett. · 2005 · 59 · 311510.1016/j.matlet.2005.05.030 ↗
15. Lukac · Appl. Catal. B: Environ. · 2007 · 74 · 8310.1016/j.apcatb.2007.01.014 ↗
16. Hu · Mater. Lett. · 2008 · 62 · 457910.1016/j.matlet.2008.08.051 ↗
17. Ksibi · Mater. Lett. · 2008 · 62 · 420410.1016/j.matlet.2008.06.026 ↗
18. Yu · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 3803
19. Burdeaux · J. Electron. Mater. · 1990 · 19 · 135710.1007/BF02662825 ↗
20. Shi · Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. · 2008 · 24 · 00110.1016/S1872-1508(08)60001-7 ↗
21. Tan · Chem. Eng. J. · 2003 · 95 · 17910.1016/S1385-8947(03)00103-7 ↗
22. Hou · Chem. Eng. · 2009 · 146 · 4210.1016/j.cej.2008.05.041 ↗
23. Jurgen · Eur. J. Phys. · 2007 · 28 · 49310.1088/0143-0807/28/3/010 ↗
24. Deanna · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 1648310.1021/jp047097m ↗
25. Wilker · J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. · 1999 · 121 · 4910.1016/S1010-6030(98)00452-3 ↗
26. Zhao · Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. · 2007 · 23 · 100310.3866/PKU.WHXB20070708 ↗