Effect of electric field on thermal performance of thermosyphon heat pipes using nanofluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In the present study the effect of electric field on thermal performance of two-phase closed thermosyphon as external modifications has experimentally investigated. Internal modifications applied by using two different water based nanofluids as working fluids. Nanofluids prepared by adding Al2O3 and CuO nanoparticles into the pure water using ultrasonic vibration system without adding any dispersant or stabilizer to prevent any possible change of chemical properties of the nanofluid. Results show that the thermal performance, and the Nusselt number ratio of thermosyphon gradually increase by increase in electric field intensity and nanofluids concentration. These values decrease by increasing in input power. Results also show that Al2O3/water nanofluid improves thermal performance of thermosyphon more than CuO/water nanofluid. Also, the experimental results indicate that the effect of nanoparticles on thermosyphon thermal performance is higher than the electric field. Maximum enhancement of Nusselt number ratio is about 43% that observed at 60 W input power and 2.5% by volume of Al2O3 nanoparticles in the work fluid under 20 V electrical field strength. Enhancement value is 39% for CuO/water nanofluid.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies · Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Heat Transfer Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Noie · Applied Thermal Engineering · 2005 · 25 · 49510.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.06.019 ↗
2. Long · Cryogenics · 2012 · 52 · 6610.1016/j.cryogenics.2011.11.004 ↗
3. DenHartog · Cold Regions Science and Technology · 1988 · 15 · 31910.1016/0165-232X(88)90078-X ↗
4. Salehi · Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer · 2011 · 18 · 26110.1615/JEnhHeatTransf.v18.i3.70 ↗
5. Nyce · Journal of Crystal Growth · 1991 · 110 · 5210.1016/0022-0248(91)90865-3 ↗
6. Amatachaya · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2010 · 37 · 29310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.11.004 ↗
7. Wang · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2012 · 39 · 39010.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.01.015 ↗
8. Leong · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2012 · 39 · 52310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.01.014 ↗
9. Dube · Applied Thermal Engineering · 2004 · 24 · 243910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.02.013 ↗
10. Firouzfar · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · 2012 · 9 · 58710.1007/s13762-012-0051-9 ↗
11. Omidvarborna · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2009 · 36 · 28610.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.10.014 ↗
12. Laohalertdecha · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2007 · 11 · 85810.1016/j.rser.2005.07.002 ↗
13. Shakouri Pour · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · 2011 · 35 · 138310.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.05.006 ↗
14. Wangnipparnto · Energy Conversion and Management · 2002 · 43 · 179110.1016/S0196-8904(01)00136-4 ↗
15. Cotton · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · 2012 · 41 · 3110.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.003 ↗
16. F. Asadzadeh, M. Nasr Esfahany, N. Etesami, International Journal of Thermal Sciences.
17. Senflleben · Zeitschrift für Physik · 1931 · 32 · 550
18. Poutler · 1984 · 707
19. Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena
20. Alamgholilou · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · 2012 · 38 · 6110.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.11.008 ↗
21. Choi · ASME FED · 1995 · 66 · 99
22. Soltani · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2010 · 37 · 2910.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.08.005 ↗
23. Kobayashi · Chemical Engineering & Technology · 2012 · 35 · 186510.1002/ceat.201200044 ↗
24. Huminic · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · 2011 · 35 · 55010.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.12.009 ↗
25. Noie · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · 2009 · 30 · 70010.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2009.03.001 ↗
26. Zeinali Heris · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2011 · 38 · 147010.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.08.004 ↗
27. Huminic · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · 2011 · 54 · 65610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.09.005 ↗
28. Tadjarodi · Materials Research Bulletin · 2013 · 48 · 415010.1016/j.materresbull.2013.06.043 ↗
29. Munkhbayar · Materials Research Bulletin · 2012 · 47 · 418710.1016/j.materresbull.2012.08.073 ↗
30. Khadangi Mahrood · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2011 · 38 · 144910.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.08.012 ↗
31. Chami · Energy and Buildings · 2010 · 42 · 126710.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.019 ↗
32. Lajvardi · 2007 · 541
33. Alizadehdakhel · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2010 · 37 · 31210.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2009.09.002 ↗
34. Rahimi · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2010 · 37 · 70310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.02.006 ↗
35. Tsai · Journal of Hydrology · 2010 · 380 · 410.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.010 ↗
36. Maki · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · 2003 · 27 · 89110.1016/S0894-1777(03)00061-X ↗
37. Daungthongsuk · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2007 · 11 · 79710.1016/j.rser.2005.06.005 ↗
38. Holman · 1989
39. Zeinali Heris · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · 2006 · 33 · 52910.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2006.01.005 ↗