journal article·2024-12

Modeling the dependence of electrolyte design on lithium-sulfur battery performance

Ayca Firtin, Kagan Yuksel, Elena V. Karaseva, Elena V. Kuzmina, Vladimir S. Kolosnitsyn, Damla Eroglu

Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, we offer two electrochemical models, a zero-dimensional (0-D) and a one-dimensional (1-D) model, to mechanistically explore the impact of the electrolyte-to-sulfur (E/S) ratio and electrolyte properties on the discharge behavior of a lithium-sulfur (Li-S) cell. The electrochemically active area in both models is defined based on the carbon weight fraction and reference porosity, so the influence of the carbon loading and E/S ratio on the reaction kinetics is included. Mass transfer of the species must be considered to model the reliance of the discharge capacity on the current density. Instead, the 0-D model is more responsive to the influence of the E/S ratio on the discharge capacity. The effect of electrolyte properties can be modeled implicitly through model parameters. The 0-D model is less sensitive to the variance in model parameters than the 1-D model in terms of the predicted capacity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. New high donor electrolyte for lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/adma.202005022 ↗
2. Influence of sulfur loading on lithium-sulfur battery performance for different cathode carbon types10.1002/slct.202203944 ↗
3. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage10.1038/nmat3191 ↗
4. The effect of high sulfur loading on the electrochemical performance10.1149/08513.0295ecst ↗
5. Nanoengineering to achieve high efficiency practical lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/C9NH00730J ↗
6. A Li-Li2S4 battery with improved discharge capacity and cycle life at low electrolyte/sulfur ratios10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.029 ↗
7. Electrodeposition kinetics in Li-S batteries: effects of low electrolyte/sulfur ratios and deposition surface composition10.1149/2.0051706jes ↗
8. Electrolyte measures to prevent polysulfide shuttle in lithium-sulfur batteries10.1002/batt.202200097 ↗
9. Solvent effects on polysulfide redox kinetics and ionic conductivity in lithium-sulfur batteries10.1149/2.1181614jes ↗
10. Understanding the effects of the low-concentration electrolyte on the performance of high-energy-density Li–S batteries10.1021/acsami.1c07883 ↗
11. Cathode–electrolyte interfacial processes in lithium∥sulfur batteries under lean electrolyte conditions10.1021/acsami.1c08615 ↗
12. Characterization of the effect of cell design on Li−S battery resistance using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy10.1002/celc.202100165 ↗
13. Assessment of Li-S battery performance as a function of electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio10.1149/1945-7111/abe7a2 ↗
14. Progress on the critical parameters for lithium–sulfur batteries to be practically viable10.1002/adfm.201801188 ↗
15. Effect of electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio in the cell on the Li-S battery performance10.1149/2.0621908jes ↗
16. Modeling the effect of key cathode design parameters on the electrochemical performance of a lithium-sulfur battery10.1002/er.4045 ↗
17. Critical link between materials chemistry and cell-level design for high energy density and low cost lithium-sulfur transportation battery10.1149/2.0611506jes ↗
18. The mechanism of effect of support salt concentration in electrolyte on performance of lithium-sulfur cells10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.019 ↗
19. Effect of electrolyte composition on performance and stability of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/ente.201900197 ↗
20. A rational balance design of hybrid electrolyte based on ionic liquid and fluorinated ether in lithium sulfur batteries10.1149/2.0321912jes ↗
21. Sulfolane-based highly concentrated electrolytes of lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide: ionic transport, Li-Ion coordination, and Li–S battery performance10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02625 ↗
22. The effect of lithium bis(oxalato)borate on the galvanostatic charge–discharge cycling of lithium electrode in sulfolane solutions of lithium perchlorate10.1134/S102319352201013X ↗
23. Lithium iodide as a promising electrolyte additive for lithium–sulfur batteries: mechanisms of performance enhancement10.1002/adma.201404194 ↗
24. Binary sulfone/ether-based electrolytes for rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.007 ↗
25. Chelate effects in Glyme/Lithium Bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide solvate ionic liquids, part 2: importance of solvate-structure stability for electrolytes of lithium batteries10.1021/jp504099q ↗
26. Parameter identification and sensitivity analysis for zero-dimensional physics-based lithium-sulfur battery models
27. A mathematical model for a lithium–sulfur cell10.1149/1.2937304 ↗
28. How to model the cathode area in lithium-sulfur batteries?10.1002/celc.202101553 ↗
29. Modeling the discharge behavior of a lithium-sulfur battery10.1002/er.5701 ↗
30. Toward rigorous validation of Li-S battery models10.1149/1945-7111/ac7750 ↗
31. A zero dimensional model of lithium–sulfur batteries during charge and discharge10.1039/C5CP05755H ↗
32. Modeling the voltage loss mechanisms in lithium–sulfur cells: the importance of electrolyte resistance and precipitation kinetics10.1039/C5CP03566J ↗
33. Sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model of lithium–sulfur cells part I: applied discharge current and cathode conductivity10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.135 ↗
34. Akin solid–solid biphasic conversion of a Li–S battery achieved by coordinated carbonate electrolytes10.1039/C9TA02877C ↗
35. Polymer electrolytes for Li-S batteries: polymeric fundamentals and performance optimization10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.009 ↗
36. Phosphorus vacancies as effective polysulfide promoter for high-energy-density lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/aenm.202102739 ↗
37. Built-In catalysis in confined nanoreactors for high-loading Li–S batteries10.1021/acsnano.9b09231 ↗
38. Effect of cations in ionic liquids on the electrochemical performance of lithium-sulfur batteries10.1007/s11426-014-5154-3 ↗
39. Effects of polysulfide solubility and Li ion transport on performance of Li–S batteries using sparingly solvating electrolytes10.1149/1945-7111/ab7a81 ↗
40. The failure mechanism of lithium-sulfur batteries under lean-ether-electrolyte conditions10.1016/j.ensm.2021.03.014 ↗
41. Effect of electrolyte on high sulfur loading Li-S batteries10.1149/2.0071803jes ↗
42. High capacity of lithium-sulfur batteries at low electrolyte/sulfur ratio enabled by an organosulfide containing electrolyte10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.057 ↗
43. Lithium–sulfur redox: challenges and opportunities
44. Solvate ionic liquid electrolyte for Li–S batteries10.1149/2.111308jes ↗
45. Dual functional high donor electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries under lithium nitrate free and lean electrolyte conditions10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00874 ↗
46. Recent progress in high donor electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/aenm.202001456 ↗
47. Unifying the clustering kinetics of lithium polysulfides with the nucleation behavior of Li 2 S in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/D1TA02779D ↗
48. Structure–property relationships of organic electrolytes and their effects on Li/S battery performance10.1002/adma.201700449 ↗