journal article·2020-01

Upconversion luminescence quenching mechanism of single Au nanoparticles decorated NaYF4: Yb3+, Er3+ hexagonal disk

Enjie He, Junjun Yu, Chi Wang, Yi Jiang, Xuzhong Zuo, Bing Xu, Jun Wen, Yanfu Qin, Zhaojin Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Different amounts of Au nanoparticles decorated NaYF4: Yb3+, Er3+ hexagonal disks were synthesized by using a hydrothermal strategy. In comparsion with single NaYF4: Yb3+, Er3+ hexagonal disk, the average upconversion quenching factors for the green and red upconversion emission bands of single Au nanoparticles decorated hexagonal disk increased obviously with the increasing of the amounts of uploaded Au nanoparticles. The local field distribution accompanied with the enhancement factors were obtained by finite element method. Based on the cavity quantum optics theory, a quantitative analysis for the Au nanoparticles induced quenching was addressed. The results show that the presence of the higher mode Purcell factors induced nonradiative energy transfer from the upconverter to the Au nanoparticles, which contributed to the quenching significantly. The modest weakening of local fields only played a minor role. It could offer a novel theory guidance for the seeking of the novel plasmonic nanostructure-upconverter hybrid system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Ji · Nano Energy · 2019 · 61 · 21110.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.064 ↗
2. Liu · Nature · 2017 · 543 · 22910.1038/nature21366 ↗
3. Park · Adv. Func. Mater. · 2018 · 28
4. Hinamoto · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 1746510.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05211 ↗
5. Zheng · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 137910.1039/C4CS00178H ↗
6. Fan · Nano Today · 2019 · 25 · 6810.1016/j.nantod.2019.02.009 ↗
7. Prodi · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 492210.1039/C4CS00394B ↗
8. Homann · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2018 · 57 · 876510.1002/anie.201803083 ↗
9. Zong · Small · 2019
10. Klier · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 336310.1021/jp5103548 ↗
11. Liu · Nanoscale · 2018 · 10 · 2027910.1039/C8NR06968A ↗
12. Sun · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 181110.1038/s41467-019-09850-2 ↗
13. Liang · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10 · 139110.1038/s41467-019-09345-0 ↗
14. He · Light-Sci. Appl. · 2017 · 610.1038/lsa.2016.217 ↗
15. Yi · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 1304710.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02437 ↗
16. Zheng · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2019 · 113 · 20910.1016/j.materresbull.2019.01.030 ↗
17. Lei · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2019 · 115 · 24210.1016/j.materresbull.2019.03.018 ↗
18. Wu · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 402010.1021/jz5019042 ↗
19. Zong · Appl. Mater. Today · 2019 · 15 · 4310.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.015 ↗
20. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 853510.1039/C7TC02374J ↗
21. Zhou · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 1655910.1039/C7TA04943A ↗
22. Fischer · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 27110.1364/OE.20.000271 ↗
23. Lu · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 778010.1021/nn5011254 ↗
24. Zhou · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 516910.1021/acsnano.6b00649 ↗
25. Xue · Small · 2017 · 13
26. Alizadehkhaledi · ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 112510.1021/acsphotonics.9b00285 ↗
27. Li · J. Lumin. · 2019 · 206 · 21110.1016/j.jlumin.2018.10.079 ↗
28. Eriksen · J. Opt. · 2019 · 2110.1088/2040-8986/ab0272 ↗
29. Chen · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2015 · 3 · 829310.1039/C5TB01393C ↗
30. Liu · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 767110.1039/c1cc11179e ↗
31. Johnson · Phys. Rev. B · 1972 · 6 · 437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
32. Sokolov · Opt. Spectrosc. · 2015 · 118 · 60910.1134/S0030400X15040190 ↗
33. He · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2018 · 106 · 37910.1016/j.materresbull.2018.06.024 ↗
34. Itoh · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2017 · 46 · 390410.1039/C7CS00155J ↗
35. Fox · 1997
36. SÖnnichsen · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 8810.1103/PhysRevLett.88.077402 ↗