Dorsal and Ventral Stimuli in Cell–Material Interactions: Effect on Cell Morphology
Source abstract
Abstract
Cells behave differently between bidimensional (2D) and tridimensional (3D) environments. While most of the in vitro cultures are 2D, most of the in vivo extracellular matrices are 3D, which encourages the development of more relevant culture conditions, seeking to provide more physiological models for biomedicine (e.g., cancer, drug discovery and tissue engineering) and further insights into any dimension-dependent biological mechanism. In this study, cells were cultured between two protein coated surfaces (sandwich-like culture). Cells used both dorsal and ventral receptors to adhere and spread, undergoing morphological changes with respect to the 2D control. Combinations of fibronectin and bovine serum albumin on the dorsal and ventral sides led to different cell morphologies, which were quantified from bright field images by calculating the spreading area and circularity. Although the mechanism underlying these differences remains to be clarified, excitation of dorsal receptors by anchorage to extracellular proteins plays a key role on cell behavior. This approach—sandwich-like culture—becomes therefore a versatile method to study cell adhesion in well-defined conditions in a quasi 3D environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universitat Politècnica de València 1 Center for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, , Valencia, Spain
CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina 2 , Valencia, Spain
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 1978 · 273 · 34510.1038/273345a0 ↗
2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 1988 · 85 · 557610.1073/pnas.85.15.5576 ↗
3. Rev Mod Phys · 1959 · 31 · 44910.1103/RevModPhys.31.449 ↗
4. Cowdry · 1926
5. Rev Mod Phys · 1959 · 31 · 1110.1103/RevModPhys.31.11 ↗
6. J Cell Biol · 1975 · 67 · 40010.1083/jcb.67.2.400 ↗
7. J Cell Biol · 1972 · 54 · 62610.1083/jcb.54.3.626 ↗
8. Trends Cell Biol · 2003 · 13 · 26410.1016/S0962-8924(03)00057-6 ↗
9. Science · 2001 · 294 · 170810.1126/science.1064829 ↗
10. Nat Mat · 2010 · 9 · 9010.1038/nmat2619 ↗
11. Nat Biotech · 2005 · 23 · 4710.1038/nbt1055 ↗
12. Tissue Eng Part A · 2012 · 5–6 · 49910.1089/ten.tea.2011.0309 ↗
13. Curr Opin Biotech · 2012 · 23 · 110.1016/j.copbio.2012.01.011 ↗
14. PNAS · 2004 · 101 · 1802410.1073/pnas.0405747102 ↗
15. FASEB J · 1989 · 3 · 17410.1096/fasebj.3.2.2914628 ↗
16. Surgery · 1993 · 113 · 48
17. Anat Rec · 1995 · 242 · 33710.1002/ar.1092420307 ↗
18. Biotechnol Bioeng · 2011 · 108 · 196510.1002/bit.23113 ↗
19. Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 226510.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.078 ↗
20. Nat Cell Biol · 2010 · 12 · 59810.1038/ncb2062 ↗
21. Nat Cell Biol · 2011 · 13 · 310.1038/ncb0111-3 ↗
22. Nat Cell Biol · 2011 · 13 · 510.1038/ncb0111-5 ↗
23. Biomaterials · 2011 · 32 · 209910.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.057 ↗
24. J Mat Sci Mat Med · 1994 · 5 · 73210.1007/BF00120366 ↗
25. J Biomed Mat Res · 1996 · 30 · 38510.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199603)30:3<385::AID-JBM13>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
26. Mat Sci Mat Med · 2012 · 1 · 19510.1007/s10856-011-4532-z ↗
27. Nat Methods · 2009 · 6 · 38310.1038/nmeth.1320 ↗
28. Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 1089310.1021/la9012203 ↗
29. J Biomat Sci Polym E · 1997 · 8 · 72110.1163/156856297X00524 ↗
30. J Cell Sci · 1984 · 71 · 1710.1242/jcs.71.1.17 ↗
31. Plasma Process Poly · 2012 · 9 · 14910.1002/ppap.201100054 ↗
32. J Colloid Interf Sci · 1993 · 155 · 33410.1006/jcis.1993.1044 ↗
33. Cell Tissue Kinet · 1985 · 6 · 597
34. Radiat Res · 1986 · 1 · 6210.2307/3576970 ↗
35. Alpen EL · 1988 · 2 · 167