journal article·2021-12

Effect of oxygen stoichiometry on the threshold switching of RF-sputtered NbOx (x = 2.0–2.5) films

Jamal Aziz, Honggyun Kim, Shania Rehman, Ji-Hyun Hur, Yun-Heub Song, Muhammad Farooq Khan, Deok-kee Kim

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we report the Poole-Frenkel induced threshold switching characteristics of niobium dioxide (NbO2) films by tuning oxygen stoichiometry. Similar to correlated oxides, NbO2 is also found sensitive to oxygen related defects. The oxygen stoichiometry of NbO2 films was varied by changing the oxygen flux during its synthesis in reactive RF-sputter. Nb2O5 dominant phase of as-grown films was detected during Raman spectroscopy. For the reduction of Nb2O5 films, we chose tungsten as a top electrode due to its considerable oxygen affinity. After the required forming process, stable threshold switching was observed which is attributed to the reduction of Nb2O5 phase to NbO2 due to interfacial WOx layer formation between top electrode and Nb2O5. Increase of O2 flux during deposition leads to an increase in the selectivity, threshold voltage and off-state resistance. These devices showed good thermal stability up to 160 °C making them useful for RRAM and neuromorphic computing applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Nanoionics-based resistive switching memories10.1038/nmat2023 ↗
2. Pan · Mater. Sci. Eng. R-Rep. · 2014 · 83 · 110.1016/j.mser.2014.06.002 ↗
3. Won · J. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1018610.1038/s41598-017-10851-8 ↗
4. Rehman · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2019 · 7 · 72510.1039/C8TC04538K ↗
5. Patil · Nanomaterials · 2021 · 11 · 35910.3390/nano11020359 ↗
6. Chen · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2015 · 62 · 402210.1109/TED.2015.2492421 ↗
7. Liu · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2011 · 33 · 23610.1109/LED.2011.2174452 ↗
8. Gibson · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 10810.1063/1.4939913 ↗
9. Cha · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108
10. Jeong · Science · 2013 · 339 · 140210.1126/science.1230512 ↗
11. Fan · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2016 · 2810.1088/0953-8984/28/25/255002 ↗
12. Fan · RSC Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 1915110.1039/C8RA03292K ↗
13. Brito · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 9610.1103/PhysRevB.96.195102 ↗
14. Mikolajick · 2016 · 381
15. Chen · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2018 · 65 · 544810.1109/TED.2018.2873638 ↗
16. Aziz · Nanomaterials · 2020 · 10 · 216410.3390/nano10112164 ↗
17. Pickett · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 11410.1038/nmat3510 ↗
18. Gao · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111
19. Liu · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22
20. Aziz · J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 87910.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160385 ↗
21. Chekol · ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology · 2017 · 6 · P64110.1149/2.0311709jss ↗
22. Park · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 406810.1038/s41598-017-04529-4 ↗
23. Park · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 2422110.1021/acsami.9b04015 ↗
24. Sevic · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 11110.1063/1.5003168 ↗
25. Slesazeck · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 10231810.1039/C5RA19300A ↗
26. Slesazeck · 2016 · 1
27. Dash · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 3612910.1039/C5RA05074J ↗
28. Mozetič · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 213810.1002/adma.200500728 ↗
29. Zhao · J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 37 · 339210.1088/0022-3727/37/24/006 ↗
30. Sidorov · J. Appl. Spectrosc. · 2018 · 85 · 71710.1007/s10812-018-0710-9 ↗
31. Foroughi-Abari · Thin Solid Films · 2011 · 519 · 306810.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.036 ↗
32. Jehng · Chem. Mater. · 1991 · 3 · 10010.1021/cm00013a025 ↗
33. Wang · Appl. Catal. B · 2019 · 244 · 43810.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.066 ↗
34. Travnikov · J. Lumin. · 1990 · 47 · 10710.1016/0022-2313(90)90006-W ↗
35. Chen · Curr. Appl Phys. · 2011 · 11 · 84910.1016/j.cap.2010.12.005 ↗
36. Al-Baradi · Optik · 2018 · 168 · 85310.1016/j.ijleo.2018.05.020 ↗
37. Li · CrystEngComm · 2016 · 18 · 253210.1039/C5CE02069G ↗
38. Tamura · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. · 1974 · 410 · 31310.1002/zaac.19744100311 ↗
39. Panagopoulou · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 232 · 5410.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.128 ↗
40. Park · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 10810.1007/978-94-024-0841-6 ↗
41. Sharath · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 10410.1063/1.4864653 ↗
42. Schäfer · Z. Anorg. Allgemeine Chem. · 1969 · 365 · 3110.1002/zaac.19693650106 ↗
43. Yang · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20
44. Lin · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92
45. Sadaf · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2012 · 209 · 117910.1002/pssa.201127659 ↗
46. Beatham · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 1979 · 16 · 7710.1016/0368-2048(79)85006-9 ↗
47. Bousoulas · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 11510.1063/1.4862797 ↗
48. Schroeder · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117
49. McKenna · Microelectron. Eng. · 2011 · 88 · 127210.1016/j.mee.2011.03.024 ↗
50. Dannenberg · Thin Solid Films · 2000 · 360 · 12210.1016/S0040-6090(99)00938-4 ↗
51. Okram · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 8 · 412710.1166/jnn.2008.AN10 ↗
52. Kang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109
53. Islam · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105
54. Herzig · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 3410.1088/1361-6641/ab1da3 ↗
55. Kittel · 2004
56. Fang · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2010 · 31 · 47610.1109/LED.2010.2041893 ↗
57. Kim · Microelectron. Eng. · 2013 · 107 · 3310.1016/j.mee.2013.02.084 ↗
58. Li · 2014 · 138
59. Kim · 2012 · 155