journal article·2013-01

Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells based on HfO2 modified TiO2 electrodes

Parthiban Ramasamy, Moon-Sung Kang, Hyeon-Jung Cha, Jinkwon Kim

Materials Research Bulletin· Volume 48· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we describe the use of hafnium oxide (HfO 2 ) as a new and efficient blocking layer material to modify TiO 2 electrodes in dye sensitized solar cells. Different thicknesses of HfO 2 over-layers were prepared by simple dip coating from two different precursors and their effects on the performance of DSSCs were studied. The HfO 2 modification remarkably increases dye adsorption, resulting from the fact that the surface of HfO 2 is more basic than that of TiO 2 . Furthermore, the HfO 2 coating demonstrated increased diffusion coefficient ( D e ) and lifetime ( τ e ) of the photoelectrons, indicating the improved retardation of the back electron transfer, which increases short-circuit current ( J sc ) and open-circuit voltage ( V oc ). Thereby, the photo conversion efficiency ( η ) of the solar cell was greatly improved from 5.67 to 9.59% (an improvement of 69.02%) as the HfO 2 layer was coated over TiO 2 films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. O’Regan · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
2. Grätzel · Inorg. Chem. · 2005 · 44 · 684110.1021/ic0508371 ↗
3. Yella · Science · 2011 · 334 · 62910.1126/science.1209688 ↗
4. Chiba · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 45 · L63810.1143/JJAP.45.L638 ↗
5. Nazeeruddin · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1993 · 115 · 638210.1021/ja00067a063 ↗
6. Diamant · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 197710.1021/jp027827v ↗
7. Fabregat-Santiago · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 690310.1063/1.1812588 ↗
8. Chappel · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 333610.1021/la015536s ↗
9. Kay · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 293010.1021/cm0115968 ↗
10. Hod · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1001510.1021/jp101097j ↗
11. Palomares · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 125 · 47510.1021/ja027945w ↗
12. Bisquert · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 1355010.1021/ja047311k ↗
13. Nazeeruddin · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 898110.1021/jp022656f ↗
14. Diamant · Coord. Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 248 · 127110.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.003 ↗
15. Zhang · Nano Today · 2011 · 6 · 9110.1016/j.nantod.2010.12.007 ↗
16. Ting · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 214010.1021/la802944n ↗
17. Tulevski · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 1196410.1021/ja073647t ↗
18. Nakade · Langmuir · 2005 · 21 · 1080310.1021/la051257j ↗
19. Ahn · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 01310310.1063/1.2218831 ↗
20. Ahn · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 08431210.1063/1.2721976 ↗
21. Moulder · 1992
22. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database 20, Version 3.4, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), http://srdata.nist.gov/xps/.
23. Jung · Langmuir · 2005 · 21 · 1033210.1021/la051807d ↗
24. Zhang · J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. · 2008 · 197 · 26010.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.01.002 ↗