Effect of Ce doping on the resistance of Na over V2O5-WO3/TiO2 SCR catalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Enhanced performance of Ce doping on the catalytic activity of V 2 O 5 -WO 3 /TiO 2 catalysts and its resistance properties to Na poisoning have been investigated in the research. Different Na species (NaCl and Na 2 O) were deposited on CeO 2 -V 2 O 5 -WO 3 /TiO 2 catalysts by impregnation method. The results presented that CeO 2 -V 2 O 5 -WO 3 /TiO 2 catalysts exhibited a higher NH 3 -SCR activity and better Na resistance than the V 2 O 5 -WO 3 /TiO 2 catalyst, and its poisoning resistance to Na 2 O is more superior than to NaCl, caused by more acid sites over the 10%CeO 2 -V 2 O 5 -WO 3 /TiO 2 (Ce 10 VWTi) catalyst, which indicated that the poisoning resistance of Na 2 O on Ce 10 VWTi catalysts is higher than that of NaCl. Combined with the characterization results, the dopant of Ce could enhance the surface chemisorbed oxygen on the Na poisoning V 2 O 5 -WO 3 /TiO 2 catalysts, facilitate the redox cycle, and increase the intensity of acid sites due to the newly formed Bronsted acid sites stemmed from C e 3 + − N H 4 + , thereby promoting catalytic activity and Na poisoning resistance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Deng · ACS Catal. · 2016 · 6 · 580710.1021/acscatal.6b01121 ↗
2. Guan · Appl. Therm. Eng. · 2014 · 66 · 39510.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.021 ↗
3. Fu · Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 4 · 1410.1039/C3CY00414G ↗
4. Ma · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 760310.1021/jp200488p ↗
5. Peng · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 48 · 451510.1021/es405602a ↗
6. Xiaodong · Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. · 2013 · 7 · 42010.1007/s11783-013-0489-0 ↗
7. Jiang · Fuel · 2015 · 151 · 12410.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.061 ↗
8. Liu · Appl. Catal. B: Environ. · 2014 · 158–159 · 1110.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.049 ↗
9. Lee · Chem. Eng. J. · 2012 · 195–196 · 32310.1016/j.cej.2012.05.009 ↗
10. Chang · Catal. Commun. · 2012 · 27 · 5410.1016/j.catcom.2012.06.022 ↗
11. Liu · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 618210.1021/es3001773 ↗
12. Chen · Catal. Today · 2010 · 153 · 7710.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.062 ↗
13. Lee · Appl. Catal. B: Environ. · 2013 · 142–143 · 70510.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.071 ↗
14. Xiong · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2016 · 120 · 1529910.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05175 ↗
15. Gao · Chin. Sci. Bull. · 2014 · 59 · 396610.1007/s11434-014-0496-y ↗
16. Chen · Chem. Eng. J. · 2011 · 170 · 53110.1016/j.cej.2010.11.020 ↗
17. Guo · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 317 · 11110.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.082 ↗
18. Peng · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 1262310.1021/es302857a ↗
19. Liang Chen · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 2117710.1021/jp907109e ↗
20. Li · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 960010.1021/es301661r ↗
21. Hu · Chem. Eng. J. · 2016 · 293 · 11810.1016/j.cej.2016.02.095 ↗
22. Zhao · Chem. Eng. J. · 2013 · 228 · 81510.1016/j.cej.2013.05.056 ↗
23. Kong · Chem. Eng. J. · 2015 · 264 · 81510.1016/j.cej.2014.12.038 ↗
24. Besselmann · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 3 · 463310.1039/b105466j ↗
25. Chen · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 2117710.1021/jp907109e ↗
26. Larrubia · Appl. Catal. B: Environ. · 2000 · 27 · L14510.1016/S0926-3373(00)00150-8 ↗
27. Lietti · J. Catal. · 1999 · 187 · 41910.1006/jcat.1999.2603 ↗
28. Dall Acqua · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 2 · 499110.1039/b005007p ↗
29. Zhang · Res. Chem. Intermed. · 2015 · 41 · 347910.1007/s11164-013-1465-9 ↗
30. Topsoe · J. Catal. · 1995 · 151 · 24110.1006/jcat.1995.1025 ↗
31. Topsoe · J. Catal. · 1995 · 151 · 22610.1006/jcat.1995.1024 ↗
32. Li · J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. · 2014 · 386 · 6910.1016/j.molcata.2014.02.016 ↗
33. Chen · J. Rare Earth · 2014 · 32 · 90710.1016/S1002-0721(14)60162-9 ↗