Ag/AgBr/g-C3N4: A highly efficient and stable composite photocatalyst for degradation of organic contaminants under visible light
Source abstract
Abstract
Graphical abstract: Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} composite photocatalysts displayed excellent photocatalytic activities on the degradation of methyl orange (MO) under visible light. The improved photocatalytic performance and stability of Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} originated from the synergetic effects of AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} interface and metallic Ag nanoparticles. ·O{sub 2}−, one of the reactive species, was responsible for the photodegradation of MO compared to H+ and ·OH. - Highlights: • Novel Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} composite photocatalyst was reported. • Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} had novel energy band combination between AgBr and g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4}. • Synergetic effects of AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} interface and metallic Ag nanoparticles. • Electron trapping role of metallic Ag dominated the stability of Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4}. - Abstract: Novel Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} composite photocatalysts were constructed via deposition–precipitation method and extensively characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). Under visible light (λ > 420 nm), Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} composite photocatalysts displayed much higher photocatalytic activities than those of Ag/AgBr and g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} for degradation of methyl orange (MO). 50% Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} presented the best photocatalytic performance, which was mainly attributed to the synergistic effects ofmore » AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} interface and the in situ metallic Ag nanoparticles for efficiently separating electron–hole pairs. Furthermore, Ag/AgBr/g-C{sub 3}N{sub 4} remained good photocatalytic activity through 5 times of cycle experiments. Additionally, the radical scavengers experiment indicated that ·O{sub 2}{sup −} was the main reactive species for the MO degradation under visible light.« less
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Fujishima · Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
2. Fox · Chem. Rev. · 1993 · 93 · 34110.1021/cr00017a016 ↗
3. Hoffmann · Chem. Rev. · 1995 · 95 · 6910.1021/cr00033a004 ↗
4. Rajeshwar · Chem. Mater. · 2001 · 13 · 276510.1021/cm010254z ↗
5. Zou · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 62510.1038/414625a ↗
6. Linsebigler · Chem. Rev. · 1995 · 95 · 73510.1021/cr00035a013 ↗
7. Torimoto · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 1996 · 30 · 127510.1021/es950483k ↗
8. Almquist · J. Catal. · 2002 · 212 · 14510.1006/jcat.2002.3783 ↗
9. Zang · Appl. Catal. B: Environ. · 2008 · 79 · 33410.1016/j.apcatb.2007.10.019 ↗
10. Thomas · J. Mater. Chem. · 2008 · 18 · 489310.1039/b800274f ↗
11. Wang · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 7610.1038/nmat2317 ↗
12. Dong · J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 1517110.1039/c1jm12844b ↗
13. Yan · Dalton Trans. · 2010 · 39 · 148810.1039/B914110C ↗
14. Yan · J. Alloys Comp. · 2011 · 509 · L2610.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.201 ↗
15. Ge · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 1184310.1039/c2jm16241e ↗
16. Singh · ACS Catal. · 2012 · 2 · 113810.1021/cs3001094 ↗
17. Min · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1393810.1021/jp203750z ↗
18. Wang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 236210.1021/ja109856y ↗
19. Ge · Appl. Catal. A: Gen. · 2011 · 409–410 · 21510.1016/j.apcata.2011.10.006 ↗
20. Xu · Appl. Catal. B: Environ. · 2013 · 129 · 18210.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.015 ↗
21. Lan · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2013 · 395 · 7510.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.033 ↗
22. Cao · J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. · 2011 · 344 · 13810.1016/j.molcata.2011.05.012 ↗
23. Cheng · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 705410.1039/c1cc11525a ↗
24. Asi · Catal. Today · 2011 · 175 · 25610.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.055 ↗
25. Wang · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 793110.1002/anie.200802483 ↗
26. Wang · Chem. Eur. J. · 2009 · 15 · 182110.1002/chem.200802327 ↗
27. Yu · Dalton Trans. · 2012 · 41 · 1040510.1039/c2dt30864a ↗
28. Zhang · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 654310.1021/cm801796q ↗
29. Kuai · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1872310.1021/la104022g ↗
30. Wang · Chem. Eur. J. · 2010 · 16 · 1004210.1002/chem.200903361 ↗
31. Wang · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 981310.1039/c2cp40823f ↗
32. Zeng · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1187910.1021/jp0684628 ↗
33. Wang · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 27510.1039/C1CC16423F ↗
34. Li · Chemosphere · 2009 · 76 · 118510.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.027 ↗
35. Zhang · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 44 · 139210.1021/es903087w ↗
36. Yin · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 836110.1021/es902011h ↗
37. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 913610.1021/jp2009989 ↗
38. Ishibashi · Electrochem. Commun. · 2000 · 2 · 20710.1016/S1388-2481(00)00006-0 ↗
39. Xiao · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2008 · 150 · 6210.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.045 ↗
40. Zhu · J. Alloys Comp. · 2011 · 509 · 947910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.07.046 ↗
41. Ge · J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. · 2006 · 258 · 6810.1016/j.molcata.2006.05.026 ↗
42. Gu · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2009 · 9 · 327810.1021/cg900043k ↗
43. Lu · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1679210.1021/jp803654k ↗
44. Xiong · Catal. Commun. · 2011 · 16 · 22910.1016/j.catcom.2011.09.027 ↗
45. Yang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2010 · 162 · 17110.1016/j.cej.2010.05.024 ↗
46. Li · J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. · 2011 · 334 · 11610.1016/j.molcata.2010.11.005 ↗