Fabrication of MoS2/CdS/TiO2 composites for photoreduction of U(VI) under visible light
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. I.G. Alhindawy et al., Cobalt doped titania-carbon nanosheets with induced oxygen vacancies for photocatalytic degradation of uranium complexes in radioactive wastes. 2022. 4: p. 5330–5342.10.1039/D2NA00467D ↗
2. A.A. Alqadami et al., Novel metal-organic framework (MOF) based composite material for the sequestration of U(VI) and Th(IV) metal ions from aqueous environment. 2017. 9: p. 36026–36037.10.1021/acsami.7b10768 ↗
3. A.R. Bagheri et al., Covalent organic frameworks as robust materials for mitigation of environmental pollutants. 2021. 270: p. 777–783.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129523 ↗
4. Y. Cai et al., Highly efficient uranium extraction by a piezo catalytic reduction-oxidation process. 2022. 310: p. 987–991.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121343 ↗
5. H. Chen et al., Enhanced enhanced adsorption of U(VI) and Am-241(III) from wastewater using Ca/Al layered double hydroxide@carbon nanotube composites. 2018. 347: p. 67–77.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.12.062 ↗
6. Z.M. Dong et al., Harvesting the vibration energy of CdS for high-efficient piezo-photocatalysis removal of U(VI): roles of shape dependent and piezoelectric polarization. 2024. p. DOI: 10.1002/eem1002.12705.10.1002/eem2.12705 ↗
7. Q. Wang et al., Construction of Bi-assisted modified CdS/TiO2 nanotube arrays with ternary S-scheme heterojunction for photocatalytic wastewater treatment and hydrogen production. 2022. 322: p. 124163.10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124163 ↗
8. C. Freysoldt et al., First-principles calculations for point defects in solids. 2014. 86: p. 651–662.10.1103/RevModPhys.86.253 ↗
9. Z. Li et al., Solar light-responsive CdS/UiO-66-NH2 for ultrafast uranium reduction from uranium-containing mine wastewater without external sacrificial agents. 2022. 283: p. 976–982.10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120195 ↗
10. X. Lian et al., MoS2-CdS heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic activity: a first principles study. 2018. 120: p. 52–56.10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.04.020 ↗
11. C. Yu et al., Fabrication of heterostructured CdS/TiO2 nanotube arrays composites for photoreduction of U(VI) under visible light. 2021. 298: p. 991.10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122053 ↗
12. C. Liu et al., Facile formation of Mo-vacancy defective MoS2/CdS nanoparticles enhanced efficient hydrogen production. 2022. 643: p. 888–891.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128743 ↗
13. Y. Guo et al., Adsorption and photocatalytic reduction activity of uranium(VI) on zinc oxide/rectorite composite enhanced with methanol as sacrificial organics. 2016. 310: p. 883–890.10.1007/s10967-016-4820-7 ↗
14. P. Li et al., An overview and recent progress in the heterogeneous photocatalytic reduction of U(VI). 2019. 41: p. 87–93.10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2019.100320 ↗
15. Z. Li et al., Uranium(VI) adsorption on graphene oxide nanosheets from aqueous solutions. 2012. 210: p. 539–546.10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.030 ↗
16. Z. Dong et al., Novel Co3O4@TiO2@CdS@Au double-shelled nanocage for high-efficient photocatalysis removal of U(VI): roles of spatial charges separation and photothermal effect. 2023. 452: p. 131248.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131248 ↗
17. Y. Zhang et al., Ultra-fast uranium capture via the synergistic interaction of the intrinsic sulfur atoms and the phosphoric acid groups adhered to edge sulfur of MoS2. 2023. 457: p. 131745.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131745 ↗
18. B. Chai et al., Remarkably enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over MoS2 nanosheets loaded on uniform CdS nanospheres. 2018. 430: p. 523–530.10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.292 ↗
19. G. Chen et al., Ball-milling combined calcination synthesis of MoS2/CdS photocatalysts for high photocatalytic H2 evolution activity under visible light irradiation. 2012. 443: p. 138–144.10.1016/j.apcata.2012.07.033 ↗
20. J. Xu, X. Cao, Characterization and mechanism of MoS2/CdS composite photocatalyst used for hydrogen production from water splitting under visible light. 2015. 260: p. 642–648.10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.046 ↗
21. X.-H. Zhang et al., Defect-rich O-incorporated 1T-MoS2 nanosheets for remarkably enhanced visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution over CdS: the impact of enriched defects. 2018. 229: p. 227–236.10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.025 ↗
22. X. Zong et al., Photocatalytic H2 evolution on MoS2/CdS catalysts under visible light irradiation. 2010. 114: p. 1963–1968.10.1021/jp904350e ↗
23. P.-l. Liang et al., Photocatalytic reduction of uranium(VI) by magnetic ZnFe2O4 under visible light. 2020. 267: p. 985–990.10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118688 ↗
24. F. Liu et al., Insight into the performance and mechanism of persimmon tannin functionalized waste paper for U(VI) and Cr(VI) removal. 2022. 287: p. 534–540.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132199 ↗
25. P. Liang et al., Photocatalytic reduction of uranium(VI) under visible light with 2D/1D Ti3C2/CdS. 2021. 420: p. 1350–1365.10.1016/j.cej.2021.129831 ↗
26. J. Liu et al., Sensitive electrochemiluminescence aptasensor for chlorpyrifos detection based on resonance energy transfer between MoS2/CdS nanospheres and Ag/CQDs. 2020. 315: p. 1976–1982.10.1016/j.snb.2020.128098 ↗
27. Y. Liu et al., Impact of metal ions and organic ligands on uranium removal properties by zeolitic imidazolate framework materials. 2021. 278: p. 18790–18799.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123216 ↗
28. L. Newsome et al., The biogeochemistry and bioremediation of uranium and other priority radionuclides. 2014. 363: p. 164–184.10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.034 ↗
29. B. Pant et al., MoS2/CdS/TiO2 ternary composite incorporated into carbon nanofibers for the removal of organic pollutants from water. 2019. 102: p. 113–119.10.1016/j.inoche.2019.02.022 ↗
30. N. Qin et al., Highly efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution over MoS2/CdS-TiO2 nanofibers prepared by an electrospinning mediated photodeposition method. 2017. 202: p. 374–380.10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.040 ↗
31. T.A. Saleh et al., Polyethylenimine modified activated carbon as novel magnetic adsorbent for the removal of uranium from aqueous solution. 2017. 117: p. 218–227.10.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.030 ↗
32. S. Pu et al., Design, synthesis and photodegradation ammonia properties of MoS2@TiO2 encapsulated carbon coaxial nanobelts. 2017. 209: p. 56–59.10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.094 ↗
33. M. Sun et al., Construction of MoS2/CdS/TiO2 ternary composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability. 2016. 684: p. 335–341.10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.189 ↗
34. L. Wang et al., Efficient U(VI) reduction and sequestration by Ti2CTx MXene. 2018. 52: p. 10748–10756.10.1021/acs.est.8b03711 ↗
35. Z. Wang et al., Three-dimensional MoS2-CdS-gamma-TaON hollow composites for enhanced visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution. 2014. 50: p. 1731–1734.10.1039/C3CC48752K ↗
36. R.-H. Xu et al., Vinylene-linked covalent organic frameworks with enhanced uranium adsorption through three synergistic mechanisms. 2021. 419: p. 2980–2994.10.1016/j.cej.2021.129550 ↗
37. H. Yang et al., Functionalized iron-nitrogen-carbon electrocatalyst provides a reversible electron transfer platform for efficient uranium extraction from seawater. 2021. 33: p. 89–102.10.1002/adma.202106621 ↗
38. A. Fujishima et al., TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. 2008. 63: p. 515–582.10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001 ↗
39. T. Kecskes et al., FTIR and mass spectrometric study of HCOOH interaction with TiO2 supported Rh and Au catalysts. 2004. 268: p. 9–16.10.1016/j.apcata.2004.03.021 ↗
40. M. Krunks et al., Thermoanalytical study of acetylacetonate-modified titanium(IV) isopropoxide as a precursor for TiO2 films. 2005. 80: p. 483–488.10.1007/s10973-005-0681-y ↗
41. S. Yang et al., Synergistic removal and reduction of U(VI) and Cr(VI) by Fe3S4 micro-crystal. 2020. 385: p. 3337–3342.10.1016/j.cej.2019.123909 ↗
42. F. Yu et al., Tunable perylene-based donor-acceptor conjugated microporous polymer to significantly enhance photocatalytic uranium extraction from seawater. 2021. 412: p. 2956–2961.10.1016/j.cej.2020.127558 ↗
43. K. Yu et al., Semiconducting metal-organic frameworks decorated with spatially separated dual cocatalysts for efficient uranium(VI) photoreduction. 2022. 32: p. 971–985.10.1002/adfm.202200315 ↗
44. J.-R. Zhang et al., Density functional theory calculation on facet-dependent photocatalytic activity of MoS2/CdS heterostructures. 2019. 469: p. 27–33.10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.004 ↗
45. Y. Zhang et al., Highly efficient removal of U(VI) by the photoreduction of SnO2/CdCO3/CdS nanocomposite under visible light irradiation. 2020. 279: p. 997–1008.10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119390 ↗
46. Y. Yuan et al., Photoinduced multiple effects to enhance uranium extraction from natural seawater by black phosphorus nanosheets. 2020. 59: p. 1220–1227.10.1002/anie.201913644 ↗
47. Y. Sun et al., Boosting photocatalytic efficiency of MoS2/CdS by modulating morphology. 2022. 29: p. 73282–73291.10.1007/s11356-022-20550-1 ↗
48. H. Zhang et al., Three mechanisms in one material: uranium capture by a polyoxo-metalate-organic framework through combined complexation, chemical reduction, and photocatalytic reduction. 2019. 58: p. 16110–16114.10.1002/anie.201909718 ↗
49. Q. Wang et al., Construction of Z-scheme Bi2O3/CeO2 heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic capacity of TiO2 NTs. 2024. 304: p. 123405.10.1016/j.saa.2023.123405 ↗
50. T. Zhang et al., Preparation of a novel Fe2O3-MoS2-CdS ternary composite film and its photoelectrocatalytic performance. 2018. 285: p. 230–240.10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.217 ↗
51. Y. Zhao et al., Synthesis of amidoxime-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2 core-shell magnetic microspheres for highly efficient sorption of U(VI). 2014. 235: p. 275–283.10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.034 ↗
52. L. Bao et al., High efficient photoreduction of U(VI) by a new synergistic photocatalyst of Fe3O4 nanoparticle on GO/g-C3N4 composites. 2022. 18: p. 4248–4255.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.102 ↗
53. X. Cao et al., Efficient strategy for U(VI) photoreduction: simultaneous construction of U(VI) confinement sites and water oxidation sites. 2022. 45: p. 456–461.
54. D. Chen et al., Visible-light-driven sonophotocatalysis for the rapid reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) Based on zirconium-porphyrin metal-organic frameworks with csq topology. 2021. 60: p. 18133–18140.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02739 ↗
55. M. Chen et al., Mixed-linker strategy toward enhanced photoreduction-assisted uranium recovery from wastewater and seawater. 2022. 446: p. 1989–1995.10.1016/j.cej.2022.137264 ↗
56. T. Chen et al., MXene-derived 3D defect-rich TiO2@reduced graphene oxide aerogel with ultrafast carrier separation for photo-assisted uranium extraction: a combined batch, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations. 2022. 61: p. 12759–12771.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01850 ↗
57. K. Chen et al., Interaction mechanism between different facet TiO2 and U(VI): experimental and density-functional theory investigation. 2019. 359: p. 944–954.10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.092 ↗
58. L. Chen et al., Efficient photoreduction removal of uranium(VI) by O, K co-doped g-C3N4 under air atmosphere without sacrificial agents. 2023. 307: p. 77–82.10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122873 ↗
59. T. Chen et al., Harmonizing the energy band between adsorbent and semiconductor enables efficient uranium extraction. 2021. 420: p. 87–98.10.1016/j.cej.2020.127645 ↗
60. T. Chen et al., Efficient uranium reduction of bacterial cellulose-MoS2 heterojunction via the synergistically effect of Schottky junction and S-vacancies engineering. 2021. 406: p. 156–181.10.1016/j.cej.2020.126791 ↗
61. T. Chen et al., Ternary boron carbon nitrides hollow nanotubes with tunable p-n homojunction for photo-assisted uranium extraction: a combined batch, EXAFS and DFT calculations. 2022. 318: p. 100–110.10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121815 ↗
62. T. Chen et al., Advanced photocatalysts for uranium extraction: elaborate design and future perspectives. 2022. 467: p. 214615.10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214615 ↗
63. C. Constantin et al., U(VI) removal from diluted aqueous systems by sorption-flotation. 2022. 12: p. 56–61.10.1038/s41598-022-19002-0 ↗
64. Z. Dong et al., Double-shelled hollow nanosphere assembled by TiO2@surface sulfate functionalized CdS for boosting photocatalysis reduction of U(VI) under seawater conditions. 2022. 431: p. 133256–133264.10.1016/j.cej.2021.133256 ↗
65. Z. Dong et al., Ingenious design of ternary hollow nanosphere with shell hierarchical tandem heterojunctions toward optimized Visible-light photocatalytic reduction of U(VI). 2022. 286: p. 76–83.10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120418 ↗
66. S. Koppula et al., Mesoporous MOF composite for efficient removal of uranium, methyl orange, methylene blue, and Congo red dyes from aqueous solutions. 2022. 36: p. 789–794.10.1002/aoc.6554 ↗
67. J. Wang et al., Visible light driven Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 for adsorption-photocatalysis of aqueous U(VI). 2020. 262: p. 114373.10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114373 ↗
68. Y. Xu et al., Surface hybridization of π-conjugate structure cyclized polyacrylonitrile and radial microsphere shaped TiO2 for reducing U(VI) to U(IV). 2021. 416: p. 125812.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125812 ↗
69. Z. Li et al., Solar light-responsive CdS/UiO-66-NH2 for ultrafast uranium reduction from uranium-containing mine wastewater without external sacrificial agents. 2022. 283: p. 120195.10.1016/j.seppur.2021.120195 ↗
70. T. He et al., The photocatalytic extraction of U(VI) by CdS/g-C3N4 cellulose film. 2024. 395: p. 123851.10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123851 ↗
71. F. Wang et al., Coupling of CdS and g-C3N4 decorated dendritic fibrous nano-silica for efficient photocatalytic reduction of uranium (VI). 2022. 299: p. 121707.10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121707 ↗
72. L. Li et al., Functionalization of carbon nanomaterials by means of phytic acid for uranium enrichment. 2019. 694: p. 640–652.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133697 ↗
73. S. Li et al., Efficient photoreduction strategy for uranium immobilization based on graphite carbon nitride/activated carbon nanocomposites. 2022. 33: p. 3581–3584.10.1016/j.cclet.2022.03.043 ↗
74. S. Li et al., Modifying g-C3N4 with oxidized Ti3C2 MXene for boosting photocatalytic U(VI) reduction performance. 2022. 346: p. 664–651.10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117937 ↗
75. H. Liu et al., In-situ oxidized tungsten disulfide nanosheets achieve ultrafast photocatalytic extraction of uranium through hydroxyl-mediated binding and reduction. 2022. 15: p. 8810–8818.10.1007/s12274-022-4559-0 ↗
76. Z. Li et al., Synthesis of MoS2/P-g-C3N4 nanocomposites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for the removal of uranium (VI). 2021. 302: p. 389–401.10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122305 ↗
77. Y. Liu et al., Construction of g-C3N4/Ag/TiO2 Z-scheme photocatalyst and Its improved photocatalytic U (VI) reduction application in aqueous. 2022. 85: p. 2639–2651.10.2166/wst.2022.139 ↗
78. G. Rao et al., Fabrication of MoS2@TiO2 hollow-sphere heterostructures with enhanced visible light photocatalytic reduction of U(VI). 2022. 331: p. 263–273.10.1007/s10967-021-08091-2 ↗
79. R. Yang et al., Preparation and characterization of in-site regenerated TiO2-ACFs photocatalyst. 2011. 18: p. 357–363.10.1007/s12613-011-0447-4 ↗
80. X. Zhong et al., Adsorption-photocatalysis processes: the performance and mechanism of a bifunctional covalent organic framework for removing uranium ions from water. 2022. 597: p. 654–663.10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153621 ↗
81. S. Fan et al., Biochar prepared from co-pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge and tea waste for the adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions: kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic and mechanism. 2016. 220: p. 432–441.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.107 ↗
82. J. Du et al., Highly efficient hydrogen evolution catalysis based on MoS2/CdS/TiO2 porous composites. 2018. 43: p. 9307–9315.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.208 ↗
83. W.-R. Cui et al., Rational design of covalent organic frameworks as a groundbreaking uranium capture platform through three synergistic mechanisms. 2021. 294: p. 951–967.10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120250 ↗
84. Z. Dong et al., Biomimetic photocatalytic system designed by spatially separated cocatalysts on Z-scheme heterojunction with identified charge-transfer processes for boosting removal of U(VI). 2023. 19: p. 77–85.10.1002/smll.202300003 ↗