journal article·2026-06Open access

An advanced hybrid LaserFIB/PFIB approach for single-crystal copper micro-tensile specimen fabrication

Betty Huang, Bita Pourbahari, Pierre-Antony Deschênes, Laurent Tôn-Thât, Travis Casagrande, Mehdi Mosayebi, Concetta Pelligra, Daniel Paquet, Nabil Bassim

Materials Letters· Volume 413

Abstract

The mechanical size effect of samples produced by PFIB and LaserFIB machining was determined by analyzing micro-tensile specimens of ⟨001⟩-oriented single-crystal copper. The LaserFIB attachment offers a significant advantage by dramatically increasing material removal rates for meso- and microscale specimens compared to PFIB milling, making the specimen preparation workflow 2 to 3 times faster than using the PFIB alone, a time advantage that becomes even more pronounced as the number of samples increases. Incorporating PFIB trimming after laser ablation further enhances shape accuracy. Overall, this combined methodology proved to be an optimal route for the efficient and accurate production of micro-tensile specimens. In addition, copper tensile specimens exhibiting multi-slip deformation through the activation of multiple crystallographic slip systems along different planar directions, while localized single-slip behavior was also observed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Deschênes · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 85810.1016/j.msea.2022.144030 ↗
2. Khoshnoud · IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine · 2012 · 15 · 1410.1109/MIM.2012.6174574 ↗
3. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
4. Kheradmand · J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2010 · 24010.1088/1742-6596/240/1/012017 ↗
5. Li · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5
6. Kiener · Crystals · 2021 · 1110.3390/cryst11010061 ↗
7. Lee · Met. Mater. Int. · 2011 · 17 · 25110.1007/s12540-011-0411-x ↗
8. Frick · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2008 · 489 · 31910.1016/j.msea.2007.12.038 ↗
9. Espinosa · 2001
10. Wang · J. Mater. Res. · 2021 · 36 · 216610.1557/s43578-021-00221-6 ↗
11. Zong · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2006 · 434 · 17810.1016/j.msea.2006.06.137 ↗
12. Kihara · Mater. Lett. · 2015 · 153 · 3610.1016/j.matlet.2015.03.119 ↗
13. Orloff · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1975 · 12 · 120910.1116/1.568497 ↗
14. Unocic · J. Microsc. · 2010 · 240 · 22710.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03401.x ↗
15. Smith · Exp. Mech. · 2019 · 59 · 111310.1007/s11340-019-00528-w ↗
16. Wheeler · Exp. Mech. · 2015 · 55 · 137510.1007/s11340-015-0020-6 ↗
17. Gianola · Curr. Opinion Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2023 · 2710.1016/j.cossms.2023.101090 ↗
18. Zhang · Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2026 · 2710.1080/14686996.2026.2627678 ↗
19. Wan · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2025 · 94210.1016/j.msea.2025.148699 ↗
20. Li · Scr. Mater. · 2026 · 277
21. Tordoff · Appl. Microscopy · 2020 · 50 · 2410.1186/s42649-020-00044-5 ↗
22. Tkadletz · Ultramicroscopy · 2023 · 24610.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113672 ↗
23. Garner · Mater. Charact. · 2022 · 18810.1016/j.matchar.2022.111890 ↗
24. Pfeifenberger · Mater. Des. · 2017 · 121 · 10910.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.012 ↗
25. White · Ultramicroscopy · 2021 · 22010.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113161 ↗
26. Gigax · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 170 · 14510.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.05.004 ↗
27. Harvey · JOM · 2021 · 73 · 424010.1007/s11837-021-04964-9 ↗
28. Bao · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 85510.1016/j.msea.2022.143834 ↗
29. 2026
30. Takeuchi · Trans. Jpn. Inst. Metals · 1975 · 16 · 62910.2320/matertrans1960.16.629 ↗