journal article·2018-08-01

Parallelized microfluidic diatom accumulation assay to test fouling-release coatings

Kim Alexander Nolte, Jana Schwarze, Cindy Denise Beyer, Onur Özcan, Axel Rosenhahn

Biointerphases· Volume 13· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Assessing the efficiency of the next generation of protective marine coatings is highly relevant for their optimization. In this paper, a parallelized microfluidic testing device is presented to quantify the accumulation of a model organism (Navicula perminuta) under constant laminar flow. Using automated microscopy in conjunction with image analysis, the adhesion densities on the tested surfaces could be determined after exposure to a flow of suspended algae for 90 min. The optimized protocol for the assay is presented, and the reproducibility of the densities of attached diatoms was verified on four identical surfaces (self-assembled dodecanethiol monolayers). A set of well-characterized self-assembled monolayers with different chemical terminations was used to validate the performance of the assay and its capability to discriminate diatom accumulation on different surface chemistries under dynamic conditions. The observed trends are in good agreement with previously published results obtained in single channel accumulation and detachment assays. To demonstrate the practical relevance of the dynamic experiment, diatom attachment on four technically relevant silicone coatings with different fouling-release properties could clearly be distinguished.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Analytical Chemistry—Biointerfaces, Ruhr-University Bochum , Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany

Funding

Mercator Research Center Ruhr · Office of Naval Research

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Biofouling · 2003 · 19 · 910.1080/0892701031000088535 ↗
2. Biofouling · 2015 · 31 · 75910.1080/08927014.2015.1108407 ↗
3. Biofouling · 2007 · 23 · 33110.1080/08927010701461974 ↗
4. Prog. Org. Coat · 2001 · 43 · 18810.1016/S0300-9440(01)00180-1 ↗
5. Proc. Inst. Mar. Eng. Sci. Technol. B · 2003 · 2003 · 11
6. Biofouling · 2014 · 30 · 104510.1080/08927014.2014.967687 ↗
7. Biointerphases · 2013 · 8 · 510.1186/1559-4106-8-5 ↗
8. Langmuir · 2016 · 32 · 566310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00839 ↗
9. Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 33510.1002/adma.200701164 ↗
10. Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 818610.1021/la061012m ↗
11. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 92010.1002/adma.200901407 ↗
12. Biofouling · 2003 · 19 · 9110.1080/0892701021000053381 ↗
13. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. · 2004 · 42 · 619310.1002/pola.20466 ↗
14. Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 507510.1021/la052978l ↗
15. Biofouling · 2010 · 26 · 23510.1080/08927010903469676 ↗
16. Biofouling · 2009 · 25 · 2110.1080/08927010802431298 ↗
17. Bioinspir. Biomim. · 2011 · 6 · 4600110.1088/1748-3182/6/4/046001 ↗
18. Biofouling · 2010 · 26 · 71910.1080/08927014.2010.511198 ↗
19. Biofouling · 2011 · 27 · 7310.1080/08927014.2010.536837 ↗
20. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 58110.1039/C2CP43586A ↗
21. Nature · 2011 · 477 · 44310.1038/nature10447 ↗
22. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 1007410.1021/am402635p ↗
23. Biophys. J. · 2004 · 87 · 428410.1529/biophysj.104.043307 ↗
24. Biophys. J. · 2006 · 90 · 298710.1529/biophysj.105.079129 ↗
25. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2000 · 66 · 324910.1128/AEM.66.8.3249-3254.2000 ↗
26. Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 50310.1021/la702275g ↗
27. Biointerphases · 2012 · 7 · 3310.1007/s13758-012-0033-y ↗
28. Biofouling · 2000 · 15 · 24310.1080/08927010009386315 ↗
29. Anal. Chem. · 2004 · 76 · 525710.1021/ac049837t ↗
30. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 449810.1039/b924304f ↗
31. Biointerphases · 2012 · 7 · 2610.1007/s13758-012-0026-x ↗
32. Biofouling · 2015 · 31 · 46910.1080/08927014.2015.1061655 ↗
33. Biofouling · 2014 · 30 · 11510.1080/08927014.2013.847927 ↗
34. J. Microbiol. Methods · 1994 · 20 · 28910.1016/0167-7012(94)90053-1 ↗
35. J. Microbiol. Methods · 1995 · 23 · 16910.1016/0167-7012(95)00013-B ↗
36. Biofouling · 2017 · 33 · 53110.1080/08927014.2017.1328058 ↗
37. J. Fluids Eng. · 2007 · 129 · 128110.1115/1.2776969 ↗
38. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2003 · 69 · 628010.1128/AEM.69.10.6280-6287.2003 ↗
39. Biofouling · 2011 · 27 · 95510.1080/08927014.2011.618268 ↗
40. Biofouling · 2014 · 30 · 113310.1080/08927014.2014.974576 ↗
41. J. Appl. Phycol. · 2016 · 28 · 26910.1007/s10811-015-0584-7 ↗
42. J. Phycol. · 1998 · 34 · 910.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340009.x ↗
43. Biofouling · 2004 · 20 · 32310.1080/08927010400029031 ↗
44. Biointerphases · 2007 · 2 · 14310.1116/1.2806729 ↗
45. Biofouling · 2014 · 30 · 101110.1080/08927014.2014.957195 ↗
46. Biofouling · 2015 · 31 · 22910.1080/08927014.2015.1022534 ↗
47. Biofouling · 2007 · 23 · 1510.1080/08927010601093026 ↗
48. Langmuir · 2015 · 40 · 1110510.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02321 ↗
49. Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 403910.1021/la3038022 ↗
50. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 427510.1039/c001968m ↗
51. Integr. Comp. Biol. · 2002 · 42 · 111610.1093/icb/42.6.1116 ↗
52. J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2014 · 24 · 3501710.1088/0960-1317/24/3/035017 ↗
53. J. Biomech. · 2005 · 38 · 122110.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.06.008 ↗
54. Biofouling · 2000 · 15 · 7310.1080/08927010009386299 ↗
55. Prog. Org. Coat. · 1999 · 35 · 3110.1016/S0300-9440(99)00005-3 ↗
56. Biofouling · 2003 · 19 · 1710.1080/0892701031000089516 ↗
57. See supplementary material at https://doi.org/10.1116/1.5034090 for the result of a dynamic attachment experiment using a batch of diatoms with weaker overall attachment competence (Fig. S1). We used the same diatom suspension concentration, but only 45 cells/mm2 attached to DDT as compared to ≈100–200 cells/mm2 in the experiments discussed in the results part. Although the trends between the chemistries are still in line with the above results, the relative differences deviate. HUDT shows 48.6% of the adhesion density of DDT, EG6OH has 29.5% of the coverage of DDT and the coverage on PEG is 9.6% of that on DDT. While PEG coatings accumulated a similar algae density on the surface (4 ± 1 mm−2) as in the other examples above, the low numbers on the hydrophobic surfaces such as DDT shift the relative.