journal article·2019-09

Perchloric acid functionalized nano-silica and protic ionic liquid based non-aqueous proton conductive polymer electrolytes

Manjula G. Nair, Saumya R. Mohapatra

Materials Letters· Volume 251
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Both protic ionic liquids (PILs) and superacids are known to be rich sources of protons and their good carrier as well. Herein, we report a novel approach in developing non-aqueous proton conductive nanocomposite electrolytes (PCNEs) by making composite of a PIL; diethylmethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate ([dema][TfO]) and a superacid; perchloric acid (HClO4). Initially, HClO4 was immobilized on nano-silica powders; and then both ([dema][TfO]) and HClO4·SiO2 were incorporated into poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) matrix. X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy suggest decrease in overall crystallinity of the composite membranes on addition of [dema][TfO]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show that microstructures such as spherulite structures and micropores on the membrane surface evolves with [dema][TfO] concentration. At 80 wt% of [dema][TfO], the density of pores appears on the membrane surface is maximum. The dc ionic conductivity is also observed to be increasing with [dema][TfO] concentration. The maximum conductivity of 0.02 mS cm−1 and 0.6 m Scm−1 are achieved at room temperature (30 °C) and 100 °C, respectively for 80 wt% of [dema][TfO]. This ionic conductivity variation is well correlated with the increase in pore density and decreasing crystallinity of the PCNE film.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Ionic liquids properties and applications · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Lee · J. Power Sour. · 2010 · 195 · 590910.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.045 ↗
2. Ye · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2015 · 137 · 91310.1021/ja511389q ↗
3. Gao · RSC Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 3309110.1039/C4RA05151C ↗
4. Krishnan · J. Memb. Sci. · 2017 · 544 · 41610.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.049 ↗
5. Bano · Electrochim. Acta · 2019 · 293 · 26010.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.029 ↗
6. Chandra · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 657010.1021/ja502212v ↗
7. Díaz · Electrochim. Acta · 2017 · 247 · 97010.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.076 ↗
8. Liu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 319510.1021/am404645c ↗
9. Kim · Nat. Commun. · 2010 · 1 · 8810.1038/ncomms1086 ↗
10. Fernicola · J. Power Sour. · 2008 · 178 · 59110.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.079 ↗
11. Fujisawa · ECS Trans. · 2013 · 50 · 108910.1149/05002.1089ecst ↗
12. Lee · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 976410.1021/ja102367x ↗
13. Khan · Eur. J. Org. Chem. · 2006 · 222610.1002/ejoc.200600006 ↗
14. Tomer · J. Appl. Phy. · 2011 · 11010.1063/1.3609082 ↗
15. GSaiz · Mater. Des. · 2018 · 155 · 32510.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.013 ↗
16. Cai · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 1538210.1039/C7RA01267E ↗
17. Mori · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 2010 · 83 · 32810.1246/bcsj.20090209 ↗