journal article·2020-09

Composite dip coating improves biocompatibility of porous metallic scaffolds

Joseph Deering, Amanda Clifford, Andrew D'Elia, Igor Zhitomirsky, Kathryn Grandfield

Materials Letters· Volume 274
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Porous materials are becoming more common for bone implants, and it is increasingly important to find surface modification strategies that affect both the implant exterior and porous interior. In this study, selective laser melting (SLM) was used to create porous stainless steel implants 8 mm in diameter, which were subsequently dip coated with a composite polymethylmethacrylate-alumina (PMMA-Al2O3) film. Imaging with electron microscopy found evidence of the films at a depth of 2.2 mm into the porous implants, with dual-scale topography created by the native SLM stainless steel substrate and alumina nanoparticles. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the presence of the coating along the periphery of interior pores. In vitro tests with osteoblast-like cells showed greater cell metabolism on composite-coated samples compared to uncoated dense samples after seven days of culture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress-shielding following total hip arthroplasty10.1002/jor.23445 ↗
2. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
3. Additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials10.1039/C9TB00420C ↗
4. Calcium phosphate bioceramics: a review of their history, structure, properties, coating technologies and biomedical applications10.3390/ma10040334 ↗
5. Zhitomirsky I. Biomimetic modification of poly-l-lysine and electrodeposition of nanocomposite coatings for orthopaedic applications
6. Evaluation of cytocompatibility and bending modulus of nanoceramic/polymer composites10.1002/jbm.a.30204 ↗
7. The contributions and limitations of hydroxyapatite coatings to implant fixation10.1007/PL00006691 ↗
8. Tailored surface treatment of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V by microarc oxidation for enhanced osseointegration via optimized bone in-growth patterns and interlocked bone/implant interface10.1021/acsami.6b05893 ↗
9. Effect of polarization voltage on the surface componentization and biocompatibility of micro-arc oxidation modified selective laser melted Ti6Al4V10.1088/2053-1591/ab1abc ↗
10. Additive manufacturing of low-cost porous titanium-based composites for biomedical applications: advantages, challenges and opinion for future development10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154263 ↗
11. Sol-gel deposition of hydroxyapatite coatings on porous titanium for biomedical applications10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.10.079 ↗
12. Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite–alginate on rapid prototyped 3D Ti6Al4V scaffolds10.1007/s10853-015-9543-6 ↗
13. Biocompatible alumina ceramic for total hip replacements10.1179/174328408X287682 ↗
14. Electrophoretic deposition of polymethylmethacrylate and composites for biomedical applications
15. The role of well-defined nanotopography of titanium implants on osseointegration: cellular and molecular events in vivo10.2147/IJN.S101294 ↗