journal article·2017-12-01

Constitutive behaviour of paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) cartilage

Jeremiah F Deang, Paul G Allison, Raj Prabhu, Lakiesha N Williams, Hongjoo Rhee, Wilburn R Whittington, Edward J Perkins, Stephen M Bruce, Mark F Horstemeyer

Publisher page

Abstract

This study explored the constitutive behaviour of the midline cartilage of the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) rostrum and examined the properties of the cartilage as a function of stress state and strain rate. The cartilage structure of the paddlefish contributes to the physical characteristics of the unique rostrum, and is of much interest as an inspiration for engineered structures. Low-strain rate testing (∼0·01/s) results indicated an average compressive yield stress of 11·34 ± 3·10 MPa and an average tensile yield stress of 3·62 ± 0·62 MPa. High-strain rate testing (∼100/s) results showed an average compressive yield stress of 25·07 ± 10·86 MPa. A histological study showed that the material is a type of hyaline cartilage. An Ogden hyperelastic model was used for finite-element analysis and fit very well with experimental data. This paper contributes to an overall study examining the electrosensory capabilities, hydrodynamics and structure–property relationships of the rostrum.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA

US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS, USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11837-006-0138-110.1007/s11837-006-0138-1 ↗
2. 10.1098/rsif.2014.027410.1098/rsif.2014.0274 ↗
3. 10.1115/1.402632010.1115/1.4026320 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002 ↗
6. 10.1021/es300606x10.1021/es300606x ↗
7. 10.1641/B57050510.1641/B570505 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02172.x10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02172.x ↗
9. Wojtenek W · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2001 · 204 · 139110.1242/jeb.204.8.1391 ↗
10. 10.1155/2013/34617310.1155/2013/346173 ↗
11. 10.1680/bbn.13.0002410.1680/bbn.13.00024 ↗
12. 10.1080/02724634.1991.1001142410.1080/02724634.1991.10011424 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10237-008-0139-910.1007/s10237-008-0139-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.10.01110.1016/j.medengphy.2004.10.011 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00466-004-0593-y10.1007/s00466-004-0593-y ↗
16. 10.1098/rspa.1972.002610.1098/rspa.1972.0026 ↗
17. Porter ME · Journal of Morphology · 2010 · 271 · 36610.1002/jmor.10803 ↗
18. Yamada H · 1970
19. 10.1242/jeb.0026410.1242/jeb.00264 ↗
20. Eurell JA · 2006
21. Gorensek M · Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters · 2004 · 9 · 363
22. 10.1115/1.132466910.1115/1.1324669 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.153165610.1115/1.1531656 ↗