journal article·2015-09-01

Vibration attenuation performance of long-eared owl plumage

Jiali Gao, Jinkui Chu, Haixin Shang, Le Guan

Publisher page

Abstract

A comparative study of vibration attenuation behaviour of primary remex with lateral branches from the long-eared owl (a silent flying bird), golden eagle and pigeon (two noisy flying birds) was conducted in order to investigate the damping ability of owl’s primary remex. Amplitude variation of the measurement points on the rachis with vane structures was measured by a laser displacement sensor, and vibration process of the observation point on the barb with lateral barbules was recorded by a high-speed camera. Amplitude–time analysis results indicate that loss factors of long-eared owl’s complete primary feathers and barbs are higher than those of the golden eagle and pigeon feathers. Thus, vibration amplitudes of the long-eared owl feathers and their barbs decay much faster, showing a superior vibration-damping characteristic. Consequently, mechanical noise caused by the relative motion of the owl primary feather structures during flight may be effectively suppressed. Vibration reduction principle of the long-eared owl primary feather was briefly discussed based on the damping-by-branching mechanism at last.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Precision & Non-traditional Machining of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Lilley G. M. · AIAA Paper · 1998 · 2340 · l
2. Graham R. · Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society · 1934 · 38 · 83710.1017/S0368393100109915 ↗
3. Mascha E. · Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie · 1903 · 77 · 606
4. 10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60109-110.1016/S1672-6529(11)60109-1 ↗
5. Bachmann T. · Integrative and Comparative Biology · 2012 · 52 · E9
6. 10.1038/233409a010.1038/233409a0 ↗
7. Kroeger R. A. · DTIC Document · 1972 · 96
8. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01384.x10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01384.x ↗
9. 10.1121/1.40127310.1121/1.401273 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01504.x10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01504.x ↗
11. 10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x ↗
12. Herr M. · AIAA Paper · 2007 · 3470
13. 10.1017/jfm.2013.13910.1017/jfm.2013.139 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00348-008-0600-710.1007/s00348-008-0600-7 ↗
15. 10.1006/jsvi.2000.321910.1006/jsvi.2000.3219 ↗
16. Borelli, G. A. De motu animalium. Angeli Bernabo, Rome, 1680, 182–204 .
17. 10.1007/s00707-011-0505-z10.1007/s00707-011-0505-z ↗
18. 10.1002/adem.20060017710.1002/adem.200600177 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00106-810.1016/S0022-460X(03)00106-8 ↗
20. Sun S. · Noise and Vibration Control · 2008 · 3 · 119
22. 10.1007/s00707-013-1010-310.1007/s00707-013-1010-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0956-5663(02)00048-910.1016/S0956-5663(02)00048-9 ↗
24. 10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/04601010.1088/1748-3182/6/4/046010 ↗
25. Gao J. · Shock and Vibration · 2014 · 2014 · 709367
26. 10.1007/BF0190570210.1007/BF01905702 ↗