The trade-off: a central concept for biomimetics
Source abstract
Abstract
Biology is gradually yielding lessons and ideas for technology, but the resulting innovation is adventitious. Biology is also very complex: currently with no underlying analytical model and so cannot adequately be interrogated by technologists. A concept which can bridge this gap is the trade-off, which leads to speciation in biology and aspects of design and problem-solving in engineering. An ontology is described which uses biological organisms as case studies. Terms have been adapted from TRIZ (the Russian system for solving problems creatively) to define trade-offs and the factors by which they can be manipulated. As an example the ontology resolves the biological trade-off “speed-accuracy”, yielding factors for a biomimetic version of the trade-off. These are Feedback (e.g. error-correction), Dynamic Response (e.g. control of thresholds), Adaptation (e.g. ability to predict) and Consolidation (e.g. stochastic accumulation). Since much of evolution can be related to the resolution of trade-offs, it is expected that this ontology can also categorise aspects of natural selection. Multi-criteria analysis will allow more versatile numerical models to be developed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Design Education and Practice
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compind.2010.12.00610.1016/j.compind.2010.12.006 ↗
2. Ashby MF · 2013
3. Deb K · 2001
4. 10.1073/pnas.15227199910.1073/pnas.152271999 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.13121639810.1073/pnas.131216398 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01255.x10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01255.x ↗
7. 10.2307/202654810.2307/2026548 ↗
8. Popper KR · 1963
9. Altshuller G · 1988
10. Anon · 2016
11. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394399-6.00008-410.1016/B978-0-12-394399-6.00008-4 ↗
12. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.001.000110.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.001.0001 ↗
13. 10.1002/jez.70910.1002/jez.709 ↗
14. Rossel S · Journal of Experimental Biology · 2002 · 205 · 332110.1242/jeb.205.21.3321 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.07410.1016/j.cub.2008.07.074 ↗
16. 10.1371/journal.pone.002051810.1371/journal.pone.0020518 ↗
17. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.0021310.3389/fpsyg.2012.00213 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.03010.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.030 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.01310.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.013 ↗
20. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3888-08.200910.1523/JNEUROSCI.3888-08.2009 ↗
21. Atkins AG · 1985
22. 10.1098/rsif.2006.012710.1098/rsif.2006.0127 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_1110.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_11 ↗