journal article·2021-10

Indentation-derived mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V: Laser-powder bed fusion versus electron beam melting

Amir Hadadzadeh, Ebrahim Asadi, Shawkat Imam Shakil, Babak Shalchi Amirkhiz, Mohsen Mohammadi, Meysam Haghshenas

Materials Letters· Volume 301
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Employing a depth-sensing indentation testing technique, the room temperature mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V (Ti64) alloy fabricated through laser powder-bed fusion (L-PBF) and electron beam melting (EBM) additive manufacturing processes were studied. Mechanical properties including nano-hardness (in GPa), reduced elastic modulus, yield pressure, elastic recovery, and wear resistance were extracted. The microstructure of the fabricated materials was correlated with the indentation-derived characteristics. It was observed that the nano-hardness and reduced elastic modulus values were 3.66 ± 0.06 GPa and 118 ± 3 GPa, for the L-PBF, and 3.43 ± 0.22 GPa and 136 ± 4 GPa, for the EBM materials, respectively. The higher strength of the L-PBF alloy is due to the finer microstructure of this alloy. While α laths with an average width of 3.61 ± 0.92 μm developed in the EBM-Ti64, the microstructure of L-PBF-Ti64 consisted of α′ martensite with an average width of 0.37 ± 0.10 μm.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Chunxiang · Mater. Des. · 2011 · 32 · 168410.1016/j.matdes.2010.09.011 ↗
2. Kang · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2019 · 21 · 180135910.1002/adem.201801359 ↗
3. Herzog · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 117 · 37110.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
4. Liu · Mater. Des. · 2019 · 16410.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552 ↗
5. Zhao · Mater. Des. · 2016 · 95 · 2110.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.135 ↗
6. Günther · Int. J. Fatigue · 2017 · 94 · 23610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.018 ↗
7. Zhao · Mater. Sci. Eng. C · 2017 · 70 · 83210.1016/j.msec.2016.07.045 ↗
8. Fotovvati · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 760 · 43110.1016/j.msea.2019.06.020 ↗
9. Dharmendra · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 77110.1016/j.msea.2019.138652 ↗
10. Hadadzadeh · Additive Manufacturing · 2018 · 23 · 12110.1016/j.addma.2018.08.001 ↗
11. DebRoy · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 92 · 11210.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
12. Simonelli · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 616 · 110.1016/j.msea.2014.07.086 ↗
13. Ma · Mater. Character. · 2020 · 166
14. Durst · Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 254710.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.036 ↗
15. Cheng · Appl. phys. lett. · 1998 · 73 · 61410.1063/1.121873 ↗
16. Ehtemam-Haghighi · J. Alloy. Compnd. · 2017 · 692 · 89210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.123 ↗
17. Semiatin · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 356510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00236-1 ↗
18. Kumar · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 154 · 24610.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.044 ↗
19. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 671 · 1710.1016/j.msea.2016.06.046 ↗
20. Fornell · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2011 · 4 · 170910.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.028 ↗