journal article·2013-06

A tilted weak texture processed by an asymmetric extrusion for magnesium alloy sheets

Qingshan Yang, Bin Jiang, Yuan Tian, Wenjun Liu, Fusheng Pan

Materials Letters· Volume 100
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The microstructure and mechanical response of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets processed by the conventional extrusion (CE) and the asymmetric extrusion (ASE) were examined. The textural evolutions of ASE samples at near-surface and mid-layer regions are different throughout the sheet thickness direction due to the additional asymmetric shear deformation. This enforces the crystallographic reorientation of (0002) basal planes to tilt about 12° toward the direction of shear deformation. Moreover, it weakens the basal texture intensity of ASE sheets compared with CE sheets. Improved mechanical properties for magnesium alloys sheets were achieved by the ASE approach as a result of the tilted weak basal texture. ASE processing is suggested as a potential technique to enhance the formability of the extruded magnesium alloy sheets.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Khan · Int J Plast · 2011 · 27 · 68810.1016/j.ijplas.2010.08.009 ↗
2. Chapuis · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 198610.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.064 ↗
3. Watanabe · J Mater Process Technol · 2007 · 182 · 64410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.08.010 ↗
4. Jin · J Mater Sci · 2012 · 47 · 380110.1007/s10853-011-6234-9 ↗
5. Park · J Mater Process Technol · 2009 · 209 · 594010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.07.012 ↗
6. Agnew · Scr Mater · 2004 · 50 · 37710.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.10.006 ↗
7. Cho · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 563810.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.039 ↗
8. John Neil · Int J Plast · 2009 · 25 · 37910.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.003 ↗
9. Kim · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 329310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00161-7 ↗
10. Yi · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 54910.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.024 ↗
11. Wang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 358810.1016/j.msea.2010.02.050 ↗
12. Agnew · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 313510.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.019 ↗
13. Agnew · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 408 · 7210.1016/j.msea.2005.07.052 ↗
14. Chang · J Mater Process Technol · 2011 · 211 · 152710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.04.003 ↗
15. Beausir · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 506110.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.008 ↗
16. Ji · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 499 · 1410.1016/j.msea.2007.11.099 ↗
17. Chang · Mater Des · 2012 · 34 · 74610.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.060 ↗
18. Gong · Mater Des · 2010 · 31 · 158110.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.021 ↗
19. Huang · Scr Mater · 2009 · 60 · 96410.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.022 ↗
20. Huang · J Alloys Compd · 2009 · 479 · 72610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.01.046 ↗