journal article·2017-03Open access

3D cell bioprinting of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels

Bella Raphael, Tony Khalil, Victoria L. Workman, Andrew Smith, Cameron P. Brown, Charles Streuli, Alberto Saiani, Marco Domingos

Materials Letters· Volume 190

Abstract

Bioprinting of 3D cell-laden constructs with well-defined architectures and controlled spatial distribution of cells is gaining importance in the field of Tissue Engineering. New 3D tissue models are being developed to study the complex cellular interactions that take place during both tissue development and in the regeneration of damaged and/or diseased tissues. Despite advances in 3D printing technologies, suitable hydrogels or ‘bioinks’ with enhanced printability and cell viability are lacking. Here we report a study on the 3D bioprinting of a novel group of self-assembling peptide-based hydrogels. Our results demonstrate the ability of the system to print well-defined 3D cell laden constructs with variable stiffness and improved structural integrity, whilst providing a cell-friendly extracellular matrix “like” microenvironment. Biological assays reveal that mammary epithelial cells remain viable after 7 days of in vitro culture, independent of the hydrogel stiffness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001 ↗
2. Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007 ↗
3. Cellularized versus decellularized scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1016/j.matlet.2016.05.152 ↗
4. Towards the design of 3D multiscale instructive tissue engineering constructs: Current approaches and trends10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.05.007 ↗
5. Advanced cell therapies with and without scaffolds10.1002/biot.201100261 ↗
6. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering10.1038/nmat1421 ↗
7. Hydrogel-based reinforcement of 3D bioprinted constructs10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035004 ↗
8. Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications10.1002/jbm.a.34326 ↗
9. A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009 ↗
10. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 ↗
11. A printable photopolymerizable thermosensitive p(HPMAm-lactate)-PEG hydrogel for tissue engineering10.1002/adfm.201002428 ↗
12. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 ↗
13. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050 ↗
14. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y ↗
15. Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00303 ↗
16. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020 ↗
17. 3D printing of cell-laden constructs for heterogeneous tissue regeneration10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.004 ↗
18. Evaluation of an alginate–gelatine crosslinked hydrogel for bioplotting10.1088/1758-5090/7/2/025001 ↗
19. Biofabrication of cell-loaded 3D spider silk constructs10.1002/anie.201409846 ↗
20. Dual-Stage crosslinking of a gel-phase bioink improves cell viability and homogeneity for 3D bioprinting10.1002/adhm.201600636 ↗
21. Optimizing photo-encapsulation viability of heart valve cell types in 3D printable composite hydrogels
22. R. Proksch, R.C. Callahan, Material property measurements using multiple frequency atomic force microscopy. 2011, Google Patents.
23. Loss tangent imaging: Theory and simulations of repulsive-mode tapping atomic force microscopy10.1063/1.3675836 ↗
24. Forces and frequency shifts in atomic-resolution dynamic-force microscopy10.1103/PhysRevB.56.16010 ↗
25. Self-assembled octapeptide scaffolds for in vitro chondrocyte culture10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.044 ↗
26. Self-assembling peptide hydrogel for intervertebral disc tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.033 ↗
27. Human osteoblasts within soft peptide hydrogels promote mineralisation in vitro
28. Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues10.1038/nnano.2010.246 ↗
29. The developmental roles of the extracellular matrix: beyond structure to regulation10.1007/s00441-009-0893-8 ↗
30. Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response10.1016/j.nantod.2010.01.001 ↗
31. Integrins as architects of cell behaviour10.1091/mbc.E15-06-0369 ↗
32. The 'right' size in nanobiotechnology10.1038/nbt872 ↗
33. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface10.1126/science.1106587 ↗
34. Advancing musculoskeletal research with nanoscience10.1038/nrrheum.2013.112 ↗
35. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
36. The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.003 ↗