Self-strengthening tape junctions inspired by recluse spider webs
Source abstract
Abstract
Adhesive tapes are versatile and widely used yet lack adhesion strength due to their tendency to fail via peeling, a weak failure mode. A tape with surprising adhesive properties is the recluse spider's 50 nm-thin silk ribbon with a 1 : 150 aspect ratio. Junctions of these microscopic sticky tapes can withstand the material's tensile failure stress of ≈1 GPa. We modeled these natural tape-tape junctions and revealed a bi-modal failure behavior, critically dependent on the two tapes' intersection angle. One mode leads to regular, low-strength peeling failure, while the other causes the junction to self-strengthen, eliminating the inherent weakness in peeling. This self-strengthening mechanism locks the two tapes together, increasing the junction strength by 550% and allowing some junctions to remain intact after tensile failure. This impressive adhesive strength of tapes has never before been observed or predicted. We found that recluse spiders make tape junctions with pre-stress to force the locked, high-strength failure mode. We used this approach to make junctions with synthetic adhesive tapes that overcame the weak peeling failure.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Silk-based biomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Applied Science Department, William & Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, 23187-8795, USA
Funding
Division of Materials Research · Office of Naval Research
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Autumn · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 1225210.1073/pnas.192252799 ↗
2. Huber · Acta Biomater. · 2007 · 3 · 60710.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.007 ↗
3. Soltannia · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 2199510.1021/am5075375 ↗
4. Peng · Colloids Surf., B · 2014 · 122 · 66210.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.07.047 ↗
5. Zhu · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 2021 · 241 · 10736810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107368 ↗
6. Dickinson · Surf. Innovations · 2016 · 4 · 15810.1680/jsuin.16.00009 ↗
7. Yen · Sens. Actuators, A · 2007 · 139 · 33010.1016/j.sna.2007.01.019 ↗
8. Uvarov · Microelectron. Reliab. · 2021 · 125 · 11437210.1016/j.microrel.2021.114372 ↗
9. Tsao · RSC Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 3028910.1039/D0RA05876A ↗
10. Mencattelli · Composites, Part A · 2020 · 129 · 10565510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105655 ↗
11. Pro · Extreme Mechanics Letters · 2020 · 41 · 10104210.1016/j.eml.2020.101042 ↗
12. Yao · Composites, Part B · 2021 · 224 · 10921810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109218 ↗
13. Yin · Bioinspiration Biomimetics · 2021 · 16 · 02602010.1088/1748-3190/abdf30 ↗
14. Cheng · Composites, Part A · 2011 · 42 · 21110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.11.009 ↗
15. Autumn · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 68110.1038/35015073 ↗
16. Skopic · JOM · 2020 · 72 · 150910.1007/s11837-020-04037-3 ↗
17. Labonte · J. R. Soc., Interface · 2016 · 13 · 2016037310.1098/rsif.2016.0373 ↗
18. Bouligand · Tissue and Cell · 1972 · 4 · 18910.1016/S0040-8166(72)80042-9 ↗
19. Yadav · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2018 · 57 · 1083210.1021/acs.iecr.8b01738 ↗
20. Tushtev · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2008 · 28 · 116410.1016/j.msec.2007.10.039 ↗
21. J. W.Hutchinson and Z.Suo , Advances in Applied Mechanics , Elsevier , 1991 , pp. 63–191
22. Volinsky · Acta Mater. · 2002 · 50 · 44110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00354-8 ↗
23. Ciccotti · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. · 2004 · 24 · 14310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.09.001 ↗
24. Kendall · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1975 · 8 · 144910.1088/0022-3727/8/13/005 ↗
25. Gu · Adv. Sci. · 2016 · 3 · 150032710.1002/advs.201500327 ↗
26. Gouravaraju · J. Adhes. · 2020 · 97 · 1
27. Autumn · J. Exp. Biol. · 2006 · 209 · 356910.1242/jeb.02486 ↗
28. Liu · Extreme Mech. Lett. · 2019 · 32 · 10051810.1016/j.eml.2019.100518 ↗
29. Hui · Soft Matter · 2018 · 14 · 968110.1039/C8SM01731J ↗
30. Schniepp · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 702810.1002/adma.201302740 ↗
31. Wang · ACS Macro Letters · 2018 · 7 · 136410.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00678 ↗
32. Koebley · Mater. Horiz. · 2017 · 4 · 37710.1039/C6MH00473C ↗
33. Deng · J. Appl. Mech. · 2018 · 85 · 11100110.1115/1.4040646 ↗
34. Agarwal · ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. · 2020 · 2 · 349110.1021/acsapm.0c00518 ↗
35. Christoff-Tempesta · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2021 · 16 · 44710.1038/s41565-020-00840-w ↗
36. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2013 · 33 · 320610.1016/j.msec.2013.03.051 ↗
37. Grefe · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. · 2020 · 97 · 10248610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102486 ↗
38. O’Brien · Composites, Part A · 2014 · 56 · 16110.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.015 ↗
39. 3M Scotch, 3MTM Scotch® Transparent Film Tape 600, 3M, 2009
40. Wang · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2020 · 143 · 10398810.1016/j.jmps.2020.103988 ↗
41. da Silva · J. Adhes. · 2006 · 82 · 109110.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
42. Padhye · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2016 · 87 · 08511110.1063/1.4960172 ↗
43. Cerda · Nature · 2002 · 419 · 57910.1038/419579b ↗
44. Silvestre · Engineering Structures · 2016 · 106 · 19510.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.035 ↗
45. Huang · Thin Wall Struct. · 2020 · 154 · 10683810.1016/j.tws.2020.106838 ↗
46. Zhang · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 164010.1039/C4RA09482D ↗
47. Amarpuri · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 1147210.1021/acsnano.5b05658 ↗
48. Jain · Biomacromolecules · 2015 · 16 · 337310.1021/acs.biomac.5b01040 ↗
49. Liu · ACS Mater. Lett. · 2021 · 3 · 145310.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00378 ↗
50. Greco · Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 577610.1038/s41598-019-42070-8 ↗
51. Blasingame · J. Biol. Chem. · 2009 · 284 · 2909710.1074/jbc.M109.021378 ↗
52. Sahni · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 110610.1038/ncomms2099 ↗
53. Wolff · J. R. Soc., Interface · 2017 · 14 · 2016078310.1098/rsif.2016.0783 ↗